1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain positive, aerobic, non-motile, rod-shaped bacterium (THG-T1.18) was isolated from desert soil. Growth occurred at 20–35 °C (optimum 28–30 °C), at pH 5–7 (optimum 7) and at 0–4 % NaCl (optimum 0–1 %). Based on 16S rRNA sequence analysis, the nearest phylogenetic neighbours of strain THG-T1.18 were identified as DSM 23442 (96.6 %), JCM 16573 (96.3 %) and KACC 17219 (96.1 %). The polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylglycerol, two unidentified aminolipids and one unidentified glycolipid. The quinone system was composed of MK-7, MK-8 and MK-6. The major fatty acids were C and C. The type of peptidoglycan was A4, containing of -Orn–D-Glu. The DNA G+C content of strain THG-T1.18 was 50.4 mol%. DNA–DNA hybridization values between strain THG-T1.18 and DSM 23442, JCM 16573, KACC 17219 were 24.7 % (20.1 % reciprocal analysis), 19.5 % (16.1 %) and 10.4 % (6.7 %) respectively. On the basis of the phylogenetic analysis, chemotaxonomic data, physiological characteristics and DNA–DNA hybridization data, strain THG-T1.18 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is THG-T1.18 (=KACC 18929=CCTCC AB 2016179).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002264
2017-10-01
2024-04-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/10/4126.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002264&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Arora PK, Chauhan A, Pant B, Korpole S, Mayilraj S et al. Chryseomicrobium imtechense gen. nov., sp. nov., a new member of the family Planococcaceae . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1859–1864 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Raj PS, Sasikala C, Ramaprasad EV, Subhash Y, Busse HJ et al. Chryseomicrobium amylolyticum sp. nov., isolated from a semi-arid tropical soil, and emended descriptions of the genus Chryseomicrobium and Chryseomicrobium imtechense. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2612–2617 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Deng SK, Ye XM, Chu CW, Jiang J, He J et al. Chryseomicrobium aureum sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from activated sludge. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2682–2687 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991; 173:697–703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007; 23:2947–2948 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hall TA. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 1999; 41:95–98
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 1984
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987; 4:406–425[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 1981; 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kluge AG, Farris JS. Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst Biol 1969; 18:1–32 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013; 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985; 39:783–791 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Buck JD. Nonstaining (KOH) method for determination of gram reactions of marine bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1982; 44:992–993[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kovacs N. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature 1956; 178:703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Yan ZF, Lin P, Chu X, Kook M, Li CT et al. Aeromicrobium halotolerans sp. nov., isolated from desert soil sample. Arch Microbiol 2016; 198:423–427 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Yan ZF, Trinh H, Moya G, Lin P, Li CT et al. Lysobacter rhizophilus sp. nov., isolated from rhizosphere soil of mugunghwa, the national flower of South Korea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4754–4759 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Barrow G, Feltham RKA. Cowan and Steel's Manual for the Identification of Medical Bacteria United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2003
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:159–167 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ezaki T, Hashimoto Y, Yabuuchi E. Fluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid-deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization in microdilution wells as an alternative to membrane filter hybridization in which radioisotopes are used to determine genetic relatedness among bacterial strains. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989; 39:224–229 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Stabili L, Gravili C, Tredici SM, Piraino S, Talà A et al. Epibiotic Vibrio luminous bacteria isolated from some hydrozoa and bryozoa species. Microb Ecol 2008; 56:625–636 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987; 37:463–464 [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984; 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Collins MD, Jones D. Lipids in the classification and identification of coryneform bacteria containing peptidoglycans based on 2, 4-diaminobutyric acid. J Appl Bacteriol 1980; 48:459–470 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Newark, DE: MIDI Inc.; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Collins MD, Pirouz T, Goodfellow M, Minnikin DE. Distribution of menaquinones in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J Gen Microbiol 1977; 100:221–230 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Hu HY, Lim BR, Goto N, Fujie K. Analytical precision and repeatability of respiratory quinones for quantitative study of microbial community structure in environmental samples. J Microbiol Methods 2001; 47:17–24[PubMed] [Crossref]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kroppenstedt RM. Separation of bacterial menaquinones by HPLC using reverse phase (RP18) and a silver loaded ion exchanger as stationary phases. J Liq Chromatogr 1982; 5:2359–2367 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hu QW, Chu X, Xiao M, Li CT, Yan ZF et al. Arthrobacter deserti sp. nov., isolated from a desert soil sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:2035–2040 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002264
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.002264
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error