1887

Abstract

An endophytic actinobacterium, designated strain KE2-3, was isolated from surface-sterilised rhizome of Kaempferia elegans. The polyphasic approach was used for evaluating the taxonomic position of this strain. The taxonomic affiliation of this strain at genus level could be confirmed by its chemotaxonomic characteristic, i.e. the presence of ll-diaminopimelic acid in the cell peptidoglycan, MK-9(H4) as the major menaquinone, iso-C16 : 0, anteiso-C15 : 0, iso-C14 : 0 and iso-C15 : 0 as the predominant fatty acids in cells, and the presence of diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol mannoside in its membranes. Based on 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, strain KE2-3 was identified as a member of the genus Jiangella and showed the highest similarities to Jiangella muralis DSM 45357 (99.3 %) followed by Jiangella alba DSM 45237 (99.2 %), Jiangella alkaliphilia DSM 45079 (99.0 %), Jiangella gansuensis DSM 44835 (98.8 %) and Jiangella mangrovi 3SM4-07 (98.6 %). However, the draft genome sequence of strain KE2-3 exhibited low average nucleotide identity values to the reference strains (85.5–90.2 %), which were well below the 95–96 % species circumscription threshold. The DNA G+C content of genomic DNA was 72.3 mol%. With the differences of physiological, biochemical and genotypic data, strain KE2-3 could be discriminated from its closest neighbour. Thus, strain KE2-3 should be recognised as a novel species of genus Jiangella , for which the name Jiangella endophytica sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is KE2-3 (=BCC 66359=NBRC 110004).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003175
2018-12-17
2021-10-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/69/2/454.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003175&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Song L, Li WJ, Wang QL, Chen GZ, Zhang YS et al. Jiangella gansuensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel actinomycete from a desert soil in north-west China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:881–884 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lee SD. Jiangella alkaliphila sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from a cave. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1176–1179 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Qin S, Zhao GZ, Li J, Zhu WY, Xu LH et al. Jiangella alba sp. nov., an endophytic actinomycete isolated from the stem of Maytenus austroyunnanensis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2162–2165 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Kämpfer P, Schäfer J, Lodders N, Martin K. Jiangella muralis sp. nov., from an indoor environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:128–131 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Suksaard P, Duangmal K, Srivibool R, Xie Q, Hong K et al. Jiangella mangrovi sp. nov., isolated from mangrove soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2569–2573 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Waksman SA. The Actinomycetes, CLassification, Identification and Description of Genera and Species vol. 2 Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1961
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kelly KL. Inter-Society Color Council — National Bureau of Standard Color Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1964
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Arai T. Culture Media for Actinomycetes Tokyo: The Society for Actinomycetes Japan; 1975
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Williams ST, Cross T. Actinomycetes. In Booth C. (editor) Methods in Microbiology vol. 4 London: Academic Press; 1971 pp. 295–334
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gordon RE, Barnett DA, Handerhan JE, Pang CH-N. Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the Nocardin Strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1974; 24:54–63 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hasegawa T, Takizawa M, Tanida S. A rapid analysis for chemical grouping of aerobic actinomycetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983; 29:319–322 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Komagata K, Suzuki KI. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987; 19:161–207
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins MD, Jones D. Lipids in the classification and identification of coryneform bacteria containing peptidoglycans based on 2, 4-diaminobutyric acid. J Appl Bacteriol 1980; 48:459–470 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tamaoka J. Analysis of bacterial menaquinone mixtures by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Methods Enzymol 1986; 123:31–36[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark: Microbial ID, Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kämpfer P, Kroppenstedt RM. Numerical analysis of fatty acid patterns of coryneform bacteria and related taxa. Can J Microbiol 1996; 42:989–1005 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tamaoka J. Determination of DNA Base Composition. In Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG. (editors) Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994 pp. 463–470
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Thawai C. Micromonospora costi sp. nov., isolated from a leaf of Costus speciosus. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1456–1461 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tamaoka J, Komagata K. Determination of DNA base composition by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1984; 25:125–128 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971; 20:406–416 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 2012; 19:455–477 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2068–2069 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60–73 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Weber T, Blin K, Duddela S, Krug D, Kim HU et al. AntiSMASH 3.0-a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43:W237–W243 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Xu B, Jin Z, Jin Q, Li N, Cen P. Improvement of pristinamycin production by genome shuffling and medium optimization for Streptomyces pristinaespiralis. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 2009; 14:175–179 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Sezonov G, Blanc V, Bamas-Jacques N, Friedmann A, Pernodet JL et al. Complete conversion of antibiotic precursor to pristinamycin IIA by overexpression of Streptomyces pristinaespiralis biosynthetic genes. Nat Biotechnol 1997; 15:349–353 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003175
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.003175
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error