1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 70, Issue 4

sp. nov., isolated from subsurface sediment Free

Abstract

A Gram-reaction-negative, yellow-pigmented, rod-shaped, aerobic, non-motile, non-spore-forming bacterium, designated strain QTA69, was isolated from a subsurface sediment sample collected at the Qiangtang basin, Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau, PR China. Cells were catalase-positive and oxidase-negative. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain QTA69 was a member of the genus and was closely related to , and with sequence similarities from 97.90 % to 96.85 %. Strain QTA69 grew at 4–35 °C, and the optimum temperature was 25–28 °C. It grew at the pH range of 6.0–9.0 (optimum, pH 7.0–8.0) and its NaCl tolerance was 0–2.0 % (optimum, 0–1.0 %). The major cellular fatty acids were summed feature 3 (iso-C 2-OH and Cω6/Cω7), iso-C and Cω5. The major respiratory quinone was MK-7 and the major polar lipid was phosphatidylethanolamine. Genome sequencing revealed a genome size of 8.41 Mbp and a G+C content of 46.87 mol%. Based on whole genome average nucleotide identity values, phenotypic data, phylogenetic data and genotypic data, strain QTA69 represents a novel species of genus , for which the name sp. nov is proposed. The type strain is QTA69 (=CGMCC 1.13688=KCTC 72024).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Revised:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): Dyadobacter , genome , novel species , polyphasic taxonomy and subsurface sediment
© 2020 The Authors
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004030
2020-02-10
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/4/2281.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004030&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Chelius MK, Triplett EW. Dyadobacter fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Gram-negative bacterium isolated from surface-sterilized Zea mays stems. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:751–758 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaturvedi P, Reddy GSN, Shivaji S. Dyadobacter hamtensis sp. nov., from Hamta glacier, located in the Himalayas, India. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:2113–2117 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Reddy GSN, Garcia-Pichel F. Dyadobacter crusticola sp. nov., from biological soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau, USA, and an emended description of the genus Dyadobacter Chelius and Triplett 2000. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1295–1299 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu Q-M, WT lm, Lee M, Yang DC, Lee ST. Dyadobacter ginsengisoli sp. nov., isolated from soil of a ginseng field. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:1939–1944 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Tang Y, Dai J, Zhang L, Mo Z, Wang Y et al. Dyadobacter alkalitolerans sp. nov., isolated from desert sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:60–64 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhang D-C, Liu H-C, Xin Y-H, Zhou Y-G, Schinner F et al. Dyadobacter psychrophilus sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1640–1643 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Lee M, Woo S-G, Park J, Yoo S-A. Dyadobacter soli sp. nov., a starch-degrading bacterium isolated from farm soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2577–2582 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen L, Jiang F, Xiao M, Dai J, Kan W et al. Dyadobacter arcticus sp. nov., isolated from Arctic soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1616–1620 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dong Z, Guo X, Zhang X, Qiu F, Sun L et al. Dyadobacter beijingensis sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of turf grasses in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:862–865 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao J-L, Sun P, Wang X-M, Qiu T-L, Lv F-Y et al. Dyadobacter endophyticus sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from maize root. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4022–4026 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Baik KS, Kim MS, Kim EM, Kim HR, Seong CN. Dyadobacter koreensis sp. nov., isolated from fresh water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1227–1231 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chun J, Kang JY, Joung Y, Kim H, Joh K et al. Dyadobacter jejuensis sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:1788–1792 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Shen L, Liu Y, Yao T, Wang N, Xu B et al. Dyadobacter tibetensis sp. nov., isolated from glacial ice core. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3636–3639 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Tian M, Zhang R-G, Han L, Zhao X-M, Lv J. Dyadobacter sediminis sp. nov., isolated from a subterranean sediment sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:827–832 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Han L, Wu S-J, Qin C-Y, Zhu Y-H, Lu Z-Q et al. Hymenobacter qilianensis sp. nov., isolated from a subsurface sandstone sediment in the permafrost region of Qilian Mountains, China and emended description of the genus Hymenobacter . Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 105:971–978 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Colwell FS, Stormberg GJ, Phelps TJ, Birnbaum SA, McKinley J et al. Innovative techniques for collection of saturated and unsaturated subsurface basalts and sediments for microbiological characterization. J Microbiol Methods 1992; 15:279–292 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1991 pp 115–175
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ludwig W et al. ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1363–1371 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yarza P, Richter M, Peplies J, Euzeby J, Amann R et al. The All-Species Living Tree project: a 16S rRNA-based phylogenetic tree of all sequenced type strains. Syst Appl Microbiol 2008; 31:241–250 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kishino H, Hasegawa M. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in hominoidea. J Mol Evol 1989; 29:170–179 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Li R, Zhu H, Ruan J, Qian W, Fang X et al. De novo assembly of human genomes with massively parallel short read sequencing. Genome Res 2010; 20:265–272 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Li R, Li Y, Kristiansen K, Wang J. Soap: short oligonucleotide alignment program. Bioinformatics 2008; 24:713–714 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJM et al. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res 2009; 19:1117–1123 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lin S-H, Liao Y-C. Cisa: contig integrator for sequence assembly of bacterial genomes. PLoS One 2013; 8:e60843 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Galperin MY, Makarova KS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:D261–D269 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Li W, Jaroszewski L, Godzik A. Tolerating some redundancy significantly speeds up clustering of large protein databases. Bioinformatics 2002; 18:77–82 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Desper R, Gascuel O. Theoretical foundation of the balanced minimum evolution method of phylogenetic inference and its relationship to weighted least-squares tree fitting. Mol Biol Evol 2004; 21:587–598 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Lefort V, Desper R, Gascuel O. FastME 2.0: a comprehensive, accurate, and fast distance-based phylogeny inference program: table 1. Mol Biol Evol 2015; 32:2798–2800 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Yh H, Cao YP, Jiang HY, Ding T. Genome-wide dissection of the chalcone synthase gene family in Oryza sativa . Mol Breeding 2017; 37:119
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Murray R, Doetsch RN, Robinow CF. Determinative and cytological light microscopy.. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Meth Gen Mol Bacterioj Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 21–41
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Meth Gen Mol Bacteriol Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Bernardet JF, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Piao A-L, Feng X-M, Nogi Y, Han L, Li Y et al. Sphingomonas qilianensis sp. nov., isolated from surface soil in the permafrost region of Qilian Mountains, China. Curr Microbiol 2016; 72:363–369 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Weeks OB. Preliminary studies of the pigments of Flavobacterium breve NCTC 11099 and Flavobacterium odoratum NCTC 11036. In Reichenbach H, Weeks OB. (editors) The Flavobacterium-Cytophaga Group Weinheim: Gesellschaft fu¨r Biotechnologische Forschung; 1981 pp 108–114
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Netwark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Da Costa MS, Albuquerque L, Nobre MF, Wait R. The extraction and identification of respiratory lipoquinones of prokaryotes and their use in taxonomy. Method Microbiol 2011; 38:197–206
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004030
Loading
Dyadobacter bucti sp. nov., isolated from subsurface sediment
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 70, 2281 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004030
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004030
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004030
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error