1887

Abstract

The genomes of the type strains of Roseivivax atlanticus and Roseivivax marinus ( Rhodobacteraceae , Alphaproteobacteria ), were analysed to determine their respective Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) and in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH) values. These species were proposed and effectively published relatively closely in time (February and August 2014, respectively) and so not taking account of the other. The intergenomic relatedness between both type strains, 97.0–97.4 % ANI and 82.8 % in silico DDH, confirm that they represent members of the same genomic species. This conclusion is also supported at the phenotypic level. Since the name Roseovarius marinus was validly published earlier, R. atlanticus (Validation List 161, IJSEM 65, 1–4. 2015) should be considered a later heterotypic synonym of R. marinus (Dai, Shi, Gao, Liu and Zhang, 2014), in application of the priority rule.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002893
2018-06-22
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/8/2650.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002893&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Suzuki T, Muroga Y, Takahama M, Nishimura Y. Roseivivax halodurans gen. nov., sp. nov. and Roseivivax halotolerans sp. nov., aerobic bacteriochlorophyll-containing bacteria isolated from a saline lake. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1999; 49:629–634 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Li G, Lai Q, Liu X, Sun F, Shao Z. Roseivivax atlanticus sp. nov., isolated from surface seawater of the Atlantic Ocean. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 105:863–869 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen MH, Sheu SY, Chen CA, Wang JT, Chen WM. Roseivivax isoporae sp. nov., isolated from a reef-building coral, and emended description of the genus Roseivivax. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1259–1264 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Jung YT, Lee JS, Yoon JH. Roseivivax jejudonensis sp. nov., isolated from the junction between the ocean and a freshwater spring at Jeju Island, South Korea. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014; 106:959–967 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Park S, Kang SJ, Oh TK, Yoon JH. Roseivivax lentus sp. nov., isolated from a tidal flat sediment, and emended description of the genus Roseivivax Suzuki et al. 1999. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2010; 60:1113–1117 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dai X, Shi X, Gao X, Liu J, Zhang XH. Roseivivax marinus sp. nov., isolated from deep water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2540–2544 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Wu YH, Meng FX, Xu L, Zhang XQ, Wang CS et al. Roseivivax pacificus sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4574–4579 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang YQ, Lee JC, Park DJ, Lu XX, Mou XZ et al. Roseivivax roseus sp. nov., an alphaproteobacterium isolated from a solar saltern soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1743–1746 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Xiao W, Wang YX, Liu JH, Wang ZG, Zhang XX et al. Roseivivax sediminis sp. nov., a moderately halophilic bacterium isolated from salt mine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:1890–1895 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation List no. 161. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1–4 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Na SI, Kim YO, Yoon SH, Ha SM, Baek I et al. UBCG: up-to-date bacterial core gene set and pipeline for phylogenomic tree reconstruction. J Microbiol 2018; 56:281–285 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Oliver Glöckner F, Peplies J. JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 2016; 32:929–931 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Auch AF, Klenk HP, Göker M. Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 2013; 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Chun J, Oren A, Ventosa A, Christensen H, Arahal DR et al. Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:461–466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation List no. 163. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:1105–1111 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002893
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002893
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error