1887

Abstract

A polyphasic taxonomic approach was used to characterize two novel bacterial strains, designated as HDW11 and HDW19, isolated from intestine samples of the dark diving beetle and the diving beetle , respectively. Both isolates were Gram-stain-positive, facultatively anaerobic and non-motile. Strain HDW11 grew optimally at 30 °C, pH 8 and in the presence of 1% (w/v) NaCl. Strain HDW19 grew optimally at 25 °C, pH 7 and in the presence of 0.3% (w/v) NaCl. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and genome sequences revealed that strain HDW11 is a member of the genus and is closely related to VG341 [with 97.9% 16S rRNA sequence identity and 79.1% average nucleotide identity (ANI)], and that strain HDW19 belongs to the genus and is closely related to KCTC 3621 (with 98.9% 16S rRNA sequence identity and 79.5% ANI). The major cellular fatty acids of strains HDW11 and HDW19 were C 9c and anteiso-C, respectively. The sole respiratory quinone of strain HDW11 was MK-9 (H). The major polar lipid components of strain HDW11 were diphosphatidylglycerol and phosphatidylglycerol, and the major polar lipid component of strain HDW19 was diphosphatidylglycerol. The genomic DNA G+C content of strains HDW11 and HDW19 were 72.1 and 37.2 mol%, respectively. The results of phylogenetic, phenotypic, chemotaxonomic and genotypic analyses suggest that strain HDW11 represents a novel species within the genus , and that strain HDW19 represents a novel species within the genus . We propose the name sp. nov. for strain HDW11 (=KACC 21335=KCTC 49320=JCM 33680) and the name for strain HDW19 (=KACC 21347=KCTC 43114=JCM 33684).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Institute of Biological Resources (KR) (Award NIBR201801106)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Jin-WooBae
  • National Research Foundation (KR) (Award 2019R1A6A3A01096031)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Dong-WookHyun
  • National Research Foundation (KR) (Award NRF-2020R1A2C3012797)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Jin-WooBae
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004779
2021-04-22
2021-05-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Wenning M, Breitenwieser F, Huptas C, Doll E, Bächler B et al. Brevilactibacter flavus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel bacterium of the family Propionibacteriaceae isolated from raw milk and dairy products and reclassification of Propioniciclava sinopodophylli as Brevilactibacter sinopodophylli comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2186–2193 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5607–5612 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins MD, Samelis J, Metaxopoulos J, Wallbanks S. Taxonomic studies on some leuconostoc-like organisms from fermented sausages: description of a new genus Weissella for the Leuconostoc paramesenteroides group of species. J Appl Bacteriol 1993; 75:595–603 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kavitake D, Devi PB, Shetty PH. Overview of exopolysaccharides produced by Weissella genus - A review. Int J Biol Macromol 2020; 164:2964–2973 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Oh SJ, Shin N-R, Hyun D-W, Kim PS, Kim JY et al. Weissella diestrammenae sp. nov., isolated from the gut of a camel cricket (Diestrammena coreana). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2951–2956 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Rubio R, Jofré A, Martín B, Aymerich T, Garriga M. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from infant faeces as potential probiotic starter cultures for fermented sausages. Food Microbiol 2014; 38:303–311 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Song HS, Whon TW, Kim J, Lee SH, Kim JY et al. Microbial niches in RAW ingredients determine microbial community assembly during kimchi fermentation. Food Chem 2020; 318:126481 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lim SK, Kwon M-S, Lee J, Oh YJ, Jang J-Y et al. Weissella cibaria WIKIM28 ameliorates atopic dermatitis-like skin lesions by inducing tolerogenic dendritic cells and regulatory T cells in BALB/c mice. Sci Rep 2017; 7:40040 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Sandes S, Figueiredo N, Pedroso S, Sant'Anna F, Acurcio L et al. Weissella paramesenteroides WpK4 plays an immunobiotic role in gut-brain axis, reducing gut permeability, anxiety-like and depressive-like behaviors in murine models of colitis and chronic stress. Food Res Int 2020; 137:109741 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fatmawati NND, Gotoh K, Mayura IPB, Nocianitri KA, Suwardana GNR et al. Enhancement of intestinal epithelial barrier function by Weissella confusa F213 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus FBB81 probiotic candidates in an in vitro model of hydrogen peroxide-induced inflammatory bowel disease. BMC Res Notes 2020; 13:489 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Castilho NPA, Colombo M, Oliveira LLde, Todorov SD, Nero LA. Lactobacillus curvatus UFV-NPAC1 and other lactic acid bacteria isolated from calabresa, a fermented meat product, present high bacteriocinogenic activity against Listeria monocytogenes. BMC Microbiol 2019; 19:63 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Fusco V, Quero GM, Cho G-S, Kabisch J, Meske D et al. The genus Weissella: taxonomy, ecology and biotechnological potential. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:155 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ben Ami E, Yuval B, Jurkevitch E. Manipulation of the microbiota of mass-reared Mediterranean fruit flies Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) improves sterile male sexual performance. Isme J 2010; 4:28–37 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ryu J-H, Ha E-M, Lee W-J. Innate immunity and gut-microbe mutualism in Drosophila . Dev Comp Immunol 2010; 34:369–376 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Yun J-H, Roh SW, Whon TW, Jung M-J, Kim M-S et al. Insect gut bacterial diversity determined by environmental habitat, diet, developmental stage, and phylogeny of host. Appl Environ Microbiol 2014; 80:5254–5264 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Habineza P, Muhammad A, Ji T, Xiao R, Yin X et al. The promoting effect of gut microbiota on growth and development of red palm weevil, Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae) by modulating its nutritional metabolism. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1212 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Engel P, Moran NA. The gut microbiota of insects - diversity in structure and function. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2013; 37:699–735 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Crowson RA. The Biology of the Coleoptera Academic Press; 2013
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Woo S, Song I, Cha HJ. Fast and Facile Biodegradation of Polystyrene by the Gut Microbial Flora of Plesiophthalmus davidis Larvae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2020; 86: 01 09 2020 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ceja-Navarro JA, Karaoz U, Bill M, Hao Z, White RA et al. Gut anatomical properties and microbial functional assembly promote lignocellulose deconstruction and colony subsistence of a wood-feeding beetle. Nat Microbiol 2019; 4:864–875 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sato Shun'ichi, Inoda T, Niitsu S, Kubota S, Goto Y et al. Asymmetric larval head and mandibles of Hydrophilus acuminatus (Insecta: Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae): Fine structure and embryonic development. Arthropod Struct Dev 2017; 46:824–842 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tittsler RP, Sandholzer LA. The use of semi-solid agar for the detection of bacterial motility. J Bacteriol 1936; 31:575–580 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lane D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics 1991115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Biol 1971; 20:406–416 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hyun D-W, Sung H, Kim PS, Lee J-Y, Jeong Y-S et al. Tessaracoccus coleopterorum sp. nov., isolated from the intestine of the dark diving beetle, Hydrophilus acuminatus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2021; 71: 08 12 2020 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park S-C, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1100–1103 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Padonou SW, Schillinger U, Nielsen DS, Franz CMAP, Hansen M et al. Weissella beninensis sp. nov., a motile lactic acid bacterium from submerged cassava fermentations, and emended description of the genus Weissella . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2193–2198 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I, SI N et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Pillay M, Ratner A et al. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:D666–D677 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Ha SM, Kim CK, Roh J, Byun JH, Yang SJ et al. Application of the whole genome-based bacterial identification system, TrueBac ID, using clinical isolates that were not identified with three matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems. Ann Lab Med 2019; 39:530–536 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Benson H. Microbiological application. Laboratory manual in General Microbiology Melbourne. Oxford: Wan C. Publishers. Dubuque; 1994
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Goszczynska T, Serfontein JJ. Milk–Tween agar, a semiselective medium for isolation and differentiation of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae, Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola and Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli. J Microbiol Methods 1998; 32:65–72 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Teather RM, Wood PJ. Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 43:777–780 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. MIDI Sherlock Microbial Identification System Operating Manual, version 3.0 Newark, DE: MIDI, Inc; 1999
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI technical note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Collins MD, Jones D. Distribution of isoprenoid quinone structural types in bacteria and their taxonomic implication. Microbiol Rev 1981; 45:316–354 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Xin H, Itoh T, Zhou P, Suzuki K, Kamekura M et al. Natrinema versiforme sp. nov., an extremely halophilic archaeon from Aibi salt lake, Xinjiang, China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 3:1297–1303 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972; 36:407–477 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Bousfield GR, Sugino H, Ward DN. Demonstration of a COOH-terminal extension on equine lutropin by means of a common acid-labile bond in equine lutropin and equine chorionic gonadotropin. J Biol Chem 1985; 260:9531–9533 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004779
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004779
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error