1887

Abstract

A novel actinobacterium, designated TRM46399, was isolated from ditch sediment in Xinjiang Province, Northwest China. Phylogenetic, physiological, chemotaxonomic and morphological analyses demonstrated that strain TRM46399 belonged to the genus . The strain was aerobic, Gram-stain-positive, had aerial mycelia that branched monopodially and formed chains of arthrospores. The spores were oval to cylindrical with smooth surfaces. The strain had an optimum NaCl concentration for growth of 5 % (w/v). The whole-cell sugar pattern of TRM46399 consisted of ribose, xylose, mannose and galactose. The predominant menaquinones were MK-9(H), MK-9(H) and MK-9(H). The polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol mannosides. Major fatty acids were iso-C (47.8 %), iso-C (13.5 %), C (8.9 %), anteiso-C (8.4 %), anteiso-C (4.2 %) and Ccyclo (2.7 %). The G+C content of the genomic DNA was 68.7 mol%. Comparative 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that strain TRM46399 (KY688182) was phylogenetically most closely related to S187 (99.13 % sequence similarity); however, DNA–DNA hybridization studies between stain TRM46399 and S187 showed only 65.32 % relatedness. Based on the evidence from this polyphasic study, strain TRM46399 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is TRM46399 (=KCTC 39610 =CCTCC AA 2015009).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002804
2018-07-01
2020-04-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/7/2178.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002804&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Euzéby JP. List of bacterial names with standing in nomenclature: a folder available on the Internet. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997;47:590–592 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Waksman SA, Henrici AT. The nomenclature and classification of the Actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 1943;46:337–341[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Williams ST, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Wellington EM, Sneath PH et al. Numerical classification of Streptomyces and related genera. J Gen Microbiol 1983;129:1743–1813 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Manfio GP, Zakrzewska-Czerwinska J, Atalan E, Goodfellow M. Towards minimal standards for the description of Streptomyces species. Bio Technologiia 1995;8:228–237
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier H. Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1970;20:435–443 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Katz L, Baltz RH. Natural product discovery: past, present, and future. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2016;43:155–176 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Goodfellow M, Fiedler HP. A guide to successful bioprospecting: informed by actinobacterial systematics. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2010;98:119–142 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Veyisoglu A, Sahin N. Streptomyces hoynatensis sp. nov., isolated from deep marine sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:819–826 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodfellow M, Busarakam K, Idris H, Labeda DP, Nouioui I et al. Streptomyces asenjonii sp. nov., isolated from hyper-arid Atacama Desert soils and emended description of Streptomyces viridosporus Pridham et al. 1958. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2017;110:1133–1148 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1966;16:313–340 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim SB, Lonsdale J, Seong CN, Goodfellow M. Streptacidiphilus gen. nov., acidophilic actinomycetes with wall chemotype I and emendation of the family Streptomycetaceae (Waksman and Henrici (1943)AL) emend. Rainey, et al. 1997. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2003;3:107–116
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Pridham TG, Gottlieb D. The utilization of carbon compounds by some Actinomycetales as an aid for species determination. J Bacteriol 1948;56:107–114[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hasegawa T, Takizawa M, Tanida S. A rapid analysis for chemical grouping of aerobic actinomycetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1983;29:319–322 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Shah HN, Collins MD. Fatty acid and isoprenoid quinone composition in the classification of Bacteroides melaninogenicus and related taxa. J Appl Bacteriol 1980;48:75–87 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977;100:221–230 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984;2:233–241 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989;39:159–167 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012;62:716–721 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013;30:2725–2729 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4:406–425 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981;17:368–376 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Mount DW. Maximum parsimony method for phylogenetic prediction. CSH Protoc 2008;2008:pdb.top32 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980;16:111–120 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Gouy M, Guindon S, Gascuel O. SeaView version 4: A multiplatform graphical user interface for sequence alignment and phylogenetic tree building. Mol Biol Evol 2010;27:221–224 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 2011;27:1164–1165 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Felsenstein J. Estimating effective population size from samples of sequences: a bootstrap Monte Carlo integration method. Genet Res 1992;60:209–220 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:19126–19131 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:346–351 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002804
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002804
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited this month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error