Skip to content
1887

Abstract

In this study, we report a Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped, non-pigmented, motile and aerobic bacterium named strain MTZ26, which was isolated from deep-sea sediment sampled at a cold seep in the South China Sea. Growth of strain MTZ26 occurred at 4–40 °C (optimum, 25–30 °C), pH 6.0–10.0 (optimum, 7.0–8.0) and with 1.0–11.0 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 6.0–8.0 %). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain MTZ26 belonged to the genus and was closely related to PSC101 (97.5 % sequence similarity) and KDW4 (97.5 %). Genomic analysis indicated that strain MTZ26 contains a circular chromosome of 3 331 814 bp with G+C content of 42.2 mol%. The predominant respiratory quinone of MTZ26 was ubiquinone-8. The polar lipids of MTZ26 contained phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, one unidentified aminophospholipid and one unidentified phospholipid. The major fatty acids of strain MTZ26 contained C C C, C ω8, C 3-OH, C 3-OH, C ω8 and summed feature 8 (C ω7 or/and C ω6). Results of phylogenetic, physiological, biochemical and morphological analyses suggested that strain MTZ26 represents a novel species of the genus , and the name sp. nov. is proposed with the type strain MTZ26 (=MCCC 1K05568=JCM 34321).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Key R&D Program of China (Award 2018YFC0310603)
    • Principle Award Recipient: ZhangJian
  • National Key R&D Program of China (Award 2018YFC0310801)
    • Principle Award Recipient: SunQing-lei
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004983
2021-08-25
2025-01-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/71/8/ijsem004983.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004983&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Park S, Yoshizawa S, Hamasaki K, Kogure K, Yokota A. Psychrosphaera saromensis gen. nov., sp. nov., within the family Pseudoalteromonadaceae, isolated from Lake Saroma, Japan. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2010; 56:475–480 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pheng S, Ayyadurai N, Park AY, Kim SG. Psychrosphaera aquimarina sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from seawater collected from Asan Bay, Republic of Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4820–4824 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee JH, Baik KS, Kim D, Seong CN. Psychrosphaera aestuarii sp. nov. and Psychrosphaera haliotis sp. nov., isolated from the marine environment, and emended description of the genus Psychrosphaera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1952–1957 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. eds In Nucleic Acids Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1991 pp 115–147
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kimet M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. A simple method for estimating and testing minimum-evolution trees. Mol Biol 1992; 9:945–967
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol 2003; 52:696–704 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Berlin K, Koren S, Chin CS, Drake JP, Landolin JM et al. Assembling large genomes with single-molecule sequencing and locality-sensitive hashing. Nat Biotechnol 2015; 33:623 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 2010; 25:1754–1760
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. Assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2014; 25:1043–1055
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tatusova T, Dicuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 2011; 8:785–786 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Medema MH, Blin K, Cimermancic P, de Jager V, Zakrzewski P et al. antiSMASH: rapid identification, annotation and analysis of secondary metabolite biosynthesis gene clusters in bacterial and fungal genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:W339–46 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Goker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Xu P, Li W-J, Tang S-K, Zhang Y-Q, Chen G-Z et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family “Oxalobacteraceae” isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1149–1153 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. USFCC News Lett 1990; 20:1–6
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Meth 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Goker M, Sproer C, Klenk HP. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy. Arch Microbiol 2013; 195:413–418 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc Committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004983
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004983
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error