sp. nov., isolated from mangrove soil and the proposal for the reclassification of as comb. nov. No Access

Abstract

A novel Gram-stain-negative, aerobic and rod-shaped bacterial strain designated as 6D45A was isolated from mangrove soil and characterized using a polyphasic taxonomic approach. Strain 6D45A was found to grow at 10–37 °C (optimum, 28 °C), at pH 6.0–9.0 (optimum, 7.0) and in 0–5 % (w/v) NaCl (optimum, 2%). Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain 6D45A fell into the genus and shared 99.1 % identity with the closest type strain CGMCC 1.3455 and less than 97.2 % identity with other type strains of this genus. The 34.8 % digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) and 88.3 % average nucleotide identity (ANI) values between strain 6D45A and the closest relative above were well below recognized thresholds of 70 % DDH and 95–96 % ANI for species definition, implying that strain 6D45A should represent a novel genospecies. The phylogenomic analysis indicated that strain 6D45A formed an independent branch distinct from reference strains. The predominant cellular fatty acid of strain 6D45A was summed feature 8 (C c and/or C c, 66.9 %); the polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, two unidentified aminolipids, two unidentified glycolipids and an unknown lipid; the respiratory quinone was Q-10. The genomic DNA G+C content was 66.5 mol %. Based on the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics, strain 6D45A is concluded to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov., is proposed. The type strain of the species is 6D45A (=GDMCC 1.1960=KCTC 82334). We also propose the reclassification of as comb. nov. and ‘’ as a species of the genus .

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Science and Technology Plan Project of Guangdong Province (Award 2019B030316017)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Ming-RongDeng
  • The GDAS' Project of Science and Technology Development (Award 2020GDASYL-20200103028)
    • Principle Award Recipient: JuanDu
  • The Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province (Award 2018B020205003)
    • Principle Award Recipient: HonghuiZhu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004892
2021-07-16
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Martínez-Cánovas MJ, Quesada E, Martínez-Checa F, Moral AD, Béjar V. Salipiger mucescens gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately halophilic, exopolysaccharide-producing bacterium isolated from hypersaline soil, belonging to the alpha-Proteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1735–1740 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Wirth JS, Whitman WB. Phylogenomic analyses of a clade within the roseobacter group suggest taxonomic reassignments of species of the genera Aestuariivita, Citreicella, Loktanella, Nautella, Pelagibaca, Ruegeria, Thalassobius, Thiobacimonas and Tropicibacter, and the proposal of six novel genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2393–2411 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Oren A, Garrity GM. Notification that new names of prokaryotes, new combinations, and new taxonomic opinions have appeared in volume 68, part 7, of the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3077–3079 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hördt A, López MG, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Schleuning M, Weinhold LM et al. Analysis of 1,000+ type-strain genomes substantially improves taxonomic classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front Microbiol 2020; 11:468 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Oren A, Garrity G. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4043–4049 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Rajasabapathy R, Mohandass C, Dastager SG, Liu Q, Li W-J et al. Citreicella manganoxidans sp. nov., a novel manganese oxidizing bacterium isolated from a shallow water hydrothermal vent in Espalamaca (Azores. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 108:1433–1439 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Li S, Tang K, Liu K, Jiao N. Thiobacimonas profunda gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Rhodobacteraceae isolated from deep-sea water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:359–364 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lin Y, Tang K, Li S, Liu K, Sun J et al. Pelagibaca abyssi sp. nov., of the family Rhodobacteraceae, isolated from deep-sea water. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 106:507–513 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Dai X, Wang BJ, Yang QX, Jiao NZ, Liu SJ. Yangia pacifica gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the Roseobacter clade from coastal sediment of the East China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:529–533 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sorokin DY, Tourova TP, Muyzer G. Citreicella thiooxidans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel lithoheterotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium from the Black Sea. Syst Appl Microbiol 2005; 28:679–687 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Park MS, Chung BS, Lee SS, Jin HM, Lee S-S et al. Citreicella aestuarii sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2595–2599 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Llamas I, Mata JA, Tallon R, Bressollier P, Urdaci MC et al. Characterization of the exopolysaccharide produced by Salipiger mucosus A3T, a halophilic species belonging to the Alphaproteobacteria, isolated on the Spanish Mediterranean seaboard. Mar Drugs 2010; 8:2240–2251 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing Ezbiocloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol 2020; 37:1530–1534 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods 2017; 14:587–589 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1993; 10:1073–1095 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Jain C, Rodriguez-R LM, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun 2018; 9:5114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH et al. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant 2020; 13:1194–1202 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–214 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. Report of the Ad Hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Barco RA, Garrity GM, Scott JJ, Amend JP, Nealson KH et al. A genus definition for bacteria and archaea based on a standard genome relatedness index. mBio 2020; 11:e02475–02419 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005; 102:2567–2572 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and phylogeny in the genomic era: advancements and challenges ahead. Curr Opin Microbiol 2007; 10:504–509 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Cai X, Wang Y, Yang X, Liu J, Wu Y et al. Paraphaeobacter pallidus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2520–2526 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Lai Q, Fu Y, Wang J, Chen S, Zhong H et al. Citreicella marina sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:728–731 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Cho JC, Giovannoni SJ. Pelagibaca bermudensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine bacterium within the Roseobacter clade in the order Rhodobacterales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:855–859 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004892
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004892
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed