1887

Abstract

Members of the genus are mostly found in fermented plant material. Among the species, two species, and , were isolated from foods fermented from marine animals. The two species showed a high level of 16S rRNA gene similarity (99.39 %), whereas they exhibited a moderate level of DNA–DNA hybridization relatedness (63.9 %) in an earlier study. In this study, we determined the whole genome sequence of KCTC 3751 and compared it to those of FOL01 and other related species. The average nucleotide identity value between the type strains of and was 96.4 %, which is clearly higher than the cut-off proposed for bacterial species. We, therefore, propose to reclassify as a later heterotypic synonym of .

  • This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003315
2019-12-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/12/3672.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003315&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Fusco V, Quero GM, Cho GS, Kabisch J, Meske D et al. The genus Weissella: taxonomy, ecology and biotechnological potential. Front Microbiol 2015; 6:155 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Collins MD, Samelis J, Metaxopoulos J, Wallbanks S. Taxonomic studies on some leuconostoc-like organisms from fermented sausages: description of a new genus Weissella for the Leuconostoc paramesenteroides group of species. J Appl Bacteriol 1993; 75:595–603 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee SH, Ku HJ, Ahn MJ, Hong JS, Lee SH et al. Weissella jogaejeotgali sp. nov., isolated from jogae jeotgal, a traditional Korean fermented seafood. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4674–4681 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lee I, Chalita M, Ha SM, Na SI, Yoon SH et al. ContEst16S: an algorithm that identifies contaminated prokaryotic genomes using 16S RNA gene sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2053–2057 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 2015; 25:1043–1055 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M et al. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011; 28:2731–2739 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha SM, Baek I et al. UBCG: Up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:280–285 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Miller LT. Single derivatization method for routine analysis of bacterial whole-cell fatty acid methyl esters, including hydroxy acids. J Clin Microbiol 1982; 16:584–586[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang SJ, Kim BY, Chun J. Rejection of reclassification of Lactobacillus kimchii and Lactobacillus bobalius as later subjective synonyms of Lactobacillus paralimentarius using comparative genomics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:4515–4517 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tanasupawat S, Shida O, Okada S, Komagata K. Lactobacillus acidipiscis sp. nov. and Weissella thailandensis sp. nov., isolated from fermented fish in Thailand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1479–1485 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003315
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003315
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary data

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error