Alteromonas indica Lin et al. 2018 is a later heterotypic synonym of Salinimonas sediminis Cao et al. 2018 Free

Abstract

Alteromonas indica IO390401 was compared with Salinimonas sediminis N102 to examine the taxonomic relationship between the two type strains. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of A. indica IO390401 shared high similarity (99.9 %) with that of S. sediminis N102. The results of phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that the two strains formed a tight cluster within the genus Salinimonas . Whole genomic comparison between the two strains revealed an average nucleotide identity of 99.2 % and a digital DNA–DNA hybridization estimate of 92.6 %, strongly indicating that the two strains represented a single species. In addition, neither strain displayed any striking difference in metabolic, physiological or chemotaxonomic features. Therefore, we propose Alteromonas indica as a later heterotypic synonym of Salinimonas sediminis .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003329
2019-03-07
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/5/1423.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003329&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Jeon CO, Lim JM, Park DJ, Kim CJ. Salinimonas chungwhensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium from a solar saltern in Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:239–243 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Lee SY. Salinimonas lutimaris sp. nov., a polysaccharide-degrading bacterium isolated from a tidal flat. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2012; 101:803–810 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao J, Lai Q, Liu P, Wei Y, Wang L et al. Salinimonas sediminis sp. nov., a piezophilic bacterium isolated from a deep-sea sediment sample from the New Britain Trench. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3766–3771 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lin D, Chen Y, Zhu S, Yang J, Chen J. Alteromonas indica sp. nov., isolated from surface seawater from the Indian Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:3881–3885 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:142–148 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003329
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003329
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed