Serinicoccus sediminis sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment Free

Abstract

A novel Gram-strain-positive, non-spore-forming bacterial strain, designated GP-T3-3, was isolated from sediment sampled at a tidal flat in Gopado, Republic of Korea. Cells were aerobic, catalase-negative, oxidase-positive, non-motile cocci that occurred singly, in pairs or in clusters. Strain GP-T3-3 grew at 4–45 °C (optimum, 28–37 °C), at pH 4.0–12.0 (pH 8.0–9.0) and in the presence of 0–15 % (w/v) NaCl (3–5 %). Colonies of strain GP-T3-3 were deep-yellow, circular, smooth and pulvinate. The results of the phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain GP-T3-3 was closely related to Serinicoccus profundi MCCC 1A05965 (99.1 %), Serinicoccus chungangensis CAU 9536 (99.0 %) and Serinicoccus marinus JC1078 (98.0 %). The diagnostic diamino acid in the cell-wall peptidoglycan was meso-diaminopimelic acid. The predominant respiratory quinone was MK-8(H4) and the major fatty acids were anteiso-C17 : 0, iso-C16 : 0, iso-C15 : 0 and anteiso-C15 : 0. The polar lipid profile consisted of diphosphadidylglycerol, phosphadidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylinositol and two unidentified phospholipids. The DNA G+C content was 72.9 mol%. DNA–DNA relatedness values between strain GP-T3-3 and type strains of the genus Serinicoccus ranged from 28.9 to 50.5 %. On the basis of the phenotypic differences and DNA–DNA relatedness data, the isolate represents a new species of the genus Serinicoccus , for which the name Serinicoccus sediminis sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is GP-T3-3 (=KCTC 49173=JCM 32825=KCCM 43309=KACC 19850).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003415
2019-05-03
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/7/1998.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003415&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Yi H, Schumann P, Sohn K, Chun J. Serinicoccus marinus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel actinomycete with L-ornithine and L-serine in the peptidoglycan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:1585–1589 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Xiao J, Luo Y, Xie S, Xu J. Serinicoccus profundi sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from deep-sea sediment, and emended description of the genus Serinicoccus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:16–19 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Traiwan J, Park MH, Kim W. Serinicoccus chungangensis sp. nov., isolated from tidal flat sediment, and emended description of the genus Serinicoccus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1299–1303 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee DW, Lee SD. Aeromicrobium ponti sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:987–991 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Lee DW, Park MY, Kim JJ, Kim BS. Pseudokineococcus basanitobsidens sp. nov., isolated from volcanic rock. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:3824–3828 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lane D. 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M. (editors) Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons; 1991 pp. 115–175
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:4876–4882 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), Version 3.6a Seattle: Department of genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; 2002
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Collins MD, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE, Alderson G. Menaquinone composition of mycolic acid-containing actinomycetes and some sporoactinomycetes. J Appl Bacteriol 1985; 58:77–86 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Kroppenstedt R. Fatty acid and menaquinone analysis of actinomycetes and related organisms. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. (editors) Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp. 173–199
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards. Microbiol Today 2006; 33:152–155
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hirayama H, Tamaoka J, Horikoshi K. Improved immobilization of DNA to microwell plates for DNA-DNA hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res 1996; 24:4098–4099 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003415
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003415
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary data

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed