1887

Abstract

Designated strain K5 was isolated from soil on Jeju Island. The bacterium was aerobic, Gram-stain-negative, oxidase-positive, catalase-low activity, motile, short-rod shaped, opaque and formed white colonies that were circular, raised and had entire margins. Strain K5 was able to grow at 15–40 °C, pH 4–9 and at 0–2 % (w/v) NaCl concentration. Phylogenetic analysis based on its 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain K5 is closely related to A15 (98.9 % sequence similarity), Sp-1 (98.7 %) and LM-6T (97.4 %). The sole respiratory quinone was determined to be ubiquinone-10. The dominant fatty acids of strain K5 were summed feature 8 (C ω / Cω, 29.8 %), C cyclo ω8 (20.2 %) and C (24.4 %). DNA G+C content was 63.6 % and DNA–DNA relatedness between strain K5 and other three members of the genus ranged from 24 to 28 %. The major polar lipids were identified as phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine and aminolipids. Moreover, polyphasic characterization revealed that strain K5 represents a novel species in the genus for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is K5 (=KCCM 43295=LMG 30611).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Soo-Je Park , National Institute of Biological Resources , (Award NIBR201801106)
  • Soo-Je Park , National Research Foundation of Korea , (Award 2018R1C1B6006762)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003872
2020-01-30
2021-03-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/2/1042.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003872&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sorokina AY, Chernousova EY, Dubinina GA. Ferrovibrio denitrificans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel neutrophilic facultative anaerobic Fe(II)-oxidizing bacterium. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2012; 335:19–25 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Song M, Zhang L, Sun B, Zhang H, Ding H et al. Ferrovibrio xuzhouensis sp. nov., a cyhalothrin-degrading bacterium isolated from cyhalothrin contaminated wastewater. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 108:377–382 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Dahal RH, Kim J. Ferrovibrio soli sp. nov., a novel cellulolytic bacterium isolated from stream bank soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:427–431 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Koh HW, Hong H, Min UG, Kang MS, Kim SG et al. Rhodanobacter aciditrophus sp. nov., an acidophilic bacterium isolated from mine wastewater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4574–4579 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Thompson J, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kimura M. The neutral theory of molecular evolution and the world view of the neutralists. Genome 1989; 31:24–31 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 2013; 10:563–569 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP et al. Ncbi prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:6614–6624 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Blin K, Shaw S, Steinke K, Villebro R, Ziemert N et al. antiSMASH 5.0: updates to the secondary metabolite genome mining pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 2019; 47:W81–W87 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the AD hoc Committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial Systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Webley DM, Farmer VC. A simple method for producing microcultures in hanging drops with special reference to organisms utilizing oils. J Gen Microbiol 1953; 8:66–71 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim SJ, Park SJ, Cha IT, Min D, Kim JS et al. Metabolic versatility of toluene-degrading, iron-reducing bacteria in tidal flat sediment, characterized by stable isotope probing-based metagenomic analysis. Environ Microbiol 2014; 16:189–204 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Komagata K, Suzuki K-I. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial Systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hu HY, Fujie K, Urano K. Development of a novel solid phase extraction method for the analysis of bacterial quinones in activated sludge with a higher reliability. J Biosci Bioeng 1999; 87:378–382 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003872
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003872
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error