1887

Abstract

Nine strains of a -related bacterium were isolated over a period of 38 years from a laboratory mouse (), seven laboratory rats () and a Syrian hamster () in Düsseldorf and Heidelberg, Germany. The isolates are genotypically and phenotypically distinct from all previously described species. Sequence analysis of 16S rRNA and gene sequences placed the isolates as a novel lineage within the genus . In addition to the single-gene analysis, the whole genome sequence of the strain 1625/19 revealed distinct genome-to-genome distance values to the other species. The genomic DNA G+C content of strain 1625/19 was 40.8 mol% within the range of . At least six phenotypic characteristics separate the new isolates from the other species, with being the most closely related. In contrast to the latter, the new strains display β-haemolysis and are β-glucuronidase, -mannitol and sorbitol positive, but fail to produce lysine decarboxylase and trehalose. The genotypic and phenotypic differences between the novel strains and the other closely related strains of the genus indicate that they represent a novel species within the genus , family , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain 1625/19, (=DSM 111151=CCM 9081), was isolated in 2019 from the nose of a laboratory mouse () in Düsseldorf, Germany.

Keyword(s): haemolysis , Rodentibacter and rodents
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004947
2021-08-11
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adhikary S, Nicklas W, Bisgaard M, Boot R, Kuhnert P et al. Rodentibacter gen. nov. including Rodentibacter pneumotropicus comb. nov., Rodentibacter heylii sp. nov., Rodentibacter myodis sp. nov., Rodentibacter ratti sp. nov., Rodentibacter heidelbergensis sp. nov., Rodentibacter trehalosifermentans sp. nov., Rodentibacter rarus sp. nov., Rodentibacter mrazii and two genomospecies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1793–1806
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Benga L, Sager M, Christensen H. From the [Pasteurella] pneumotropica complex to Rodentibacter spp.: an update on [Pasteurella] pneumotropica . Vet Microbiol 2018; 217:121–134
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Benga L, Benten WPM, Engelhardt E, Köhrer K, Hueber B et al. Differentiation among the most prevalent Rodentibacter species by 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer analysis. Comp Med 2020; 70:487–491 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Benga L, Benten WP, Engelhardt E, Kohrer K, Gougoula C. 16S ribosomal DNA sequence-based identification of bacteria in laboratory rodents: a practical approach in laboratory animal bacteriology diagnostics. Lab Anim 2014; 48:305–312 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:3389–3402 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Benga L, Benten WPM, Engelhardt E, Gougoula C, Sager M. Specific detection and identification of [Actinobacillus] muris by PCR using primers targeting the 16S-23S rRNA internal transcribed spacer regions. J Microbiol Methods 2013; 94:88–93 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dafni H, Greenfeld L, Oren R, Harmelin A. The likelihood of misidentifying rodent Pasteurellaceae by using results from a single PCR assay. J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 2019; 58:201–207 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Busse HJ, Frederiksen WC, Bisgaard M. Proposed minimal standards for the description of genera, species and subspecies of the Pasteurellaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:166–178 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Korczak B, Christensen H, Emler S, Frey J, Kuhnert P. Phylogeny of the family Pasteurellaceae based on rpoB sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1393–1399 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. 2017. PLoS Comput Biol 2017; 13:e1005595 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Goker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc Committee on Reconciliation of Approaches to Bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004947
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004947
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error