1887

Abstract

A novel actinobacterial strain, designated KGMB04489, was isolated from the faeces of a healthy Korean. Cells of the strain were strictly anaerobic, Gram-stain-positive and short-rod-shaped. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, strain KGMB04489 belonged to the genus and was most closely related to SK9K4 (94.3 %), ATCC 49627 (93.5 %), lac31 (93.4 %) and D315A-29 (93.3 %). The major end product was lactic acid. The DNA G+C content was 65.5 mol%. The major cellular fatty acids of strain KGMB04489 were C 9, C 9 DMA and C. Strain KGMB04489 contained -diaminopimelic acid as the diamino acid in the peptidoglycan. The polar lipids consisted of an unidentified phospholipid, six unidentified glycolipids and an unidentified lipid. Based on phylogenetic, physiological and chemotaxonomic characteristics, strain KGMB04489 is considered to represent a novel species within the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is KGMB04489 (=KCTC 15699=CCUG 72345).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003469
2019-08-01
2019-08-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Tzellas N, Coleman B, Downes J et al. Characterization of novel human oral isolates and cloned 16S rDNA sequences that fall in the family Coriobacteriaceae: description of olsenella gen. nov., reclassification of Lactobacillus uli as Olsenella uli comb. nov. and description of Olsenella profusa sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001;51:1797–1804 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Zhi XY, Li WJ, Stackebrandt E. An update of the structure and 16S rRNA gene sequence-based definition of higher ranks of the class Actinobacteria, with the proposal of two new suborders and four new families and emended descriptions of the existing higher taxa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009;59:589–608 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kraatz M, Wallace RJ, Svensson L. Olsenella umbonata sp. nov., a microaerotolerant anaerobic lactic acid bacterium from the sheep rumen and pig jejunum and emended descriptions of Olsenella, Olsenella uli and Olsenella profusa. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011;61:795–803 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: a folder available on the internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997;47:590–592 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Li X, Jensen RL, Højberg O, Canibe N, Jensen BB. Olsenella scatoligenes sp. nov., a 3-methylindole- (skatole) and 4-methylphenol- (p-cresol) producing bacterium isolated from pig faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015;65:1227–1233 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Göker M, Held B, Lucas S, Nolan M, Yasawong M et al. Complete genome sequence of Olsenella uli type strain (VPI D76D-27C). Stand Genomic Sci 2010;3:76–84 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature 2011;474:327–336 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Thursby E, Juge N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J 2017;474:1823–1836 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernardet JF, Nakagawa Y, Holmes B.. Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Flavobacterium and Cytophaga-like Bacteria of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes Proposed minimal standards for describing new taxa of the family Flavobacteriaceae and emended description of the family. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002;52:1049–1070 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hucker GJ. A new modification and application of the Gram stain. J Bacteriol 1921;6:395–397[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991;173:697–703 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:1613–1617 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 1999;41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4:406–425 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971;20:406–416 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981;17:368–376 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. Evolution of protein molecules. In Munro HN. (editor) Mammalian Protein Metabolismvol. 3 NY: Academic Press; 1969; pp.21–132
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016;33:1870–1874 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985;39:783–791 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha SM, Na SI, Yoon SH et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017;67:2053–2057 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015;25:1043–1055 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hyatt D, Chen GL, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 2010;11:119 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lowe TM, Eddy SR. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:955–964 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nawrocki EP, Burge SW, Bateman A, Daub J, Eberhardt RY et al. Rfam 12.0: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res 2015;43:D130–D137 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Bairoch A, Apweiler R. The SWISS-PROT protein sequence database and its supplement TrEMBL in 2000. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:45–48 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:D286–D293 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D206–D214 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:27–30 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Shin YK, Lee JS, Chun CO, Kim HJ, Park YH. Isoprenoid quinone profiles of Leclercia adecarboxylata KCTC 1036T. J Microbiol Biotechnol 1996;6:68–69
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 1972;36:407–477[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Komagata K, Suzuki K-I. Lipid and cell-wall analysis on bacterial systematics. In Colwell RR, Grigorova R. (editors) Methods in Microbiologyvol. 19 London: Academic Press; 1987; pp.177–182
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017;110:1281–1286 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013;14:60 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P et al. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007;57:81–91 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Han KI, Kang SW, Kim JS, Lee KC, Eom MK et al. Draft genome sequence of Olsenella sp. KGMB 04484 isolated from healthy korean human feces. Korean J Microbiol 2018;54:456–459
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003469
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003469
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error