1887

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY logo

Volume 66, Issue 11

sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium isolated from spoiled jelly Free

Abstract

A Gram-positive-staining, endospore-forming, facultatively anaerobic, lactic-acid-producing bacterium, strain GD201205, was isolated from spoiled jelly in China. Strain GD201205 fermented glucose, fructose, mannose, sucrose, raffinose and turanose, but negative for nitrate reduction, catalase and oxidase. The predominant fatty acids of the strain were anteiso-C and anteiso-C. Whole-cell hydrolysates contained glycine and alanine with -iaminopimelic acid as the diagnostic diamino acid. The major polar lipids were diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, glycolipid 1 and glycolipid 2. The DNA G+C content of strain GD201205 was 48.7 mol%. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that the strain belonged to the genus and was most closely related to KCTC 5376 and JCM 15325 with 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities of 97.5 and 96.9 %, respectively. Levels of DNA–DNA relatedness between strain GD201205 and KCTC 5376and JCM 15325 were 29.2 and 47.6 %, respectively. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene and gene revealed that strain GD201205 was clearly distinct from all related species of the genus . On the basis of the phylogenetic, chemotaxonomic and phenotypic evidence given in this study, strain GD201205 should be classified as a representative of a novel species of the genus for which the name is proposed. The type strain is GD201205 (=CICC 23867=KCTC 15488).

  • Received:
  • Accepted:
  • Published Online:
Keyword(s): 16S rRNA , Phylogenetic tree , spoiled jelly and Sporolactobacillus
© 2016 IUMS
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001351
2016-11-01
2024-04-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/66/11/4323.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001351&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Andersch I., Pianka S., Fritze D., Claus D. 1994; Description of Bacillus laevolacticus (ex Nakayama and Yanoshi 1967) sp. nov., nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:659–664 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Chang Y. H., Jung M. Y., Park I. S., Oh H. M. 2008; Sporolactobacillus vineae sp. nov., a spore-forming lactic acid bacterium isolated from vineyard soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2316–2320 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Collins M. D. 1985; Analysis of isoprenoid quinones. Methods Microbiol 18:329–363 [CrossRef]
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Fujita R., Mochida K., Kato Y., Goto K. 2010; Sporolactobacillus putidus sp. nov., an endospore-forming lactic acid bacterium isolated from spoiled orange juice. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:1499–1503 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Gillis M., De Ley J., De Cleene M. 1970; The determination of molecular weight of bacterial genome DNA from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 12:143–153 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Hatayama K., Shoun H., Ueda Y., Nakamura A. 2006; Tuberibacillus calidus gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a compost pile and reclassification of Bacillus naganoensis Tomimura et al. 1990 as Pullulanibacillus naganoensis gen. nov., comb. nov. and Bacillus laevolacticus Andersch et al. 1994 as Sporolactobacillus laevolacticus comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:2545–2551 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim O. S., Cho Y. J., Lee K., Yoon S. H., Kim M., Na H., Park S. C., Jeon Y. S., Lee J. H. et al. 2012; Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Kitahara K., Suzuki J. 1963; Sporolactobacillus nov. subgen. J Gen Appl Microbiol 9:59–71 [CrossRef]
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Lane D. J. 1991; 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics pp 115–175 Edited by Stackebrandt E., Goodfellow M. Chichester: Wiley;
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Marmur J. 1961; A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from micro-organisms. J Mol Biol 3:208–218 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Mesbah M., Premachandran U., Whitman W. B. 1989; Precise measurement of the G+C content of deoxyribonucleic acid by high-performance liquid chromatography. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39:159–167 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Nakayama O., Yanoshi M. 1967; Spore-bearing lactic acid bacteria isolated from rhizosphere. I. Taxonomic studies on Bacillus laevolacticus nov. sp. and Bacillus racemilacticus nov. Sp. J Gen Appl Microbiol 13:139–153 [CrossRef]
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Rhuland L. E., Work E., Denman R. F., Hoare D. S. 1955; The behavior of the isomers of α,ε-diaminopimelic acid on paper chromatograms. J Am Chem Soc 77:4844–4846 [View Article]
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987; The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Schleifer K. H., Kandler O. 1972; Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev 36:407–477[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Stackebrandt E., Frederiksen W., Garrity G. M., Grimont P. A., Kämpfer P., Maiden M. C., Nesme X., Rosselló-Mora R., Swings J. et al. 2002; Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1043–1050 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Staneck J. L., Roberts G. D. 1974; Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol 28:226–231[PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Tamura K., Peterson D., Peterson N., Stecher G., Nei M., Kumar S. 2011; mega5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Thamacharoensuk T., Kitahara M., Ohkuma M., Thongchul N., Tanasupawat S. 2015; Sporolactobacillus shoreae sp. nov. and Sporolactobacillus spathodeae sp. nov., two spore-forming lactic acid bacteria isolated from tree barks in Thailand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:1220–1226 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Yanagida F., Suzuki F. I, Kozaki F., Komagata F. 1997; Proposal of Sporolactobacillus nakayamae subsp. nakayamae sp. nov., subsp. nov., Sporolactobacillus nakayamae subsp. racemicus subsp. nov., Sporolactobacillus terrae sp. nov., Sporolactobacillus kofuensis sp. nov., and Sporolactobacillus lactosus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 47:499–504
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. 1994; clustal w: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680 [View Article][PubMed]
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001351
Loading
Sporolactobacillus pectinivorans sp. nov., an anaerobic bacterium isolated from spoiled jelly
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66, 4323 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001351
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001351
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.001351
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error