1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 70, Issue 11

sp. nov., isolated from seawater Free

Abstract

A novel Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, and rod-shaped bacterial strain, M24A2M, was isolated from seawater in the Republic of Korea. On the basis of the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny, strain M24A2M was found to be closely related to US6-1 and SM117 with pair-wise sequence similarities of 97.4 and 96.9 %, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA sequences indicated that M24A2M formed a branch with US6-1 and represented a member of the genus . The predominant cellular fatty acids were C 2-OH, summed feature 3 (C 7 and/or C 6), and summed feature 8 (C 7 and/or C 6). The polar lipids of strain M24A2M consisted mainly of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, one unidentified phospholipid, and two unidentified lipids. The respiratory quinone was ubiquinone Q-10. The genomic DNA G+C content was 63.9 %. Given the phenotypic characteristics along with the phylogenetic distinctness and chemotaxonomic features, strain M24A2M is considered to represent a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of sp. nov. is M24A2M (=KCTC 72894=JCM 33983).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Novosphingobium aquimarinum , polyphasic characterization and seawater
Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • This research was supported by the Basic Core Technology Development Program for the Oceans and the Polar Regions of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (Award 2016M1A5A1027453)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Hee-Mock Oh
© 2020 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004493
2020-10-09
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/11/5911.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004493&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405–1417 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Parte AC. LPSN - List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (bacterio.net), 20 years on. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:1825–1829 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Sohn JH, Kwon KK, Kang JH, Jung HB, Kim SJ. Novosphingobium pentaromativorans sp. nov., a high-molecular-mass polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from estuarine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1483–1487 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Ibero J, Sanz D, Galán B, Díaz E, García JL. High-quality whole-genome sequence of an estradiol-degrading strain, Novosphingobium tardaugens NBRC 16725. Microbiol Resour Announc 2019; 8:e01715–01718 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Ibero J, Galán B, Díaz E, García JL. Testosterone degradative pathway of Novosphingobium tardaugens. Genes 2019; 10:871–17 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang J, Wang C, Li Q, Shen M, Bai P et al. Microcystin-LR degradation and gene regulation of microcystin-degrading Novosphingobium sp. THN1 at different carbon concentrations. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:1–14 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun R, Sun P, Zhang J, Esquivel-Elizondo S, Wu Y. Microorganisms-based methods for harmful algal blooms control: a review. Bioresour Technol 2018; 248:12–20 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Nei M, Kumar S, Takahashi K. The optimization principle in phylogenetic analysis tends to give incorrect topologies when the number of nucleotides or amino acids used is small. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:12390–12397 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gupta SK, Lal D, Lal R. Novosphingobium panipatense sp. nov. and Novosphingobium mathurense sp. nov., from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:156–161 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Simão FA, Waterhouse RM, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:3210–3212 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T et al. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008; 9:75 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Zuo G, Hao B. CVTree3 web server for whole-genome-based and alignment-free prokaryotic phylogeny and taxonomy. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2015; 13:321–331 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun 2019; 10:2182 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kim M, Oh H-S, Park S-C, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse H-J, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:249–266 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, editor. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol 1966; 45:493–496 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101 Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp 330–393
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Kates M. Techniques of Lipidology: Isolation, Analysis and Identification of Lipids Amsterdam: North-Holland Pub. Co.; 1972
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Oren A, Duker S, Ritter S. The polar lipid composition of Walsby’s square bacterium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1996; 138:135–140 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Tamaoka J. Analysis of bacterial menaquinone mixtures by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Methods Enzymol 1986; 123:251–256 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004493
Loading
Novosphingobium aquimarinum sp. nov., isolated from seawater
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70, 5911 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004493
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004493
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004493
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error