Rule 24b of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes and regulating the priority of names and epithets considered to be associated with heterotypic synonyms

References

1. Parker CT, Tindall BJ, Garrity GM. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:S1–S111 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
2. Skerman VBD, Sneath PHA, McGowan V. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1980; 30:225–420 [View Article]
   [Google Scholar]
3. Whitman WB, Lawson PA, Losey NA. Response to Tindall (2014) on the legitimacy of the names Solimonadaceae Losey et al. 2013, Xanthomonadaceae Saddler and Bradbury 2005 and Xanthomonadales Saddler and Bradbury 2005. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1086–1087 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
4. Rosselló-Móra R, Whitman WB. Dialogue on the nomenclature and classification of prokaryotes. Syst Appl Microbiol 2019; 42:5–14 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
5. Liu Q, Liu HC, Zhou YG, Xin YH. Stenotrophobium rhamnosiphilum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a glacier, proposal of Steroidobacteraceae fam. nov. in Nevskiales and emended description of the family Nevskiaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1404–1410 in press [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
6. Tindall BJ. When treated as heterotypic synonyms the names Caryophanaceae Peshkoff 1939 (Approved Lists 1980) and Caryophanales Peshkoff 1939 (Approved Lists 1980) have priority over the names Planococcaceae Krasil'nikov 1949 (Approved Lists 1980) and Bacillales Prévot 1953 (Approved Lists 1980) respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019
   [Google Scholar]
7. Tindall BJ. A commentary on the interpretation of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2334–2336 [View Article][PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
8. Castellani A, Chalmers AJ. Manual of Tropical Medicine, 3rd ed. New York: Williams Wood and Co; 1919
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brenner DJ, Fanning GR, Skerman FJ, Falkow S. Polynucleotide sequence divergence among strains of Escherichia coli and closely related organisms. J Bacteriol 1972; 109:953–965[PubMed]
   [Google Scholar]
10. Brenner DJ, Fanning GR, Miklos GV, Steigerwalt AG. Polynucleotide sequence relatedness among Shigella species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1973; 23:1–7 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
11. Zuo G, Xu Z, Hao B. Shigella strains are not clones of Escherichia coli but sister species in the genus Escherichia . Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2013; 11:61–65 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kämpfer P, Rückert C, Blom J, Goesmann A, Wink J et al. Streptomyces phaeopurpureus Shinobu 1957 (Approved Lists 1980) and Streptomyces griseorubiginosus (Ryabova and Preobrazhenskaya 1957) Pridham et al. 1958 (Approved Lists 1980) are heterotypic subjective synonyms. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3111–3116 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
13. Abraham WR, Strömpl C, Meyer H, Lindholst S, Moore ER et al. Phylogeny and polyphasic taxonomy of Caulobacter species. Proposal of Maricaulis gen. nov. with Maricaulis maris (Poindexter) comb. nov. as the type species, and emended description of the genera Brevundimonas and Caulobacter . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:1053–1073 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
14. Poindexter JS. Biological properties and classification of the caulobacter group. Bacteriol Rev 1964; 28:231–295[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]