1887

Abstract

Two anaerobic bacteria, designated strains SYSU GA16112 and SYSU GA16107, were isolated from a hot spring in Tengchong County, Yunnan Province, south-west PR China. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strains SYSU GA16112 and SYSU GA16107 belong to the family . Cells of strains SYSU GA16112 and SYSU GA16107 were Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped and non-motile. The major fatty acids (>10 %) of strains SYSU GA16112 and SYSU GA16107 were identified as anteiso-C and anteiso-C 3OH. The polar lipid profile of strain SYSU GA16112 was found to consist of phosphatidylethanolamine, two unidentified aminophospholipids, two unidentified phosphoglycolipids, two unidentified aminolipids and one unidentified polar lipid, while that of strain SYSU GA16107 consisted of phosphatidylethanolamine, two unidentified polar lipids, three unidentified aminophospholipids, two unidentified phosphoglycolipids and one unidentified aminolipid. The genomic DNA G+C contents of strains SYSU GA16112 and SYSU GA16107 were determined to be 41.90 and 41.89 %, respectively, and the average nucleotide identity value between them was 99.99 %. Based on their morphological and physiological properties, and results of phylogenetic analyses, strains SYSU GA16112 and SYSU GA16107 are considered to represent a novel species of a novel genus, for which the name gen. nov., sp. nov. (type strain SYSU GA16112=CGMCC 1.5281=KCTC 15753) is proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Award 2019A1515110227)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Lan Liu
  • Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of the Central South University (Award 19lgpy204)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Lan Liu
  • Guangzhou Science, Technology and Innovation Commission (Award 201803030030)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Wen-Jun Li
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Award 2019M653156)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Lan Liu
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 91951205)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Wen-Jun Li
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004469
2020-09-21
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/11/5717.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004469&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Ormerod KL, Wood DLA, Lachner N, Gellatly SL, Daly JN et al. Genomic characterization of the uncultured Bacteroidales family S24-7 inhabiting the guts of homeothermic animals. Microbiome 2016; 4:36 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T et al. Analysis of 1000 type-strain genomes improves taxonomic classification of Bacteroidetes. Front Microbiol 2019; 10:10 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hofstad T, Olsen I, Eribe ER, Falsen E, Collins MD et al. Dysgonomonas gen. nov. to accommodate Dysgonomonas gadei sp. nov., an organism isolated from a human gall bladder, and Dysgonomonas capnocytophagoides (formerly CDC group DF-3). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50 Pt 6:2189–2195 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hahnke S, Langer T, Koeck DE, Klocke M. Erratum to description of Proteiniphilum saccharofermentans sp. nov., Petrimonas mucosa sp. nov. and Fermentimonas caenicola gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from mesophilic laboratory-scale biogas reactors, and emended description of the genus Proteiniphilum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2454 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Grabowski A, Tindall BJ, Bardin V, Blanchet D, Jeanthon C. Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1113–1121 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen S, Dong X. Proteiniphilum acetatigenes gen. nov., sp. nov., from a UASB reactor treating brewery wastewater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2257–2261 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation list no. 193. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2960–2966 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Binod P, Sindhu R, Singhania RR, Vikram S, Devi L et al. Bioethanol production from rice straw: an overview. Bioresour Technol 2010; 101:4767–4774 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bugg TDH, Ahmad M, Hardiman EM, Rahmanpour R. Pathways for degradation of lignin in bacteria and fungi. Nat Prod Rep 2011; 28:1883–1896 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Balch WE, Fox GE, Magrum LJ, Woese CR, Wolfe RS. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiol Rev 1979; 43:260–296[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Leifson E. Atlas of Bacterial Flagellation London: Academic Press; 1960
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Liu L, Zhou E-M, Jiao J-Y, Manikprabhu D, Ming H et al. Hymenobacter latericoloratus sp. nov. and Hymenobacter luteus sp. nov., isolated from freshwater sediment. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:165–172 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu P, Li W-J, Tang S-K, Zhang Y-Q, Chen G-Z et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family 'Oxalobacteraceae' isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1149–1153 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703–704 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Collins MD, Jones D. Lipids in the classification and identification of coryneform bacteria containing peptidoglycan based on 2,4-diaminobutyric acid. Appl Bacteriol 1980; 48:459–470
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The clustal X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1977; 25:4876–4882
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res 2010; 20:265–272 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. Soap: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008; 24:713–714 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Jiménez G, Urdiain M, Cifuentes A, López-López A, Blanch AR et al. Description of Bacillus toyonensis sp. nov., a novel species of the Bacillus cereus group, and pairwise genome comparisons of the species of the group by means of ANI calculations. Syst Appl Microbiol 2013; 36:383–391 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Salam N, Jiao J-Y, Zhang X-T, Li W-J. Update on the classification of higher ranks in the phylum Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:1331–1355 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu M, Scott AJ. Phylogenomic analysis of bacterial and archaeal sequences with AMPHORA2. Bioinformatics 2012; 28:1033 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Edgar RC. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Castresana J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 2000; 17:540–552 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stamatakis A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:2688–2690 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Luo C, Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:e73–e74 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Bilen M, Fonkou MDM, Dubourg G, Tomei E, Richez M et al. Dysgonomonas massiliensis sp. nov., a new species isolated from the human gut and its taxonogenomic description. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:935–945 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Olsen I. Genus III. Dysgonomonas. In Krieg NR, Staley JT, Brown DR, Hedlund BP, Aster NL et al. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, second edition, vol.4 (The Bacteroidetes, Spirochaetes, Tenericutes (Mollicutes), Acidobacteria, Fibrobacteres, Fusobacteria, Dictyoglomi, Gemmatimonadetes, Lentisphaerae, Verrucomicrobia, Chlamydiae, and Planctomycetes) New York: Springer; 2012 p 71
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004469
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004469
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error