1887

Abstract

A Gram-positive bacterium, designated CMU-AB225, was isolated from rhizosphere soil of an oil palm (Elaeis guineensis). The strain exhibited a blue aerial spore mass and a light cream to moderate yellow substrate mycelium and formed chains of spiny spores. Whole-cell hydrolysates consisted of ll-diaminopimelic acid, glucose, ribose, mannose and galactose. The predominant menaquinones were MK-9(H6), MK-9(H8) and MK-9(H4). The polar lipids profile contained diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositol-mannoside, four unidentified lipids, two unidentified aminolipids and an unidentified glycolipid. The major cellular fatty acids (>10 %) were iso-C16 : 0, C16 : 0, anteiso-C15 : 0 and iso-C15 : 0. The G+C content of genomic DNA was 69.7 mol%. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain CMU-AB225 was a member of the genus Streptomyces and formed a distinct phyletic line which was most closely related to Streptomyces koyangensis JCM 14915, Streptomyces misionensis JCM 4497 and Streptomyces aurantiogriseus JCM 4346. Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) using five housekeeping genes (atpD, gyrB, recA, rpoB and trpB) showed that the MLSA distances of strain CMU-AB225 to phylogenetically related species were greater than the 0.007 threshold. Moreover, the low values of DNA–DNA relatedness and phenotypic differences, especially a blue aerial mycelium, enabled strain CMU-AB225 to be distinguished from its closely related species. It is thus proposed that strain CMU-AB225 represents a novel species, namely Streptomyces venetus sp. nov. The type strain is CMU-AB225 (=JCM 31290=TBRC 2001).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002995
2018-08-31
2024-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/10/3333.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002995&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 1943; 46:337–341[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kämpfer P. Genus I. Streptomyces Waksman and Henrici 1943, 339AL emend. Witt and Stackebrandt 1990, 370 emend. Wellington, Stackebrandt, Sanders, Wolstrup and Jorgensen 1992, 159. In Goodfellow M, Kämpfer P, Busse HJ, Trujillo ME, Suzuki KI et al. (editors) Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume 5: The Actinobacteria New York: Springer; 2012 pp. 1455–1767
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier H. Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1970; 20:435–443 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bérdy J. Bioactive microbial metabolites. J Antibiot 2005; 58:1–26 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Watve MG, Tickoo R, Jog MM, Bhole BD. How many antibiotics are produced by the genus Streptomyces?. Arch Microbiol 2001; 176:386–390 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Seong CN, Choi JH, Baik KS. An improved selective isolation of rare actinomycetes from forest soil. J Microbiol 2001; 39:17–23
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kuester E, Williams ST. Selection of media for isolation of streptomycetes. Nature 1964; 202:928–929 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966; 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Murray RGE, Doetsch RN, Robinow CF. Determination and cytological light microscopy. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp. 32–34
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Jacobson E, Grauville WC, Fogs CE. Color Harmony Manual, 4th ed. Chicago: Container Corporation of America; 1958
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sujarit K, Sujada N, Kudo T, Ohkuma M, Pathom-Aree W et al. Pseudonocardia thailandensis sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from a subterranean termite nest. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:2773–2778 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990; 215:403–410 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:1792–1797 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M, Spröer C, Klenk HP. When should a DDH experiment be mandatory in microbial taxonomy?. Arch Microbiol 2013; 195:413–418 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst Zool 1969; 18:1–32 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980; 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Guo Y, Zheng W, Rong X, Huang Y. A multilocus phylogeny of the Streptomyces griseus 16S rRNA gene clade: use of multilocus sequence analysis for streptomycete systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:149–159 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In Bryson V, Vogel HJ. (editors) Evolving Genes and Proteins New York: Academic Press; 1965 pp. 97–166
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Raeder U, Broda P. Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Lett Appl Microbiol 1985; 1:17–20 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tamaoka J, Komagata K. Determination of DNA base composition by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1984; 25:125–128 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 1974; 28:226–231[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Mikami H, Ishida Y. Post-column fluorometric detection of reducing sugars in high performance liquid chromatography using arginine. Bunseki kagaku 1983; 32:E207E210 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Tamaoka J. Analysis of bacterial menaquinone mixtures by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Methods Enzymol 1986; 123:251–256[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp. 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Rong X, Huang Y. Taxonomic evaluation of the Streptomyces hygroscopicus clade using multilocus sequence analysis and DNA-DNA hybridization, validating the MLSA scheme for systematics of the whole genus. Syst Appl Microbiol 2012; 35:7–18 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Kroppenstedt RM. Fatty acid and menaquinone analysis of actinomycetes and related organisms. In Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. (editors) Chemical Methods in Bacterial Systematics London: Academic Press; 1985 pp. 137–199
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kudo T, Seino A. Transfer of Streptosporangium indianense Gupta 1965 to the genus Streptomyces as Streptomyces indiaensis (Gupta 1965) comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:241–244 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002995
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002995
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error