Skip to content
1887

Abstract

Two yellow-pigmented, Gram-stain-negative and rod-shaped bacterial strains, designated as RY24 and ZYY160, were isolated from rice. Results of phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strains RY24 and ZYY160 belonged to the genus , and the 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity was 100 % The DNA homology between the two strains was 99.7 %. The 16S rRNA and gene sequences of the two strains showed highest similarity values to CGMCC 1.3392 and DSM 15758 (sharing 99.31 and 94.34 %, respectively). The major fatty acids of two strains were identified as summed feature 8 (Cω7 and/or Cω6), C and summed feature 3 (Cω7 and/or Cω6), and the major respiratory quinone was identified as ubiquinone Q-9, which are typical chemotaxonomic features of members of the genus . The genomic DNA G+C contents of strains RY24 and ZYY160 were determined to be 64.25 and 64.21 mol%, respectively. The DNA–DNA relatedness and average nucleotide identity values between the two strains and their closely related type strains were below 36 and 90 %, which supported that RY24 and ZYY160 represent a novel species in the genus . Phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic evidence, together with phenotypic characteristics, showed that the two isolates constitute a novel species of the genus . The type strain is RY24 (JCM 33201=ACCC 61555), for which the name sp. nov. is proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003852
2019-11-21
2025-02-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/2/944.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003852&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Palleroni NJ. Genus I Pseudomonas Migula. In Krieg NR, Holt JG. (editors) Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology 1 Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1984 pp 141–199
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Las Heras A, Domínguez L, López I, Fernández-Garayzábal JF, Al H. Outbreak of acute ovine mastitis associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Vet Rec 1999; 145:111–112 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Stanier RY, Palleroni NJ, Doudoroff M. The aerobic pseudomonads: a taxonomic study. J Gen Microbiol 1966; 43:159–271 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Palleroni NJ. Pseudomonas classification. A new case history in the taxonomy of gram-negative bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 1994; 64:231
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Elkin S, Geddes D. Pseudomonal infection in cystic fibrosis: the battle continues. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2003; 1:609–618 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gupta SK, Kumari R, Prakash O, Lal R, Sanjay KG. Pseudomonas panipatensis sp. nov., isolated from an oil-contaminated site. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1339–1345 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Anurat P, Duangmal K, Srisuk N. Pseudomonas mangiferae sp. nov., isolated from bark of mango tree in Thailand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:3537–3543 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wei Y, Mao H, Xu Y, Zou W, Fang J et al. Pseudomonas abyssi sp. nov., isolated from the abyssopelagic water of the Mariana Trench. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2462–2467 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Genus I. Pseudomonas Orla-Jensen 1921, 270 AL. In Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JR. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (The Proteobacteria part B The Gammaproteobacteria) Vol. 2, 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2005 pp 323–379
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sun L, Qiu F, Zhang X, Dai X, Dong X et al. Endophytic bacterial diversity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots estimated by 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Microb Ecol 2008; 55:415–424 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kawai M, Matsutera E, Kanda H, Yamaguchi N, Tani K et al. 16S ribosomal DNA-based analysis of bacterial diversity in purified water used in pharmaceutical manufacturing processes by PCR and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2002; 68:699–704 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang X, Sun L, Qiu F, McLean RJC, Jiang R et al. Rheinheimera tangshanensis sp. nov., a rice root-associated bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2420–2424 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Huq MA. Caenispirillum humi sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from the soil of Korean pine garden. Arch Microbiol 2018; 200:343–348 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang L, Wang Y, Dai J, Tang Y, Yang Q et al. Bacillus korlensis sp. nov., a moderately halotolerant bacterium isolated from a sand soil sample in China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1787–1792 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. A laboratory manual: international edition. Microbiology 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaiser P, Geyer R, Surmann P, Fuhrmann H. Lc-Ms method for screening unknown microbial carotenoids and isoprenoid quinones. J Microbiol Methods 2012; 88:28–34 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim O-S, Cho Y-J, Lee K, Yoon S-H, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Schubert M, Lindgreen S, Orlando L. AdapterRemoval V2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC Res Notes 2016; 9:88 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Coil D, Jospin G, Darling AE. A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from illumina MiSeq data. Bioinformatics 2015; 31:587–589 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. John BE, Bass L. Usability and software architecture. Behav Inf Technol 2001; 20:329–338 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403–410 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:955–964 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Garrido-Sanz D, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Martín M, Rivilla R et al. Correction: Genomic and Genetic Diversity within the Pseudomonas fluorescens Complex. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0153733 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Hauser E, Kämpfer P, Busse H-J. Pseudomonas psychrotolerans sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1633–1637 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kodama K, Kimura N, Komagata K. Two new species of Pseudomonas: P. oryzihabitans isolated from rice paddy and clinical specimens and P. luteola isolated from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1985; 35:467–474 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003852
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003852
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error