@article{mbs:/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004232, author = "Zhu, Wentao and Li, Junqin and Wang, Xiaoxia and Yang, Jing and Lu, Shan and Lai, Xin-He and Jin, Dong and Huang, Yuyuan and Zhang, Sihui and Pu, Ji and Zhou, Juan and Ren, Zhihong and Huang, Ying and Wu, Xiaomin and Xu, Jianguo", title = "Actinomyces wuliandei sp. nov., Corynebacterium liangguodongii sp. nov., Corynebacterium yudongzhengii sp. nov. and Oceanobacillus zhaokaii sp. nov., isolated from faeces of Tibetan antelope in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau of China", journal= "International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology", year = "2020", volume = "70", number = "6", pages = "3763-3774", doi = "https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004232", url = "https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004232", publisher = "Microbiology Society", issn = "1466-5034", type = "Journal Article", keywords = "Oceanobacillus zhaokaii", keywords = "Tibetan antelope", keywords = "Corynebacterium liangguodongii", keywords = "Corynebacterium yudongzhengii", keywords = "Actinomyces wuliandei", keywords = "Qinghai-Tibet Plateau", abstract = "Eight Gram-stain-positive, rod-shaped bacterial strains were isolated from faeces of Tibetan antelopes on the Tibet-Qinghai Plateau of China. Genomic sequence analysis showed that the strains belong to the genera Actinomyces (strains 299T and 340), Corynebacterium (strains 2184T, 2185, 2183T and 2189) and Oceanobacillus (strains 160T and 143), respectively, with a percentage of similarity for the 16S rRNA gene under the species threshold of 98.7 % except for strains 160T and 143 with Oceanobacillus arenosus CAU 1183T (98.8 %). The genome sizes (and genomic G+C contents) were 3.1 Mb (49.4 %), 2.5 Mb (64.9 %), 2.4 Mb (66.1 %) and 4.1 Mb (37.1 %) for the type strains 299T, 2183T, 2184T and 160T, respectively. Two sets of the overall genome relatedness index values between our isolates and their corresponding closely related species were under species thresholds (95 % for average nucleotide identity, and 70 % for digital DNA–DNA hybridization). These results, together with deeper genotypic, genomic, phenotypic and biochemical analyses, indicate that these eight isolates should be classified as representing four novel species. Strain 299T (=CGMCC 1.16320T=JCM 33611T) is proposed as representing Actinomyces wuliandei sp. nov.; strain 2184T (=CGMCC 1.16417T=DSM 106203T) is proposed as representing Corynebacterium liangguodongii sp. nov.; strain 2183T (=CGMCC 1.16416T=DSM 106264T) is proposed as representing Corynebacterium yudongzhengii sp. nov.; and strain 160T (=CGMCC 1.16367T=DSM 106186T) is proposed as representing Oceanobacillus zhaokaii sp. nov.", }