Pseudomonas bubulae sp. nov., isolated from beef

References

1. Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1997; 47:590–592 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Parte AC. LPSN-List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:D613–D616 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Jackson TC, Acuff GR, Dickson JS. Meat, Poultry and Seafood. In Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, Montville TJ. (editors) Food Microbiology - Fundamentals and Frontiers Washington D.C: ASM Press; 1997 pp 83–100
   [Google Scholar]
4. Molin G, Ternström A. Phenotypically based taxonomy of psychrotrophic Pseudomonas isolated from spoiled meat, water, and soil. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:257–274 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Nychas GJE, Marshall DL, Meat SJN. Poultry and Seafood - Microbial Spoilage and Public Health Concerns. In Boyle MP, Beuchat LR. (editors) Food Microbiology - Fundamentals and Frontiers Washington, D.C: ASM Press; 2007 pp 105–140
   [Google Scholar]
6. Shaw BG, Latty JB. A study of the relative incidence of different Pseudomonas groups on meat using a computer-assisted identification technique employing only carbon source tests. J Appl Bacteriol 1984; 57:59–67 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
7. Molin G, Ternström A, Ursing J. Notes: Pseudomonas lundensis, a new bacterial species isolated from meat. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1986; 36:339–342 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Versalovic J, Koeuth T, Lupski JR. Distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in eubacteria and application to fingerprinting of bacterial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1991; 19:6823–6831 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hilario E, Buckley TR, Young JM. Improved resolution on the phylogenetic relationships among Pseudomonas by the combined analysis of atpD, carA, recA and 16S rDNA. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2004; 86:51–64 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Mulet M, Lalucat J, García-Valdés E. DNA sequence-based analysis of the Pseudomonas species. Environ Microbiol 2010; 12:1513–1530 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Yamamoto S, Harayama S. Phylogenetic relationships of Pseudomonas putida strains deduced from the nucleotide sequences of gyrB, rpoD and 16S rRNA genes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1998; 48:813–819 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Adékambi T, Shinnick TM, Raoult D, Drancourt M. Complete rpoB gene sequencing as a suitable supplement to DNA-DNA hybridization for bacterial species and genus delineation. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1807–1814 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Genomic insights that advance the species definition for prokaryotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:2567–2572 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dahllöf I, Baillie H, Kjelleberg S. rpoB-based microbial community analysis avoids limitations inherent in 16S rRNA gene intraspecies heterogeneity. Appl Environ Microbiol 2000; 66:3376–3380 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
16. Sharma V, Patil PB. Resolving the phylogenetic and taxonomic relationship of Xanthomonas and Stenotrophomonas strains using complete rpoB gene sequence. PLoS Curr 2011; 3:RRN1239 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
17. Ait Tayeb L, Ageron E, Grimont F, Grimont PAD. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Pseudomonas based on rpoB sequences and application for the identification of isolates. Res Microbiol 2005; 156:763–773 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lane DJ. 16S/23S rRNA Sequencing. In Goodfellow S. editor Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp 115–148
    [Google Scholar]
19. Olofsson TC, Ahrné S, Molin G. Composition of the bacterial population of refrigerated beef, identified with direct 16S rRNA gene analysis and pure culture technique. Int J Food Microbiol 2007; 118:233–240 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hall TA. BioEdit, A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for windows 95/98/NT; version 7.2.5. (2013). Nucl Acids Symp 199995–98
    [Google Scholar]
21. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
22. Yumoto I, Kusano T, Shingyo T, Nodasaka Y, Matsuyama H et al. Assignment of Pseudomonas sp. strain E-3 to Pseudomonas psychrophila sp. nov., a new facultatively psychrophilic bacterium. Extremophiles 2001; 5:343–349 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
23. Eichholz W. Erdbeerbacillus (Bacterium fragi). Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg 1902425–428
    [Google Scholar]
24. von Neubeck M, Huptas C, Glück C, Krewinkel M, Stoeckel M et al. Pseudomonas helleri sp. nov. and Pseudomonas weihenstephanensis sp. nov., isolated from raw cow's milk. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:1163–1173 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
25. Ramírez-Bahena M-H, Cuesta MJ, Igual JM, Tejedor C, Fernández-Pascual M et al. Pseudomonas endophytica sp. nov., isolated from stem tissue of Solanum tuberosum L. in Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2110–2117 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
26. See-Too WS, Salazar S, Ee R, Convey P, Chan KG et al. Pseudomonas versuta sp. nov., isolated from Antarctic soil. Syst Appl Microbiol 2017; 40:191–198 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
27. Carrión O, Miñana-Galbis D, Montes MJ, Mercadé E, Jesús Montes M. Pseudomonas deceptionensis sp. nov., a psychrotolerant bacterium from the Antarctic. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2401–2405 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
28. Haynes WC, Burkholder WH. Pseudomonas In: Breed, Murray, Smith (editors). Bergey`s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. Baltimore: The Williams and Wilkins C 195789–152
    [Google Scholar]
29. JGI –Joint genome Institute JGI bacterial DNA isolation CTAB-2012. https://jgi.doe.gov/user-program-info/pmo-overview/protocols-sample-preparation-information
30. Nurk S, Bankevich A, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Korobeynikov A et al. Assembling single-cell genomes and mini-metagenomes from chimeric MDA products. J Comput Biol 2013; 20:714–737 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
31. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
32. Blom J, Kreis J, Spänig S, Juhre T, Bertelli C et al. EDGAR 2.0: an enhanced software platform for comparative gene content analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 2016; 44:W22–W28 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
33. Blom J, Albaum SP, Doppmeier D, Pühler A, Vorhölter FJ et al. EDGAR: a software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 2009; 10:14 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
34. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
35. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
36. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2-Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 2010; 5:e9490 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
37. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
38. King EO, Ward MK, Raney DE. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescin. J Lab Clin Med 1954; 44:301–307
    [Google Scholar]
39. Powers EM. Efficacy of the Ryu nonstaining KOH technique for rapidly determining gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:3756–3758
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ryu E. A simple method of differentiation between gram-positive and gram-negative organisms without staining. Kitasato Arch Exp Med 1940; 17:58–63
    [Google Scholar]
41. Xu P, Li WJ, Tang SK, Zhang YQ, Chen GZ et al. Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family 'Oxalobacteraceae' isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1149–1153 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
42. Miller LT. Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:584–586
    [Google Scholar]
43. Kuykendall LD, Roy MA, O'Neill JJ, Devine TE. Fatty acids, antibiotic resistance, and deoxyribonucleic acid homology groups of Bradyrhizobium japonicum . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988; 38:358–361 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
44. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ. A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Physiol 1959; 37:911–917 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
45. Tindall BJ. A comparative study of the lipid composition of Halobacterium saccharovorum from various sources. Syst Appl Microbiol 1990; 13:128–130 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
46. Tindall BJ. Lipid composition of Halobacterium lacusprofundi . FEMS Microbiol Lett 1990; 66:199–202 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
47. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy C, Beverage T, Breznak JA, Marzluf G, Schmidt TM. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology Washington. DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
48. Moore EB, Tindall B, Martins Dos Santos VP, Pieper D, Ramos JL. Nonmedical: Pseudomonas . In Dworkin M SF, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E. (editors) The Prokaryotes New York: Springer; 2006 p 57
    [Google Scholar]
49. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1999; 16:1114–1116 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]