1887

Abstract

A novel bacterial strain, designated K2CV101002-2, was isolated from forest soil collected at Dinghushan Biosphere Reserve, Guangdong Province, PR China. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that it belonged to the genus and was most closely related to KP01 (99.0 %), followed by Mgbs1 (98.3 %) and O9 (98.1 %). The draft genome sequence was 6.8 Mb long with a relative low G+C content of 39.8 mol%. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between the novel strain and closely related type strains were 71.4‒76.2 % and 18.4‒19.6 %, respectively. Meanwhile the corresponding values between Mgbs1 and O9 were 98.6 and 88.1 %, respectively. The novel strain contained iso-C, C 5 and iso-C 3-OH as the major fatty acids and MK-7 as the predominant respiratory quinone. The polyphasic study clearly supported that strain K2CV101002-2 represents a new species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. (type strain K2CV101002-2=GDMCC 1.1288=JCM 32696) is proposed. In addition, Goh . 2020 should be taken as a later heterotypic synonym of Ping . 2020.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • the GuangDong Province High-Level Talents Special Support Program (Award 2015TX01R067)
    • Principle Award Recipient: YadongHuang
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004865
2021-07-09
2021-07-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Sangkhobol V, Skerman VBD. Chitinophaga, a new genus of chitinolytic myxobacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1981; 31:285–293 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Goh CBS, Wong LW, Parimannan S, Rajandas H, Loke S et al. Chitinophaga extrema sp. nov., isolated from subsurface soil and leaf litter in a tropical peat swamp forest. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:6355–6363 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ping W, Zhang Y, Pang H, Zhang J, Li D et al. Chitinophaga solisilvae sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4808–4815 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dahal RH, Chaudhary DK, Kim DU, Kim J. Chitinophaga fulva sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71:1466–5034 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang XJ, Feng GD, Yao Q, Zhang J, Phuong LTB et al. Chitinophaga tropicalis sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3859–3864 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lv YY, Zhang XJ, Li AZ, Zou WL, Feng GD et al. Chitinophaga varians sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2139–2144
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang C, Lv Y, Li A, Feng G, Bao G et al. Chitinophaga silvisoli sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:909–913 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Dahal RH, Kim J. Chitinophaga caseinilytica sp. nov., a casein hydrolysing bacterium isolated from forest soil. Arch Microbiol 2018; 200:645–651 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lv YY, Wang CL, Feng GD, Yao Q, Su BL et al. Chitinophaga flava sp. nov., isolated from monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:625–630
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lv Y-Y, Wang J, You J, Qiu L-H. Chitinophaga dinghuensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4816–4822
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Shaffer JP, U’Ren JM, Gallery RE, Baltrus DA, Arnold AE. An endohyphal bacterium (Chitinophaga, Bacteroidetes) alters carbon source use by Fusarium keratoplasticum (F. solani species complex, Nectriaceae. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:350 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. McKee LS, Martínez-Abad A, Ruthes AC, Vilaplana F, Brumer H. Focused metabolism of β-glucans by the soil Bacteroidetes species Chitinophaga pinensis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2019; 85:e02231–18 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon SJ, Lim JM, Kim YS et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16s rrna gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha SM, Na SI, Yoon SH et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of Gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg N. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. Reddy C, Breznak T, Marzluf G, Schmidt T. eds In Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd. edn Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007 pp 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark: MIDI Inc; 1990 pp 1–6
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004865
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004865
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error