1887

Abstract

A marine alphaproteobacterium, designated as strain GH3-10, was isolated from the rhizosphere mud of a halophyte () collected at the seashore of Gangwha Island, Republic of Korea. The isolate was found to be Gram-stain-negative, strictly aerobic, catalase- and oxidase-positive, non-motile, short rods and produced orange-coloured colonies. The 16S rRNA gene- and whole genome-based phylogenetic analyses exhibited that strain GH3-10 belonged to the genus and was most closely related to s21-N3 (98.7 % 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity) and KCTC 23554 (98.4 %). The major respiratory quinone was ubiquinone-10. The polar lipids consisted of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, sphingoglycolipid and an unidentified lipid. The major fatty acids were C 7, summed feature 3 (C 7 and/or C 6) and C 7 10-methyl. The DNA G+C content was 61.3 mol% (by genome). Average nucleotide identity and DNA–DNA relatedness values between the isolate and its phylogenetically closest relatives, together with phenotypic distinctness warranted the taxonomic description of a new species. On the basis of data obtained by a polyphasic approach, strain GH3-10 (=KCTC 62379=JCM 32444) represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. According to phylogenetic coherence based on 16S rRNA genes and core genomes, it is also proposed that Lee . 2019. and Yoon . 2003 be transferred to comb. nov. and comb. nov., respectively.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004524
2020-10-23
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/12/6257.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004524&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Xu L, Sun C, Fang C, Oren A, X-W X. Genome-based taxonomic classification of the family Erythrobacteracae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol in press 2020
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee YS, Lee DH, Kahng HY, Kim EM, Jung JS. Erythrobacter gangjinensis sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1413–1417 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Jung YT, Park S, Oh TK, Yoon J-H. Erythrobacter marinus sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2050–2055 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. D-D L, Zhang Y-Q, Peng M, Wang N, Wang X-J et al. Erythrobacter xanthus sp. nov., isolated from surface water of the South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 672:2459–2464
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhuang L, Liu Y, Wang L, Wang W, Shao Z. Erythrobacter atlanticus sp. nov., a bacterium from ocean sediment able to degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:3714–3719 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lei X, Zhang H, Chen Y, Li Y, Chen Z et al. Erythrobacter luteus sp. nov., isolated from mangrove sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2472–2478 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fang C, Wu YH, Sun C, Wang H, Cheng H et al. Erythrobacter zhengii sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:241–248 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Xing T, Liu Y, Wang N, Xu B, Liu K et al. Erythrobacter arachoides sp. nov., isolated from ice core. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4235–4239 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Park S, Jung YT, Choi SJ, Yoon JH. Erythrobacter aquimixticola sp. nov., isolated from the junction between the ocean and a freshwater spring. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2964–2969 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Subhash Y, Tushar L, Sasikala C, Ramana CV, Ch S, ChV R. Erythrobacter odishensis sp. nov. and Pontibacter odishensis sp. nov. isolated from dry soil of a solar saltern. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4524–4532 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhuang L, Lin B, Xu L, Li G, Wu CJ et al. Erythrobacter spongiae sp. nov., isolated from marine sponge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1111–1116 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee SD, Kim YJ, Kim IS. Erythrobacter suaedae sp. nov., isolated from a rhizosphere mudflat of a halophyte (Suaeda japonica). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3287–3292 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The ClustalX windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 24:4876–4882
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brosius J, Palmer ML, Kennedy PJ, Noller HF. Complete nucleotide sequence of a 16S ribosomal RNA gene from Escherichia coli . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1978; 75:4801–4805 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN. editor Mammalian Protein Metabolism New York: Academic Press; 1969 pp 21–132
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hopwood DA, Bibb MJ, Chater KF, Kieser T, Bruton CJ et al. Genetic Manipulation of Streptomyces. A Laboratory Manual Norwich: John Innes Foundation; 1985
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha SM, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11:119 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 2011; 7:e1002195 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:772–780 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2--approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9490 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yoon SH, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Minnikin DE, Patal PV, Alshamaony L, Goodfellow M. Polar lipid composition in the classification of Nocardia and related bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1977; 27:104–117 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kroppenstedt RM. Fatty acid and menaquinone analysis of actinomycetes and related organisms. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. (editors) Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp 173–199
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:12196–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on systematic bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Yoon JH, Kim H, Kim IG, Kang KH, Park YH. Erythrobacter flavus sp. nov., a slight halophile from the East Sea in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:1169–1174 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004524
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004524
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error