1887

Abstract

KUDC8001 was isolated from the rhizosperic soil of in the Dokdo Islands, Republic of Korea. Strain KUDC8001 was Gram-stain-negative, non-motile and rod-shaped. KUDC8001 was catalase- and oxidase-positive. This strain is capable of growing at 4–37 °C and pH 7.0–8.0 and exhibited optimal growth at 25 °C and pH 7.0. It could be grown in R2A, nutrient agar and ISP2 agar plates. The cell width ranged from 0.7 to 1.0 µm, and length ranged from 2.5 to 5.5 µm. The genomic G+C content was 40.8 mol%. Phylogenetic analysis, based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, revealed that the strain KUDC8001 belongs to the genus , which is most closely related to the strain HMF7616 (97.5%). The DNA relatedness of KUDC8001 with the type strains of HMF7616, 17 mud1-7 and HMF7605 was ≤80.3 % based on average nucleotide identity calculations and ≤86.9 % based on average amino acid identity calculations. DNA–DNA hybridization values of the strain KUDC8001 with the most closely related strains were 22.1, 24.0 and 24.4 %. Based on its phenotypic, phylogenetic, genetic and chemotaxonomic features, the strain KUDC8001 should be considered as a novel species in the genus , for which we have proposed the name sp. nov. The type strain is KUDC8001 (=KCTC 82078=CGMCC 1.18475).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Kyungpook National University Development Project Research Fund
    • Principle Award Recipient: Ye-JiHwang
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004612
2020-12-17
2024-10-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/71/1/ijsem004612.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004612&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Rickard AH, Stead AT, O'May GA, Lindsay S, Banner M et al. Adhaeribacter aquaticus gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-negative isolate from a potable water biofilm. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:821–829 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC. LPSN – list of prokaryotic names with standing in Nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Elderiny N, Lee J-J, Lee Y-H, Park S-J, Lee S-Y et al. Adhaeribacter terrae sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2922–2927 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim D-U, Kim KW, Kang M-S, Kim J-Y, Jang JH et al. Adhaeribacter swui sp. nov., isolated from wet mud. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1096–1100 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chhetri G, Kim J, Kim I, Lee B, Jang W et al. Adhaeribacter rhizoryzae sp. nov., a fibrillar matrix-producing bacterium isolated from the rhizosphere of rice plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5382–5388 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang J-Y, Liu X-Y, Liu S-J. Adhaeribacter terreus sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1595–1598 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Weon H-Y, Kwon S-W, Son J-A, Kim S-J, Kim Y-S et al. Adhaeribacter aerophilus sp. nov., Adhaeribacter aerolatus sp. nov. and Segetibacter aerophilus sp. nov., isolated from air samples. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2424–2429 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kang H, Kim H, Cha I, Joh K. Adhaeribacter arboris sp. nov., and Adhaeribacter pallidiroseus sp. nov., novel bacteria isolated from birch tree (Betula platyphylla). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 52: [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hwang Y-J, Ghim S-Y. Paenibacillus aceris sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of Acer okamotoanum, a plant native to Ulleungdo Island, Republic of Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1039–1045 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee J-J, Joo ES, Lee DH, Jung H-Y, Kim MK. Phylogenetic diversity and UV resistance analysis of radiation-resistant bacteria isolated from the water in Han River. Korean J Microbiol 2016; 52:65–73 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hwang YJ, Son JS, Ghim SY. Paenibacillus elymi sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of Elymus tsukushiensis, a plant native to the Dokdo Islands, Republic of Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon J-H, Lee ST, Park Y-H. Inter- and intraspecific phylogenetic analysis of the genus Nocardioides and related taxa based on 16S rDNA sequences. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:187–194 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Anzai Y, Kim H, Park JY, Wakabayashi H, Oyaizu H. Phylogenetic affiliation of the pseudomonads based on 16S rRNA sequence. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1563–1589 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules in mammalian protein metabolism; 1969
  18. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny inference package) version 3.696. http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html ; 2008
  20. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018; 35:1547–1549 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chin C-S, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V et al. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 2018; 46:D851–D860 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Brettin T, Davis JJ, Disz T, Edwards RA, Gerdes S et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep 2015; 5:8365 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N et al. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W81–W87 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Rodriguez-R L, Konstantinidis K. The enveomics collection: a toolbox for specialized analyses of microbial genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ Preprints 2016
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Alanjary M, Steinke K, Ziemert N. AutoMLST: an automated web server for generating multi-locus species trees highlighting natural product potential. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W276–W282 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kämpfer P, Irgang R, Poblete-Morales M, Glaeser SP, Cortez-San Martín M et al. Psychromonas aquatilis sp. nov., isolated from seawater samples obtained in the Chilean Antarctica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1306–1311 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Chhetri G, Kim J, Kim H, Kim I, Seo T. Pontibacter oryzae sp. nov., a carotenoid-producing species isolated from a rice paddy field. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:1705–1713 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Derakhshan S, Sattari M, Bigdeli M. Effect of subinhibitory concentrations of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) seed essential oil and alcoholic extract on the morphology, capsule expression and urease activity of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2008; 32:432–436 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Collins C, Grange J, Lyne P, Falkinham J. Collins and Lyne’s Microbiological Methods, 8Ed. Taylor & Francis; 2004
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Cowan ST, Steel KJ. Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria University Press; 1965
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, Microbial IDI. Newark: Del; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Komagata K, Suzuki K-I. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol Series 1987057080–057083
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Shin YK, Lee J, Chun C, Kim H, Park Y. Notes : Isoprenoid Quinone Profiles of the Leclercia adecarboxylata KCTC 1036T. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1996; 6:68–69
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004612
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004612
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error