1887

Abstract

A new mesophilic bacterium, designated strain 13-15A, was isolated from the deep-sea water from the Carlsberg Ridge, northwestern Indian Ocean. Cells were short rods and motile with a single polar flagellum. Growth was observed in the presence of 85–1700 mM NaCl (optimum 680 mM), at 10–45 °C (optimum, 28 °C) and pH 5.0–9.0 (optimum, pH 7.0). The isolate was an obligate chemolithoautotroph capable of growth using thiosulfate, sulfide, elemental sulfur or tetrathionate as the sole energy source, carbon dioxide as the sole carbon source, and molecular oxygen as the sole electron acceptor. Molecular hydrogen did not support growth. The major fatty acids were C (45.0 %), C (22.5 %) and C (20.1 %). The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 41.6 mol%. The results of phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that the novel isolate belonged to the genus and was most closely related to MAS2 (94.8 % sequence similarity). On the basis of the taxonomic data obtained in this study, strain 13-15A represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain 13-15A (=MCCC 1A13986=KCTC 15750).

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (Award No. 41672333)
    • Principle Award Recipient: Zongze Shao
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003744
2020-02-03
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/70/1/234.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003744&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Boden R, Scott KM, Williams J, Russel S, Antonen K et al. An evaluation of Thiomicrospira, Hydrogenovibrio and Thioalkalimicrobium: reclassification of four species of Thiomicrospira to each Thiomicrorhabdus gen. nov. and Hydrogenovibrio, and reclassification of all four species of Thioalkalimicrobium to Thiomicrospira . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1140–1151
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brinkhoff T, Muyzer G, Wirsen CO, Kuever J. Thiomicrospira chilensis sp. nov., a mesophilic obligately chemolithoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium isolated from a Thioploca mat. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:875–879 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Knittel K et al. Thiomicrospira arctica sp. nov. and Thiomicrospira psychrophila sp. nov., psychrophilic, obligately chemolithoautotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacteria isolated from marine Arctic sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:781–786 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Scott KM, Williams J, Cmb P, Russel S, Harmer TL et al. Genomes of ubiquitous marine and hypersaline Hydrogenovibrio, Thiomicrorhabdus, and Thiomicrospira spp. encode a diversity of mechanisms to sustain chemolithoautotrophy in heterogeneous environments. Environ Microbiol 2018
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Brinkhoff T, Muyzer G, Wirsen CO, Kuever J. Thiomicrospira kuenenii sp. nov. and Thiomicrospira frisia sp. nov., two mesophilic obligately chemolithoautotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria isolated from an intertidal mud flat. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:385392 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Boden R, Scott KM, Rae AW, Hutt LP. Reclassification of Thiomicrospira hydrogeniphila (Watsuji et al. 2016) to Thiomicrorhabdus hydrogenophila comb. nov., with emended description of Thiomicrorhabdus (Boden et al., 2017). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:42054209 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Watsuji TO, Hada E, Miyazaki M, Ichimura M, Takai K. Thiomicrospira hydrogeniphila sp. nov., an aerobic, hydrogen- and sulfur-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph isolated from a seawater tank containing a block of beef tallow. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3688–3693 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Takai K, Inagaki F, Nakagawa S, Hirayama H, Nunoura T et al. Isolation and phylogenetic diversity of members of previously uncultivated epsilon-Proteobacteria in deep-sea hydrothermal fields. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2003; 218:167–174
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Jiang L, Lyu J, Shao Z. Sulfur Metabolism of Hydrogenovibrio thermophilus Strain S5 and Its Adaptations to Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vent Environment. Front Microbiol 2017; 8:2513 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Balch W, Fox G, Magrum L, Woese C, Wolfe R. Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group. Microbiological reviews 1979; 43:260
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Jiang LJ, Zheng YP, Peng XT, Zhou HY, Zhang CL et al. Vertical distribution and diversity of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes in the pearl river estuarine sediments, southern China. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2010; 70:93–106
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu C, Shao Z. Alcanivorax dieselolei sp. nov., a novel alkane-degrading bacterium isolated from sea water and deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1181–1186 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Altschul S et al. Gapped blast and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:33893402 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoon S-H, S-M H, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically United database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ok-Sun K, Yong-Joon C, Kihyun L, Seok-Hwan Y, Mincheol K et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Statistical properties of the ordinary least-squares, generalized least-squares, and minimum-evolution methods of phylogenetic inference. J Mol Evol 1992; 35:367–375 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SI N, Kim YO, Yoon SH, SM H, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Mol Evol 2018; 56:1–6
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 2012; 1:18 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994; 44:846–849 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003744
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003744
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error