1887

Abstract

A novel actinomycete, designated NUM-2625, was isolated as an endophytic bacterium in aerial parts of , an endemic species in the Altai, Himalaya mountain chain area, collected from Khasagt Khairkhan Mountain in Mongolia. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain NUM-2625 showed the highest similarity to TT2-10 (99.4 %), KV-744 (99.3 %), and CS5-AC17 (97.7 %). Chemotaxonomic properties of strain NUM-2625 were essentially consistent with those of the genus such as the presence of -diaminopimelic acid as the diagnostic diamino acid of the peptidoglycan, MK-9(H) and MK-9(H) as the major menaquinones, and iso-C, iso-C, iso-C 3-OH, and anteiso-C as the major fatty acids. Meanwhile, digital DNA–DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity values revealed a low relatedness between strain NUM-2625 and the other type strains of the genus . In addition, strain NUM-2625 exhibited several phenotypic properties that could be used to distinguish it from its closest relatives. Based on the results of polyphasic analyses, strain NUM-2625 represents a novel species in the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is NUM-2625 (=NBRC 114660=TBRC 13496).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004861
2021-07-09
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Thawai C, Tanasupawat S, Itoh T, Kudo T. Actinocatenispora thailandica gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Micromonosporaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1789–1794 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Matsumoto A, Takahashi Y, Fukumoto M, Omura S. Actinocatenispora sera sp. nov., isolated by long-term culturing. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:2651–2654 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Seo SH, Lee SD. Actinocatenispora rupis sp. nov., isolated from cliff soil, and emended description of the genus Actinocatenispora. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:3078–3082 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Salam N, Jiao J-Y, Zhang X-T, Li W-J. Update on the classification of higher ranks in the phylum Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1331–1355
    [Google Scholar]
  5. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility) Comarum salesowianum (Stephan) Ash. & Graebn; 2021 https://www.gbif.org/species/3020541
  6. Odontuya G, Banzragchgarav O, Murata T, Batkhuu J, Sasaki K et al. Antibacterially active phenolic lipid derivatives from Comarum salesovianum (Steph.) Aschers. et Gr. Phytochem Lett 2015; 13:360–364 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Coombs JT, Franco CM. Isolation and identification of actinobacteria from surface-sterilized wheat roots. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003; 69:5603–5608 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Hayakawa M, Nonomura H. Humic acid-vitamin agar, a new medium for the selective isolation of soil actinomycetes. J Ferment Technol 1987; 65:501–509
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1996; 16:313–340
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Saito H, Miura K-I. Preparation of transforming deoxyribonucleic acid by phenol treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta 1963; 72:619–629
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Boisvert S, Raymond F, Godzaridis E, Laviolette F, Corbeil J. Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling. Genome Biol 2012; 13:R122 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N. AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:276–282 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:268–274 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:518–522 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: A comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 21:60
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the bacteria and archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:316–324 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Pridham TG, Gottlieb D. The utilization of carbon compounds by some Actinomycetales as an aid for species determination. J Bacteriol 1948; 56:107–114 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Hamada M, Yamamura H, Komukai C, Tamura T, Suzuki K et al. Luteimicrobium album sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from a lichen collected in Japan, and emended description of the genus Luteimicrobium. J Antibiot 2012; 65:427–431 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hamada M, Saitou S, Tamura T. Agromyces mangrovi sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of a mangrove. Arch Microbiol 2018; 200:939–943 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [View Article] [PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004861
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004861
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error