sp. nov., an anaerobic actinobacterium isolated from human faeces, and emended description of the genus Free

Abstract

A novel actinobacterial strain, designated KGMB04484, was isolated from healthy human faeces sampled in the Republic of Korea. Cells of strain KGMB04484 were strictly anaerobic, Gram-stain-positive, catalase-positive, oxidase-negative, non-motile coccobacilli and formed tiny colonies on Columbia agar with 5 % horse blood. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, strain KGMB04484 was affiliated with the genus in the family and its closest relative was JC110 (96.28 % sequence similarity). The DNA G+C content of strain KGMB04484 was 61.2 mol%. The polar lipids contained diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, an unidentified phospholipid, an unidentified aminolipid and three unidentified glycolipids. The predominant cellular fatty acids (>10 %) of strain KGMB04484 were C, C and C dimethyl acetal. Based on its phylogenetic, physiological and chemotaxonomic characteristics, strain KGMB04484 is considered to represent a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is KGMB04484 (=KCTC 15721=CCUG 72347).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (Award NRF-2016M3A9F3947962)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Jung-Sook Lee
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003958
2020-01-08
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/3/1684.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003958&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Huse SM, Dethlefsen L, Huber JA, Welch DM, Relman DA et al. Exploring microbial diversity and taxonomy using SSU rRNA hypervariable tag sequencing. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:e1000255 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Krajmalnik-Brown R, Ilhan Z-E, Kang D-W, DiBaise JK. Effects of gut microbes on nutrient absorption and energy regulation. Nutr Clin Pract 2012; 27:201–214 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ubeda C, Djukovic A, Isaac S. Roles of the intestinal microbiota in pathogen protection. Clin Transl Immunology 2017; 6:e128 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shibata N, Kunisawa J, Kiyono H. Dietary and microbial metabolites in the regulation of host immunity. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:2171 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Qin J, Li R, Raes J, Arumugam M, Burgdorf KS et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature 2010; 464:59–65 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sommer MOA. Advancing gut microbiome research using cultivation. Curr Opin Microbiol 2015; 27:127–132 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lagier J-C, Elkarkouri K, Rivet R, Couderc C, Raoult D et al. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Senegalemassilia anaerobia gen. nov., sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2013; 7:343–356 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Oren A, Garrity GM. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1–5 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernardet J-F, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B. Subcommittee on the taxonomy of Flavobacterium and Cytophaga-like bacteria of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1049–1070 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hucker GJ. A new modification and application of the gram stain. J Bacteriol 1921; 6:395–397
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gomori G. Preparation of buffers for use in enzyme studies. Methods Enzymol 1955; 1:138–146
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN. editor Mammalian Protein Metabolism 3 NY: Academic Press; 1969 pp 21–132
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha S-M, Na S-I, Yoon S-H et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Nawrocki EP, Burge SW, Bateman A, Daub J, Eberhardt RY et al. Rfam 12.0: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:D130–D137 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:45–48 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:D286–D293 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The seed and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D206–D214 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kanehisa M, Goto S. Kegg: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28:27–30 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Na S-I, Kim YO, Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Komagata K, Suzuki K-I. Lipid and cell-wall analysis on bacterial systematics. In Colwell RR, Grigorova R. (editors) Methods in Microbiology 19 London: Academic Press; 1987 pp 177–182
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003958
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003958
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed