1887

Abstract

Six Gram-stain-negative, catalase- and oxidase-positive, rod-shaped and motile strains (FT9W, FT25W, FT26W, FT109W, FT134W and CY42W) were isolated from subtropical streams in China. Comparisons based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the six strains shared similarities of less than 98.1 % with other species within the family and formed two separately distinct clades in phylogenetic trees. The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities between strains FT9W and FT25W, and between strains FT109W and FT134W were both 99.7 %. The genome sizes of strains FT9W, FT25W, FT26W, FT109W, FT134W and CY42W were 6.45, 6.45, 6.54, 6.43, 6.52 and 6.74 Mbp with G+C contents of 64.0, 64.0, 63.8, 63.2, 63.2 and 62.5 %, respectively. The calculated pairwise average nucleotide (ANI) values among the six strains and other related species were less than 93.9 %, except that the values were 99.9 % between strains FT9W and FT25W, 98.2 % between strains FT109W and FT134W, and 95.0 and 95.1 % between strain FT26W and strains FT9W and FT25W, respectively. However, strain FT26W shared 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities of only 98.3 and 98.2 % with FT9W and FT25W, respectively. The respiratory quinone of the six strains was determined to be Q-8. The major fatty acids were C 7, C and C. The predominant polar lipids included phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylglycerol. Considering the phenotypic, biochemical, genotypic and ANI data, strains FT9W and FT25W, and FT109W and FT134W may belong to the same species, respectively. Although the pairwise ANI values between strain FT26W and each of strains FT9W and FT25W were located in the transition region of species demarcation, the dissimilarities among them indicated that strain FT26W could represent an independent novel species. The reconstructed phylogenomic tree based on a concatenation of 92 core genes showed that the six strains clustered closely with Sac-22 and KCTC 22382, and supported that these six strains belong to the genus . The names sp. nov. (type strain FT9W=GDMCC 1.1637=KACC 21313), sp. nov. (type strain FT26W=GDMCC 1.1641=KACC 21315), sp. nov. (type strain FT109W=GDMCC 1.1688=KACC 21480) and sp. nov. (type strain CY42W=GDMCC 1.1673=KACC 21465) are proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Guangdong MEPP Fund (Award NO. GDOE(2019)A34)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Meiying Xu
  • GDAS’ Special Project of Science and Technology Development (Award 2018GDASCX-0916; 2019GDASYL-0301002)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Meiying Xu
  • Guangdong Provincial Programs for Science and Technology Development (Award 2019B110205004; 2018B030324002)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Meiying Xu
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award 91851202; 51678163)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Meiying Xu
  • Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, China (Award No. 2018B020205003)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Meiying Xu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004234
2020-05-27
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/6/3801.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004234&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Hiraishi A, Shin YK, Sugiyama J. Proposal to reclassify Zoogloea ramigera IAM 12670 (P. R. Dugan 115) as Duganella zoogloeoides gen. nov., sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:1249–1252 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kämpfer P, Wellner S, Lohse K, Martin K, Lodders N. Duganella phyllosphaerae sp. nov., isolated from the leaf surface of Trifolium repens and proposal to reclassify Duganella violaceinigra into a novel genus as Pseudoduganella violceinigra gen. nov., comb. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2012; 35:19–23 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Saravanan VS, Hari K, Lee K-C et al. Duganella sacchari sp. nov. and Duganella radicis sp. nov., two novel species isolated from rhizosphere of field-grown sugar cane. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1126–1131 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang J, Kim Y-J, Hoang V-A, Lan Nguyen N, Wang C et al. Duganella ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from ginseng soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:56–61 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic acid sequencing techniques in bacterial systematics New York, USA: Wiley; 1991 pp 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403–410 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Sci Am 1979; 241:98–126 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst Zool 1969; 18:1–32 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Michael R, Ramon RM. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the AD hoc Committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Dong XZ, Cai MY. Determinative Manual for Routine Bacteriology Beijing, China: Beijing Scientific Press; 2001.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Lu H, Xing P, Phurbu D, Tang Q, Wu Q. Pelagibacterium montanilacus sp. nov., an alkaliphilic bacterium isolated from lake Cuochuolong on the Tibetan Plateau. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2220–2225 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ventosa A, Quesada E, Rodriguez-Valera F, Ruiz-Berraquero F, Ramos-Cormenzana A. Numerical taxonomy of moderately halophilic gram-negative rods. J Gen Microbiol 1982; 128:1959–1968 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhong Z-P, Liu Y, Wang F, Zhou Y-G, Liu H-C et al. Lacimicrobium alkaliphilum gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the family Alteromonadaceae isolated from a salt lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:422–429 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kuykendall LD, Roy MA, O'Neill JJ, Devine TE. Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:358–361 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria through fatty acid analysis. In Klement Z, Rudolph K, Sands DC. (editors) Methods in Phytobacteriology Budapest, Hungary: Akademiai Kaido; 1990 pp 199–204
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sun L-N, Yang E-D, Cui D-X, Ni Y-W, Wang Y-B et al. Massilia buxea sp. nov., isolated from a rock surface. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4390–4396 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Zhang Y-Q, Li W-J, Zhang K-Y, Tian X-P, Jiang Y et al. Massilia dura sp. nov., Massilia albidiflava sp. nov., Massilia plicata sp. nov. and Massilia lutea sp. nov., isolated from soils in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:459–463 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lincoln SP, Fermor TR, Tindall BJ. Janthinobacterium agaricidamnosum sp. nov., a soft rot pathogen of Agaricus bisporus . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49 Pt 4:1577–1589 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. De Ley J, Segers P, Gillis M. Intra and intergeneric similarities of Chromobacterium and Janthinobacterium ribosomal ribonucleicacid cistrons. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1978; 25:154–168
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lu H, Deng T, Cai Z, Liu F, Yang X et al. Janthinobacterium violaceinigrum sp. nov., Janthinobacterium aquaticum sp. nov. and Janthinobacterium rivuli sp. nov., isolated from a subtropical stream in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2719–2725 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004234
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004234
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error