1887

Abstract

WYY166 was compared with PA1-10 to examine the taxonomic relationship between the two type strains. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of WYY166 had high similarity (99.9 %) to that of PA1-10. The results of phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that the two strains formed a tight cluster within the genus . Draft genomic comparison between the two strains revealed an average nucleotide identity of 99.3 % and a digital DNA–DNA hybridization estimate of 94.4±1.8 %, strongly indicating that the two strains represented a single species. In addition, neither strain displayed any striking difference in metabolic, physiological or chemotaxonomic features. Therefore, we propose as a later heterotypic synonym of .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • the national natural science foundation of china (Award 42073077)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YuliWei
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005013
2021-09-21
2021-10-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Ruan J. Reclassification of Thermomonospora and Microtetraspora . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:411–422 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Chiba S, Suzuki M, Ando K. Taxonomic re-evaluation of “Nocardiopsis” sp. K-252T (=NRRL 15532T): a proposal to transfer this strain to the genus Nonomuraea as Nonomuraea longicatena sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:1623–1630 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Parte AC. LPSN - List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Klykleung N, Yuki M, Kudo T, Ohkuma M, Phongsopitanun W et al. Nonomuraea phyllanthi sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the leaf of Phyllanthus amarus . Arch Microbiol 2020; 202:55–61 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Qu Y, Sheng Y, Hu X, Leng D, Huang J et al. Nonomuraea nitratireducens sp. nov., a new actinobacterium isolated from Suaeda australis Moq. rhizosphere. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5026–5031 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR, Krichevsky MI et al. Report of the ad hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005013
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.005013
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error