sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater stream Free

Abstract

Strain KYPY9, isolated from the Funglin Stream in Taiwan, was characterized using a polyphasic taxonomy approach. Cells of KYPY9 were Gram-staining-negative, strictly aerobic, motile by means of a single polar flagellum, rod-shaped and formed light yellow colonies. Optimal growth occurred at 20–25 °C, at pH 7 and with 0 % NaCl. The results of phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that KYPY9 represented a member of the genus and the sequence similarity between the 16S rRNA genes of KYPY9 and of the type strains of other species of the genus ranged from 94.1 to 98.0 %. The closest relatives of KYPY9 were SHS5-24 (98.0 %) and CMJ-9 (97.0 %). KYPY9 had summed feature 3 (Cω7 and/or Cω6) and C as the predominant fatty acids. The major cellular hydroxy fatty acid was C 3-OH. KYPY9 had phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol and diphosphatidylglycerol as the predominant polar lipids. The polyamine profile was composed of the major compound 2-hydroxyputrescine and moderate amounts of putrescine. The major respiratory quinone was Q-8 and the DNA G+C content was 47.4 mol%. The DNA–DNA relatedness of KYPY9 with respect to SHS5-24 and CMJ-9 was less than 35 %. On the basis of the phylogenetic inference and phenotypic data, KYPY9 was recognized as a representative of a novel species within the genus . The name sp. nov. is proposed, with KYPY9 (=BCRC 81009=LMG 29730=KCTC 52442) as the type strain.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002422
2017-12-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/12/5094.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002422&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kämpfer P, Rosselló-Mora R, Hermansson M, Persson F, Huber B et al. Undibacterium pigrum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from drinking water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1510–1515 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Garrity GM, Bell JA, Lilburn T. Family II. Oxalobacteraceae fam. nov. In Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM. (editors) Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd ed. vol. 2 The Proteobacteria, part C Heidelberg & New York: Springer; 2005 pp. 623
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Eder W, Wanner G, Ludwig W, Busse HJ, Ziemke-Kägeler F et al. Description of Undibacterium oligocarboniphilum sp. nov., isolated from purified water, and Undibacterium pigrum strain CCUG 49012 as the type strain of Undibacterium parvum sp. nov., and emended descriptions of the genus Undibacterium and the species Undibacterium pigrum . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:384–391 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu YQ, Wang BJ, Zhou N, Liu SJ. Undibacterium terreum sp. nov., isolated from permafrost soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2296–2300 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim SJ, Moon JY, Weon HY, Hong SB, Seok SJ et al. Undibacterium jejuense sp. nov. and Undibacterium seohonense sp. nov., isolated from soil and freshwater, respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:236–241 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Sheu SY, Lin YS, Chen JC, Chen WM. Undibacterium macrobrachii sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater shrimp culture pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:1036–1042 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Sheu SY, Lin YS, Chen JC, Kwon SW, Chen WM. Undibacterium squillarum sp. nov., isolated from a freshwater shrimp culture pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3459–3466 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Du J, Akter S, Won K, Singh H, Shik Yin C et al. Undibacterium aquatile sp. nov., isolated from a waterfall. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:4128–4133 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Li X, Chang X, Zhang Y, Liu Z, da X et al. Undibacterium arcticum sp. nov., isolated from arctic alpine soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2797–2802 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kämpfer P, Irgang R, Busse HJ, Poblete-Morales M, Kleinhagauer T et al. Undibacterium danionis sp. nov. isolated from a zebrafish (Danio rerio). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:3625–3631 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Anzai Y, Kudo Y, Oyaizu H. The phylogeny of the genera Chryseomonas, Flavimonas,and Pseudomonas supports synonymy of these three genera. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:249–251 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chen WM, Laevens S, Lee TM, Coenye T, de Vos P et al. Ralstonia taiwanensis sp. nov., isolated from root nodules of Mimosa species and sputum of a cystic fibrosis patient. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1729–1735 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Yoon SH, Ha SM, Kwon S, Lim J, Kim Y et al. Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2017; 67:1613–1617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B et al. The ribosomal database project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:D141–D145 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1983 [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst Zool 1969; 18:1–32 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Felsenstein J. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.5c. Distributed by the author. Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA; 1993
  24. Powers EM. Efficacy of the Ryu nonstaining KOH technique for rapidly determining Gram reactions of food-borne and waterborne bacteria and yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol 1995; 61:3756–3758[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Beveridge TJ, Lawrence JR, Murray RGE. Sampling and staining for light microscopy. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 19–33
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Breznak JA, Costilow RN. Physicochemical factors in growth. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 309–329
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tindall BJ, Sikorski J, Smibert RA, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization and the principles of comparative systematics. In Beveridge TJ, Breznak JA, Marzluf GA, Schmidt TM, Snyder LR et al. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 2007 pp. 330–393
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wen CM, Tseng CS, Cheng CY, Li YK. Purification, characterization and cloning of a chitinase from Bacillus sp. NCTU2. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 2002; 35:213–219 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Bowman JP. Description of Cellulophaga algicola sp. nov., isolated from the surfaces of Antarctic algae, and reclassification of Cytophaga uliginosa (ZoBell and Upham 1944) Reichenbach 1989 as Cellulophaga uliginosa comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:1861–1868 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Nokhal T-H, Schlegel HG. Taxonomic study of Paracoccus denitrificans . Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983; 33:26–37 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid–deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wayne LG, Moore WEC, Stackebrandt E, Kandler O, Colwell RR et al. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1987; 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Embley TM, Wait R. Structural lipids of eubacteria. In Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG. (editors) Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1994 pp. 121–161
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Busse J, Auling G. Polyamine pattern as a chemotaxonomic marker within the Proteobacteria . Syst Appl Microbiol 1988; 11:1–8 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Busse H-J, Bunka S, Hensel A, Lubitz W. Discrimination of members of the family Pasteurellaceae based on polyamine patterns. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1997; 47:698–708 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Collins MD. Isoprenoid quinones. In Goodfellow M, O’Donnell AG. (editors) Chemical Methods in Prokaryotic Systematics Chichester: Wiley; 1994 pp. 265–309
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002422
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002422
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed