1887

Abstract

A Gram-stain-negative, aerobic, rod-shaped, non-motile and pale yellow-pigmented bacterial strain, designated as HY03, was isolated from mountain soil. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences indicated that strain HY03 belonged to the family Chitinophagaceae in the phylum Bacteroidetes and was most closely related to Flaviaesturariibacter amylovorans GCR0105 at a similarity of 95.4 %. The genomic DNA G+C content of strain HY03 was 43.2 mol%. The major fatty acids of the isolate were iso-C15 : 0, iso-C15 : 1 G and iso-C17 : 0 3-OH. The polar lipid profile of strain HY03 consisted of the major compound phosphatidylethanolamine and moderate amounts of an unknown aminophospholipid, unknown phospholipids and unknown lipids. The predominant respiratory quinone was menaquinone 7 (MK-7). Phylogenetic, genotypic, phenotypic and chemotaxonomic characteristics indicated that strain HY03 represents a novel species within the genus Flaviaesturariibacter , for which the name Flaviaesturariibacter terrae sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is HY03 (=KCTC 52511=JCM 31723).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001996
2017-08-15
2019-10-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/67/8/2660.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001996&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kang JY, Chun J, Seo JW, Kim CH, Jahng KY. Flaviaesturariibacter amylovorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a starch-hydrolysing bacterium, isolated from estuarine water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015;65:2209–2214 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 1991;173:697–703 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim OS, Cho YJ, Lee K, Yoon SH, Kim M et al. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012;62:716–721 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:4876–4882 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 2013;30:2725–2729 [CrossRef][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987;4:406–425[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Fitch WM. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 1971;20:406–416 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Felsenstein J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985;39:783–791 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Smibert RM, Krieg NR. Phenotypic characterization. In Gerhardt P, Murray RGE, Wood WA, Krieg NR. (editors) Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology; 1992; pp.607–654
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cappuccino JG, Sherman N. Microbiology: A Laboratory Manual, 9th ed. San Francisco, USA: Benjamin Cummings; 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wilson K. Preparation of genomic DNA from bacteria. In Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG et al. (editors) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc:; 1997; pp.2.4.1–2.4.2
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Mesbah M, Premachandran U, Whitman WB. Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989;39:159–167 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Sasser M. Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. Netwark, DE: MIDI Inc; 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Minnikin DE, O'Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 1984;2:233–241 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Komagata K, Suzuki KI. Lipid and cell-wall analysis in bacterial systematics. Methods Microbiol 1987;19:161–205[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hiraishi A, Ueda Y, Ishihara J, Mori T. Comparative lipoquinone analysis of influent sewage and activated sludge by high-performance liquid chromatography and photodiode array detection. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1996;42:457–469 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wayne LG, Brenner DJ, Colwell RR, Grimont PAD, Kandler O et al. International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1987;37:463–464[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Stackebrandt E, Goebel BM. Taxonomic note: a place for DNA-DNA reassociation and 16S rRNA sequence analysis in the present species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994;44:846–849 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001996
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001996
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error