Mycosarcoma aegyptiacum sp. nov., an antagonistic polymorphic basidiomycetous yeast related to smut fungi

References

1. Sipiczki M, Selim SA. Antagonistic yeasts from a salt-lake region in Egypt: identification of a taxonomically distinct group of phylloplane strains related to Sporisorium . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:523–541 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Boekhout T. Pseudozyma Bandoni emend. Boekhout (1985) and a Comparison with the Yeast State of Ustilago maydis (De Candolle) Corda (1842). In Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T. (editors) The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study 2, 5th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011 pp 1857–1868
   [Google Scholar]
3. Wang QM, Begerow D, Groenewald M, Liu XZ, Theelen B et al. Multigene phylogeny and taxonomic revision of yeasts and related fungi in the Ustilaginomycotina. Stud Mycol 2015; 81:55–83 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Pipenberg M. Smut fungi (Ustilaginomycetes p.p. and Microbotryales, Basidiomycota) 86 Flora Neotropica; 2003 pp 1–291
   [Google Scholar]
5. Stoll M, Begerow D, Oberwinkler F. Molecular phylogeny of Ustilago, Sporisorium, and related taxa based on combined analyses of rDNA sequences. Mycol Res 2005; 109:342–356 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
6. McTaggart AR, Shivas RG, Boekhout T, Oberwinkler F, Vánky K et al. Mycosarcoma (Ustilaginaceae), a resurrected generic name for corn smut (Ustilago maydis) and its close relatives with hypertrophied, tubular sori. IMA Fungus 2016; 7:309–315 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994; 22:4673–4680 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), Version 3.67 Seattle, USA: Department of Genome Sciences University of Washington; 2007
   [Google Scholar]
9. Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W et al. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst Biol 2010; 59:307–321 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 2012; 61:539–542 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Felsenstein J, Churchill GA. A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Mol Biol Evol 1996; 13:93–104 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Posada D. jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging. Mol Biol Evol 2008; 25:1253–1256 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Saccone C, Lanave C, Pesole G, Preparata G. Influence of base composition on quantitative estimates of gene evolution. Methods Enzymol 1990; 183:570–583 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. McTaggart AR, Shivas RG, Geering AD, Vánky K, Scharaschkin T. Taxonomic revision of Ustilago, Sporisorium and Macalpinomyces . Persoonia 2012; 29:116–132 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Vu D, Groenewald M, Szöke S, Cardinali G, Eberhardt U et al. DNA barcoding analysis of more than 9000 yeast isolates contributes to quantitative thresholds for yeast species and genera delimitation. Stud Mycol 2016; 85:91–105 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Sipiczki M. Candida zemplinina sp. nov., an osmotolerant and psychrotolerant yeast that ferments sweet botrytized wines. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:2079–2083 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Daniel H, Meyer W. Evaluation of ribosomal RNA and actin gene sequences for the identification of ascomycetous yeasts. Int J Food Microbiol 2003; 86:61–78 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Wang Q-M, Theelen B, Groenewald M, Bai F-Y, Boekhout T. Moniliellomycetes and Malasseziomycetes, two new classes in Ustilaginomycotina. Persoonia 2014; 33:41–47 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
19. Vanky K. Taxonomical studies on Ustilaginales. XIII. Mycotaxon 1995; 56:197–216
    [Google Scholar]
20. Wang QM, Jia JH, Bai FY. Pseudozyma hubeiensis sp. nov. and Pseudozyma shanxiensis sp. nov., novel ustilaginomycetous anamorphic yeast species from plant leaves. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:289–293 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
21. Sipiczki M. Dimorphic cycle in Candida citri sp. nov., a novel yeast species isolated from rotting fruit in Borneo. FEMS Yeast Res 2011; 11:202–208 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Oliveira JVdeC, Borges TA, Corrêa dos Santos RA, Freitas LFD, Rosa CA et al. Pseudozyma brasiliensis sp. nov., a xylanolytic, ustilaginomycetous yeast species isolated from an insect pest of sugarcane roots. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2159–2168 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
23. van der Walt JP, Yarrow D. Methods for the isolation, maintenance, classification and identification of yeasts. In Kreger-van Rij NJW. editor The Yeasts, a Taxonomic Study, 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1984 pp 45–104
    [Google Scholar]