1887

Abstract

A novel actinomycete, designated strain NEAU-G9, was isolated from the root of (Mill.) collected from Harbin, Heilongjiang province, north China, and was characterized using a polyphasic approach. Key morphological and chemotaxonomic properties confirmed the affiliation of strain NEAU-G9 to the genus Strain NEAU-G9 contained -diaminopimelic acid as the diamino acid. The predominant menaquinones were MK-9(H), MK-9(H) and MK-9(H). The phospholipid profile contained diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol and phosphatidylinositol mannoside. The predominant fatty acids were iso-C, anteiso-C and C.16S rRNA gene sequence similarity studies showed that strain NEAU-G9 belongs to the genus and exhibits the highest sequence similarity to JCM 13275 (97.75 %). However, phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence indicated that strain NEAU-G9 is most closely related to JCM 4062 (97.12 % sequence similarity). A combination of DNA–DNA hybridization results and some phenotypic characteristics indicated that strain NEAU-G9 can be clearly distinguished from JCM 13275 and JCM 4062. Consequently, strain NEAU-G9 represents a novel species of the genus , for which the name sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is NEAU-G9 ( = CGMCC 4.7237 = DSM 100521).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000906
2016-03-01
2022-08-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/66/3/1488.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000906&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Collins M. D. 1985; Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. In Chemical methods in Bacterial Systematics pp 267–284Edited by Goodfellow M., Minnikin D. E. London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. De Ley J., Cattoir H., Reynaerts A. 1970; The quantitative measurement of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Eur J Biochem 12:133–142 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Felsenstein J. 1981; Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol 17:368–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Felsenstein J. 1985; Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gao R., Liu C., Zhao J., Jia F., Yu C., Yang L., Wang X., Xiang W. 2014; Micromonospora jinlongensis sp. nov., isolated from muddy soil in China and emended description of the genus Micromonospora . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 105:307–315 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gordon R. E., Barnett D. A., Handerhan J. E., Pang C.H.-N. 1974; Nocardia coeliaca, Nocardia autotrophica, and the nocardin strain. Int J Syst Bacteriol 24:54–63 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hayakawa M., Nonomura H. 1987; Humic acid-vitamin agar, a new medium for selective isolation of soil actinomycetes. J Ferment Technol 65:501–509 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Huss V. A. R., Festl H., Schleifer K. H. 1983; Studies on the spectrophotometric determination of DNA hybridization from renaturation rates. Syst Appl Microbiol 4:184–192 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kämpfer P., Labeda D. P. 2006; International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes; Subcommittee on the taxonomy of the Streptomycetaceae: Minutes of the meeting, 25 July 2005, San Francisco, CA, USA. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:495 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Kelly K. L. 1964 Inter-Society Color Council – National Bureau of Standards Color Name Charts Illustrated with Centroid Colors Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office;
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Kim S. B., Brown R., Oldfield C., Gilbert S. C., Iliarionov S., Goodfellow M. 2000; Gordonia amicalis sp. nov., a novel dibenzothiophene-desulphurizing actinomycete. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:2031–2036 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kim O. S., Cho Y. J., Lee K., Yoon S. H., Kim M., Na H., Park S. C., Jeon Y. S., Lee J. H., other authors. 2012; Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimura M. 1980; A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Labeda D. P., Goodfellow M., Brown R., Ward A. C., Lanoot B., Vanncanneyt M., Swings J., Kim S. B., Liu Z., other authors. 2012; Phylogenetic study of the species within the family Streptomycetaceae . Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 101:73–104 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lechevalier H. A., Lechevalier M. P. 1970a; A critical evaluation of the genera of aerobic actinomycetes. In The Actinomycetes pp 393–405Edited by Prauser H. Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer;
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Lechevalier M. P., Lechevalier H. A. 1970b; Chemical composition as a criterion in the classification of aerobic actinomycetes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 20:435–443 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lechevalier M. P., Lechevalier H. A. 1980; The chemotaxonomy of actinomycetes. In Actinomycete Taxonomy (Special Publication no. 6) pp 227–291Edited by Dietz A., Thayer J. Arlington, VA: Society of Industrial Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Lechevalier M. P., De Bièvre C., Lechevalier H. A. 1977; Chemotaxonomy of aerobic actinomycetes: phospholipid composition. Biochem Syst Ecol 5:249–260 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Lodders N., Kämpfer P. 2007; Sreptomycetaceae: Phylogeny, Ecology and Pathogenicity. eLS.
  20. Mandel M., Marmur J. 1968; Use of ultraviolet absorbance-temperature profile for determining the guanine plus cytosine content of DNA. Methods Enzymol 12B:195–206 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McKerrow J., Vagg S., McKinney T., Seviour E. M., Maszenan A. M., Brooks P., Seviour R. J. 2000; A simple HPLC method for analysing diaminopimelic acid diastereomers in cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria. Lett Appl Microbiol 30:178–182 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Minnikin D. E., O'Donnell A. G., Goodfellow M., Alderson G., Athalye M., Schaal A., Parlett J. H. 1984; An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J Microbiol Methods 2:233–241 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Parte A. C. 2014; LPSN–list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 42:(D1)D613–D616 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Saitou N., Nei M. 1987; The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Shirling E. B., Gottlieb D. 1966; Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int J Syst Bacteriol 16:313–340 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Smibert R. M., Krieg N. R. 1994; Phenotypic characterization. In Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology pp 607–654Edited by Gerhardt P., Murray R. G. E., Wood W. A., Krieg N. R. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar S. 2013; MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Waksman S. A., Henrici A. T. 1943; The nomenclature and classification of the actinomycetes. J Bacteriol 46:337–341[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Wang X., Zhao J., Liu C., Wang J., Shen Y., Jia F., Wang L., Zhang J., Yu C., Xiang W. 2013; Nonomuraea solani sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from eggplant root (Solanum melongena L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:2418–2423 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wayne L. G., Brenner D. J., Colwell R. R., Grimont P. A. D., Kandler O., Krichevsky M. I., Moore L. H., Moore W. E. C., Murray R. G. E., other authors. 1987; International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu C., Lu X., Qin M., Wang Y., Ruan J. 1989; Analysis of menaquinone compound in microbial cells by HPLC. Microbiology [English translation of Microbiology (Beijing)] 16:176–178
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Xiang W., Liu C., Wang X., Du J., Xi L., Huang Y. 2011; Actinoalloteichus nanshanensis sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of a fig tree (Ficus religiosa). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1165–1169 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Xu P., Li W. J., Tang S. K., Zhang Y. Q., Chen G. Z., Chen H. H., Xu L. H., Jiang C. L. 2005; Naxibacter alkalitolerans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel member of the family ‘Oxalobacteraceae’ isolated from China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1149–1153 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Yokota A., Tamura T., Hasegawa T., Huang L. H. 1993; Catenuloplanes japonicas gen. nov., sp. nov., nom. rev., a new genus of the order Actinomycetales . Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:805–812 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhou X., Yuping Z., Zhao H., Liang J., Zhang Y., Shi S. 2015; Antioxidant homoisoflavonoids from Polygonatum odoratum . Food Chem 186:63–68 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000906
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000906
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary Data

PDF

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error