1887

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the two type strains of 908087 and PIN1 was performed to examine their taxonomic relationship. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of 908087 shared a high similarity (99.8 %) with that of PIN1. The phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that the two strains formed a tight cluster within the genus . Whole genomic comparison between the two strains revealed a digital DNA–DNA hybridization estimate of 75.8 % and an average nucleotide identity value of 97.3 %, strongly indicating that they represented a single species. In addition, the strains did not display any striking differences in their metabolic, physiological or chemotaxonomic features. Therefore, we propose that is a later heterotypic synonym of .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003678
2019-09-05
2019-09-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Jean WD, Leu TY, Lee CY, Chu TJ, Lin SY et al. Pseudidiomarina marina sp. nov. and Pseudidiomarina tainanensis sp. nov. and reclassification of Idiomarina homiensis and Idiomarina salinarum as Pseudidiomarina homiensis comb. nov. and Pseudidiomarina salinarum comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009;59:53–59 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Wu YH, Shen YQ, Xu XW, Wang CS, Oren A et al. Pseudidiomarina donghaiensis sp. nov. and Pseudidiomarina maritima sp. nov., isolated from the East China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009;59:1321–1325 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010;2:142–148 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:19126–19131 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu Y, Lai Q, Shao Z. Genome-based analysis reveals the taxonomy and diversity of the family Idiomarinaceae. Front Microbiol 2018;9:2453 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lai Q, Liu Y, Yuan J, du J, Wang L et al. Multilocus sequence analysis for assessment of phylogenetic diversity and biogeography in Thalassospira bacteria from diverse marine environments. PLoS One 2014;9:e106353 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:1613–1617 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 2018;35:1547–1549 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4:406–425 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981;17:368–376 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol 1993;10:1073–1095 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985;39:783–791 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Ivanova EP, Romanenko LA, Chun J, Matte MH, Matte GR et al. Idiomarina gen. nov., comprising novel indigenous deep-sea bacteria from the Pacific Ocean, including descriptions of two species, Idiomarina abyssalis sp. nov. and Idiomarina zobellii sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000;50 Pt 2:901–907 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:346–351 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010;2:117–134 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017;110:1281–1286 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the Ad Hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987;37:463–464 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Tindall BJ, Rosselló-Móra R, Busse HJ, Ludwig W, Kämpfer P. Notes on the characterization of prokaryote strains for taxonomic purposes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010;60:249–266 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Poddar A, Lepcha RT, Mukherjee D, Bhattacharyya D, das SK. Comparative analysis of 16S rRNA signature sequences of the genus Idiomarina and Idiomarina woesei sp. nov., a novel marine bacterium isolated from the Andaman Sea. Res Microbiol 2014;165:501–507 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. International code of nomenclature of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019;69:S1–S111 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003678
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003678
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error