1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, aerobic and non-motile strain, designated 18x22-1, was isolated from a forest soil sample collected from Limushan Nature Reserve in Hainan Province, PR China. Growth occurred at 15–37 °C and pH 6.0–8.0 without NaCl. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses showed that strain 18x22-1 was closely related to DSM 14655 (98.5 %), followed by DSM 14656 (97.9 %) and other species and formed a stable cluster with DSM 14655, DSM 14656, JCM 19319 and s CCTCC AB 2015357. Results of chemotaxonomic analyses showed that ubiquinone-8 (Q-8) was the major respiratory quinone, and the major fatty acids (>10 % of the total amounts) were C and Ccyclo. The major polar lipids were phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylcholine, two unidentified aminopholipids and four unidentified phospholipids. The draft genome sequence was 4.47 Mb long with a G+C content of 68.9 mol%. The average nucleotide identity and digital DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain 18x22-1 and four closely related type strains were in the range of 79.3–82.3 % and 21.9–25.1 %, respectively. The results of phenotypic, phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses supported that strain 18x22-1 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is 18x22-1 (=GDMCC 1.1584=KCTC 52922).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003641
2019-11-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/11/3460.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003641&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Heulin T et al. Ramlibacter tataouinensis gen. nov., sp. nov., and Ramlibacter henchirensis sp. nov., cyst-producing bacteria isolated from subdesert soil in Tunisia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2003; 53:589–594 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee HJ, Lee SH, Lee S-S, Lee JS, Kim Y et al. Ramlibacter solisilvae sp. nov., isolated from forest soil, and emended description of the genus Ramlibacter . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1317–1322 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Liang W, Ds A, Kim SG, Jin FX, Kim SC et al. Ramlibacter ginsenosidimutans sp. nov., with ginsenoside-converting activity. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2012; 22:311–315
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Yan ZF, Trinh H, Moya G, Lin P, Li CT et al. Ramlibacter rhizophilus sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of national flower Mugunghwa from South Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3773–3777 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee D-H, Cha C-J. Ramlibacter alkalitolerans sp. nov., alkali-tolerant bacterium isolated from soil of ginseng. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4619–4623 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chaudhary DK, Kim J. Ramlibacter monticola sp. nov., isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4468–4474 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Reichenbach H, Dworkin M. The Myxobacteria. In Balows A, Trüper HG, Dworkin M, Harder W, Schleifer KH et al. (editors) The Prokaryotes, 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 1992 pp. 3416–3487
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kieser T, Bibb MJ, Butttner MJ, Chater KF, Hopwood DA et al. Practical Streptomyces Genetics Norwich, England: John Inner Foundation; 2000
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Yoon SH, Sm H, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing ezbiocloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. Theoretical foundation of the minimum-evolution method of phylogenetic inference. Mol Bio Evol 1993; 10:1073–1095
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha SM, Na SI, Yoon SH et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoon S-H, Ha S-Min, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Goris J, Klappenbach JA, Vandamme P, Coenye T, Konstantinidis KT et al. DNA–DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:81–91 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Powers EM. Efficacy of the Ryu nonstaining KOH technique for rapidly determining gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:3756–3758
    [Google Scholar]
  24. James BW, Mauchline WS, Dennis PJ, Keevil CW, Wait R. Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate in Legionella pneumophila, an energy source for survival in low-nutrient environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999; 44:910–912
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996; 42:457–469 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Reddy CA, Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Microbiology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 2007 pp. 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003641
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003641
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error