Two Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped, non-motile, bacterial strains, designated as ZB1P21T and ZT4R22T, were isolated from ice and cryoconite samples collected from Zepu glacier on the Tibetan Plateau, PR China. The phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene showed that the two strains belong to the genus Mucilaginibacter. Strain ZB1P21T showed the highest similarity to Mucilaginibacter rigui WPCB133T (97.35 %), while strain ZT4R22T showed the highest similarity to Mucilaginibacter gilvus F01003T (99.11 %). The average nucleotide identity values between the two novel strains and their closest relatives were 79.42 and 85.72 % respectively. The two novel strains contained MK-7 as the major menaquinone, and summed feature 3 (comprising C16 : 1 ω7c and/or C16 : 1 ω6c), iso-C15:0, iso-C17 : 03-OH and C16 : 1 ω5c as the major fatty acids. The major polar lipid of the two novel strains were phosphatidylethanolamine. Based on these data, we propose two novel species, Mucilaginibacter glaciei sp. nov. (ZB1P21T=CGMCC 1.23981T=NBRC 113932T) and Mucilaginibacter pankratovii sp. nov. (ZT4R22T=CGMCC 1.23487T=NBRC 113931T).
PankratovTA,
TindallBJ,
LiesackW,
DedyshSN.
Mucilaginibacter paludis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Mucilaginibacter gracilis sp. nov., pectin-, xylan- and laminarin-degrading members of the family Sphingobacteriaceae from acidic Sphagnum peat bog. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2007; 57:2349–2354 [View Article][PubMed]
ChenXY,
ZhaoR,
TianY,
KongBH,
LiXD et al.Mucilaginibacter polytrichastri sp. nov., isolated from a moss (Polytrichastrum formosum), and emended description of the genus Mucilaginibacter
. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2014; 64:1395–1400 [View Article][PubMed]
LaneDJ.
16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In
StackebrandtE,
GoodfellowM.
(editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp 115–175
YoonSH,
HaSM,
KwonS,
LimJ,
KimY et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
BrettinT,
DavisJJ,
DiszT,
EdwardsRA,
GerdesS et al. RASTtk: a modular and extensible implementation of the RAST algorithm for building custom annotation pipelines and annotating batches of genomes. Sci Rep2015; 5:8365 [View Article][PubMed]
KimM,
OhHS,
ParkS-C,
ChunJ.
Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol2014; 64:346–351 [View Article][PubMed]
BankevichA,
NurkS,
AntipovD,
GurevichAA,
DvorkinM et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol2012; 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
NaSI,
KimYO,
YoonS-H,
HaSM,
BaekI et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol2018; 56:280–285 [View Article][PubMed]
RichterM,
Rosselló-MóraR.
Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
WayneLG,
BrennerDJ,
ColwellRR,
GrimontPAD,
KandlerO et al. International Committee on systematic bacteriology. Report of the AD hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol1987; 37:463–464
GerhardtP,
MurrayRGE,
WoodWA,
KriegNR.
(editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994
SmibertRM,
KriegNR.
Phenotypic characterization. In
GerhardtP,
MurrayRGE,
WoodWA,
KriegNR.
(editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC.: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
CollinsMD.
Isoprenoidquinone analysis in classification and identification. In
GoodfellowM,
MinnikinDE.
(editors) Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp 267–287