1887

Abstract

A strictly anaerobic, Gram-stain-positive, non motile and non-spore-forming rod-shaped bacterium, strain Marseille-P2666, was isolated using the culturomics approach from a vaginal sample of a French patient suffering from bacterial vaginosis. Cells were saccharolytic and were negative for catalase, oxidase, urease, nitrate reduction, indole production, hydrolysis of aesculin and gelatin. Strain Marseille-P2666 exhibited 97.04 % 16S rRNA sequence similarity to type strain YIT 12063, the phylogenetically closest species with standing in nomenclature. The major fatty acids were Cω9 (38 %), C (24 %) and C (19 %). The G+C content of the genome sequence of strain Marseille-P2666 is 64.6 mol%. On the basis of its phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic features, strain Marseille-P2666 (=CSUR 2666=DSM103342) was classified as type strain of a novel species within the genus for which the name sp. nov. is proposed.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Fondation Méditerranée Infection (Award None)
  • Fondation Méditerranée Infection (Award None)
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003221
2019-02-26
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/4/949.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003221&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I et al. Microbial culturomics: paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2012; 18:1185–1193 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lagier JC, Khelaifia S, Alou MT, Ndongo S, Dione N et al. Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1:16203 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Stackebrandt E, Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey NL. Proposal for a new hierarchic classification system, actinobacteria classis nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:479–491 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kageyama A, Benno Y, Nakase T. Phylogenetic and phenotypic evidence for the transfer of Eubacterium aerofaciens to the genus Collinsella as Collinsella aerofaciens gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:557–565 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kageyama A, Benno Y. Emendation of genus Collinsella and proposal of Collinsella stercoris sp. nov. and Collinsella intestinalis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1767–1774 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Nagai F, Watanabe Y, Morotomi M. Slackia piriformis sp. nov. and Collinsella tanakaei sp. nov., new members of the family Coriobacteriaceae, isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:2639–2646 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Padmanabhan R, Dubourg G, Nguyen TT, Couderc C, Rossi-Tamisier M et al. Non-contiguous finished genome sequence and description of Collinsella massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2014; 9:1144–1158 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Ramasamy D, Mishra AK, Lagier JC, Padhmanabhan R, Rossi M et al. A polyphasic strategy incorporating genomic data for the taxonomic description of novel bacterial species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:384–391 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pagani I, Liolios K, Jansson J, Chen IM, Smirnova T et al. The genomes online database (GOLD) v.4: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2012; 40:D571–D579 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sentausa E, Fournier PE. Advantages and limitations of genomics in prokaryotic taxonomy. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19:790–795 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Seng P, Drancourt M, Gouriet F, La Scola B et al. Ongoing revolution in bacteriology: routine identification of bacteria by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49:543–551 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Lagier JC, Hugon P, Khelaifia S, Fournier PE, La Scola B et al. The rebirth of culture in microbiology through the example of culturomics to study human gut microbiota. Clin Microbiol Rev 2015; 28:237–264 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carlioz A, Martelin R, Gayral JP et al. 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38:3623–3630[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk HP. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy?. Arch Microbiol 2013; 195:413–418 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Hahnke RL, Petersen J, Scheuner C, Michael V et al. Complete genome sequence of DSM 30083(T), the type strain (U5/41(T) of Escherichia coli, and a proposal for delineating subspecies in microbial taxonomy. Stand Genomic Sci 2014; 9:2 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:1312–1313 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Goloboff PA, Farris JS, Nixon KC. Tnt, a Free Program for Phylogenetic Analysis 2008 pp. 774–786
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Pattengale ND, Alipour M, Bininda-Emonds ORP, Moret BME, Stamatakis A et al. How many bootstrap replicates are necessary?. In Batzoglou S. (editor) Research in Computational Molecular Biology Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; pp. 184–200
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Swofford D L. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods) Version 4.0b10 Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2002
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stackebrandt E, Ebers J. Taxonomic parameters revisited: tarnished gold standards; 2006
  23. Konstantinidis KT, Ramette A, Tiedje JM. The bacterial species definition in the genomic era. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006; 361:1929–1940 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Diop A, Khelaifia S, Armstrong N, Labas N, Fournier P-E et al. Microbial culturomics unravels the halophilic microbiota repertoire of table salt: description of Gracilibacillus massiliensis sp. nov. Microb Ecol Health Dis 2016; 27: [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Citron DM, Ostovari MI, Karlsson A, Goldstein EJ. Evaluation of the E test for susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 1991; 29:2197–2203[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Matuschek E, Brown DF, Kahlmeter G. Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratories. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20:O255–O266 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids; 1990 http://natasha.eng.usf.edu/gilbert/courses/Biotransport%20Phenomena/pdf/bacteria_gc_1.pdf accessed 24 March 2016
  28. Dione N, Sankar SA, Lagier JC, Khelaifia S, Michele C et al. Genome sequence and description of Anaerosalibacter massiliensis sp. nov. New Microbes New Infect 2016; 10:66–76 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wilkins TD, Chalgren S. Medium for use in antibiotic susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1976; 10:926–928 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kageyama A, Benno Y. Collinsella. In Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria American Cancer Society; pp. 1–6
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Konstantinidis KT, Tiedje JM. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 2005; 187:6258–6264 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Rodriguez-R LM, Konstantinidis KT. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe Magazine 2014; 9:111–118 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Klenk HP, Göker M. Taxonomic use of DNA G+C content and DNA-DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:352–356 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003221
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003221
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error