1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 71, Issue 7

sp. nov., isolated from aquaculture water Free

Abstract

A novel Gram-stain-negative and rod-shaped bacterial strain, designated as 4Y14, was isolated from aquaculture water and characterized by using a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Strain 4Y14 was found to grow at 10–40 °C (optimum, 28 °C), at pH 7.0–9.0 (optimum, 7.0–8.0) and with 0–2 % NaCl (optimum, 1 %, w/v). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain 4Y14 belonged to the genus with high levels of similarity to c1 (97.8 %) and c14 (97.2 %). Phylogenomic analysis indicated that strain 4Y14 formed an independent branch distinct from the two type strains above. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between strain 4Y14 and the two type strains were, respectively, 25.3 and 25.0 %, and 81.2 and 80.3 %, which were well below the thresholds of 70 % DDH and 95–96 % ANI for species definition, implying that strain 4Y14 should represent a novel genospecies. The predominant cellular fatty acids of strain 4Y14 were summed feature 3 (C c and/or C c) and iso-C; the major polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine; and the sole respiratory quinone was Q-8. The genomic DNA G+C content was 60.1 mol%. Based on the phenotypic and genotypic analyses, strain 4Y14 is concluded to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of the species is 4Y14 (=GDMCC 1.1934=KACC 22080).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Chitinilyticum piscinae , genomic analysis , genotypes and phenotypes and polyphasic taxonomy
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong Province (Award 2019B030316017)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Ming-RongDeng
  • GDAS' Project of Science and Technology Development (Award 2020GDASYL-20200103028)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JuanDu
  • Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (Award 2018B020205003)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HonghuiZhu
© 2021 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004899
2021-07-26
2024-12-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/71/7/ijsem004899.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004899&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Chang SC, Chen WM, Wang JT, Wu MC. Chitinilyticum aquatile gen. nov., sp. nov., a chitinolytic bacterium isolated from a freshwater pond used for Pacific white shrimp culture. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2854–2860 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang S-C, Wu M-C, Chen W-M, Tsai Y-H, Lee T-M. Chitinilyticum litopenaei sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater shrimp pond, and emended description of the genus Chitinilyticum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2651–2655 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Jung A, Jung-Schroers V. Detection of Deefgea chitinilytica in freshwater ornamental fish. Lett Appl Microbiol 2011; 52:497–500 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Gupta V, Gupta N, Capalash N, Sharma P. Bio-prospecting bacterial diversity of hot springs in northern Himalayan region of India for laccases. Indian J Microbiol 2017; 57:285–291 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Fu PP, Xiong F, Feng WW, Zou H, Wu SG et al. Effect of intestinal tapeworms on the gut microbiota of the common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Parasit Vectors 2019; 12:252
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:1073–1095 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Goker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–D214 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. Report of the Ad Hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 268:433–434
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Richter M, Rossello-Mora R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Chang SC, Wang JT, Vandamme P, Hwang JH, Chang PS et al. Chitinimonas taiwanensis gen. nov., sp nov., a novel chitinolytic bacterium isolated from a freshwater pond for shrimp culture. Syst Appl Microbiol 2004; 27:43–49 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Plumbridge J, Pellegrini O. Expression of the chitobiose operon of Escherichia coli is regulated by three transcription factors: NagC, ChbR and CAP. Mol Microbiol 2004; 52:437–449 [View Article] [PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004899
Loading
Chitinilyticum piscinae sp. nov., isolated from aquaculture water
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 71, 004899 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004899
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004899
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004899
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error