sp. nov. recovered from human wound secretion in China Free

Abstract

A novel strain WCHEs120001 was recovered from the wound secretion of a patient at West China Hospital, Chengdu, PR China, in 2017. The strain was Gram-stain-negative, facultatively anaerobic, motile, and non-spore-forming. A preliminary analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence revealed that this strain was closely related to members of the genus . The strain was subjected to whole genome sequencing. Phylogenetic analysis based on core gene sequences of type strains of all species revealed that this strain belonged to the genus but were distinct from any previously known species. Both average nucleotide identity (ANI) and DNA–DNA hybridisation (isDDH) values between strain WCHEs120001 and type strains of all known species were 82.02 to 92.37% and 25.6 to 50.9 %, respectively, which are lower than the 95 % (ANI) and 70 % (isDDH) cutoff for species delineation. The major fatty acids of the strain WCHEs120001 are C, sum of Cω7/Cω6 and Cω7, which are similar to other species. Genomic DNA G+C content of strain WCHEs120001 was 53.33 mol%. Strain WCHEs120001 is positive for methyl--glucopyranoside but does not ferment adonitol, -arabitol, dulcitol and melibiose, which distinguishes it from all other species. Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics indicate that strain WCHEs120001 represents a novel species of the genus for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of sp. nov. is WCHEs120001 (=GDMCC1.1570=NCTC 14272).

Keyword(s): genome , Kosakonia and secretion
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003606
2019-10-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/10/3155.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003606&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Brady C, Cleenwerck I, Venter S, Coutinho T, de Vos P. Taxonomic evaluation of the genus Enterobacter based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA): proposal to reclassify E. nimipressuralis and E. amnigenus into Lelliottia gen. nov. as Lelliottia nimipressuralis comb. nov. and Lelliottia amnigena comb. nov., respectively, E. gergoviae and E. pyrinus into Pluralibacter gen. nov. as Pluralibacter gergoviae comb. nov. and Pluralibacter pyrinus comb. nov., respectively, E. cowanii, E. radicincitans, E. oryzae and E. arachidis into Kosakonia gen. nov. as Kosakonia cowanii comb. nov., Kosakonia radicincitans comb. nov., Kosakonia oryzae comb. nov. and Kosakonia arachidis comb. nov., respectively, and E. turicensis, E. helveticus and E. pulveris into Cronobacter as Cronobacter zurichensis nom. nov., Cronobacter helveticus comb. nov. and Cronobacter pulveris comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genera Enterobacter and Cronobacter . Syst Appl Microbiol 2013; 36:309–319 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhu B, Zhou Q, Lin L, Hu C, Shen P et al. Enterobacter sacchari sp. nov., a nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugar cane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2577–2582 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Li CY, Zhou YL, Ji J, Gu CT. Reclassification of Enterobacter oryziphilus and Enterobacter oryzendophyticus as Kosakonia oryziphila comb. nov. and Kosakonia oryzendophytica comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2780–2783 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gu CT, Li CY, Yang LJ, Huo GC. Enterobacter xiangfangensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese traditional sourdough, and reclassification of Enterobacter sacchari Zhu et al. 2013 as Kosakonia sacchari comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2650–2656 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kämpfer P, Mcinroy JA, Doijad S, Chakraborty T, Glaeser SP. Kosakonia pseudosacchari sp. nov., an endophyte of Zea mays. Syst Appl Microbiol 2016; 39:1–7 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. CLSI Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Seventh Informational Supplement. M100-S27 Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lane D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp. 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Chan JZ, Halachev MR, Loman NJ, Constantinidou C, Pallen MJ. Defining bacterial species in the genomic era: insights from the genus Acinetobacter . BMC Microbiol 2012; 12:302 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Graham PH, Sadowsky MJ, Keyser HH, Barnet YM, Bradley RS et al. Proposed minimal standards for the description of new genera and species of root- and stem-nodulating bacteria. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1991; 41:582–587 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wayne LG. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology: announcement of the report of the ad hoc Committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A 1988; 268:433–434[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp. 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mormak DA, Casida LE. Study of Bacillus subtilis endospores in soil by use of a modified endospore stain. Appl Environ Microbiol 1985; 49:1356–1360[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu W, Feng Y, Zong Z. Enterobacter sichuanensis sp. nov., recovered from human urine. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3922–3927 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wu W, Wei L, Feng Y, Kang M, Zong Z. Enterobacter huaxiensis sp. nov. and Enterobacter chuandaensis sp. nov., recovered from human blood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:708–714 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Emms DM, Kelly S. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biol 2015; 16:157 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:3059–3066 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Qin QL, Xie BB, Zhang XY, Chen XL, Zhou BC et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J Bacteriol 2014; 196:2210–2215 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003606
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003606
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed