1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, aerobic bacterium, strain M5, was isolated from a seawater sample collected from the western Pacific Ocean at a depth of 1000 m and characterized by using polyphasic taxonomy. Cells of the strain were rod-shaped and motile by a single polar flagellum. Cells grew at 4–40 °C (optimum, 25 °C), at pH 7–10 (optimum, 9) and with 0–10 % NaCl (optimum, 1–2 %). Phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain M5 was associated with the genus , and showed highest similarities to CL-AP6 (97.8 %) and XCD-X85 (97.5 %) and J64 (96.4 %). The average nucleotide identity scores for strains CL-AP6 and XCD-X85 were 74.6 % and 73.7 %, the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator scores were 15.8–19.5 % and 15.4–19.7 %, and the species identification scores were 92.3 % and 92.4 %. The major isoprenoid quinone of strain M5 was ubiquinone (Q-9) and the major cellular fatty acids were summed feature 8 (Cω7 and/or Cω6; 33.2 %), summed feature 3 (Cω7 and/or Cω6; 22.8 %) and C (13 %). The major polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, phospholipid and some unidentified lipids. The phylogenetic analysis and physiological and biochemical data showed that strain M5 should be classified as representing a novel species in the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is M5 (=CCTCC AB 2017186=KCTC 62119=CICC 24308).

Keyword(s): deep sea , genome and Pseudomonas
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002748
2018-05-01
2024-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/68/5/1776.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002748&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Migula W. Über ein neues System der Bakterien. Arb Bakteriol Inst Karlsruhe 1894; 1:235–238
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Palleroni NJ. Genus I. Pseudomonas Migula 1894, 237AL . In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM. (editors) Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol. 2 partB New York: Springer; 2005 pp. 323–379
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gupta SK, Kumari R, Prakash O, Lal R. Pseudomonas panipatensis sp. nov., isolated from an oil-contaminated site. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1339–1345 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Palleroni NJ. Genus I. Pseudomonas Migula 1894, 237AL . In Krieg NR, Holt JG. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol. 1 Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1984 pp. 141–199
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Mulet M, Lalucat J, García-Valdés E. DNA sequence-based analysis of the Pseudomonas species. Environ Microbiol 2010; 12:1513–1530 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rzhetsky A, Nei M. A simple method for estimating and testing minimum evolution trees. Mol Biol Evol 1992; 9:945–967
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Liu M, Luo X, Zhang L, Dai J, Wang Y et al. Pseudomonas xinjiangensis sp. nov., a moderately thermotolerant bacterium isolated from desert sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:1286–1289 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim KH, Roh SW, Chang HW, Nam YD, Yoon JH et al. Pseudomonas sabulinigri sp. nov., isolated from black beach sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:38–41 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhong ZP, Liu Y, Hou TT, Liu HC, Zhou YG et al. Pseudomonas salina sp. nov., isolated from a salt lake. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2846–2851 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hwang CY, Zhang GI, Kang SH, Kim HJ, Cho BC. Pseudomonas pelagia sp. nov., isolated from a culture of the Antarctic green alga Pyramimonas gelidicola . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:3019–3024 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Pascual J, Lucena T, Ruvira MA, Giordano A, Gambacorta A et al. Pseudomonas litoralis sp. nov., isolated from Mediterranean seawater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:438–444 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang DC, Liu HC, Zhou YG, Schinner F, Margesin R. Pseudomonas bauzanensis sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2333–2337 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2017; 110:1281–1286 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Auch AF, von Jan M, Klenk HP, Göker M. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2010; 2:117–134 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Zeller G, Bork P. Accurate and universal delineation of prokaryotic species. Nat Methods 2013; 10:881–884 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kim M, Oh HS, Park SC, Chun J. Towards a taxonomic coherence between average nucleotide identity and 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity for species demarcation of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:346–351 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Breznak JA, Costilow RN. Physicochemical factors in growth. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 309–329
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1994 pp. 607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Høvik Hansen G, Sørheim R. Improved method for phenotypical characterization of marine bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 1991; 13:231–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kämpfer P, Kroppenstedt RM. Numerical analysis of fatty acid patterns of coryneform bacteria and related taxa. Can J Microbiol 1996; 42:989–1005 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Collins MD. Analysis of isoprenoid quinones. Methods Microbiol 1985; 18:329–366 [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kates M. Techniques of Lipidology Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1986
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002748
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002748
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error