is not a later heterotypic synonym of ; , subsp. and ‘’ are later heterotypic synonyms of based on phylogenomics Free

Abstract

was previously reported to be a later heterotypic synonym of , based primarily on DNA–DNA relatedness values. We have sequenced a draft genome of NRRL B-41580. Comparative genomics and DNA–DNA relatedness calculations show that it is not a synonym of It was instead synonymous with ’ is a recently described species that was isolated as an endophyte of rice (). The strain was demonstrated to have plant-pathogen antagonist activity in greenhouse assays, and the 16S rRNA gene was reported to have 99.7 % sequence similarity with and , which are both known for their plant pathogen antagonism. To better understand the phylogenetics of these closely related strains, we sequenced the genome of ‘. ’ KACC 18228. Comparative genomic analysis showed only minor differences between this strain and the genomes of NRRL B-41580, KACC 13015 and subsp. FZB42. The pairwise DNA–DNA hybridization values calculated in comparisons between the strains were all greater than 84 %, which is well above the standard species threshold of 70 %. The results of morphological, physiological, chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic analyses indicate that the strains share phenotype and genotype coherence. Therefore, we propose that KACC 13015, subsp. FZB42, and ‘ KACC 18228 should be reclassified as later heterotypic synonyms of NRRL B-41580, since the valid publication date of precedes the other three strains.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000858
2016-03-01
2024-03-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/66/3/1212.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000858&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Auch A. F., von Jan M., Klenk H. P., Goker M. 2010; Digital DNA-DNA hybridization for microbial species delineation by means of genome-to-genome sequence comparison. Stand Genomic Sci 2:117–134[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Borriss R., Chen X. H., Rueckert C., Blom J., Becker A., Baumgarth B., Fan B., Pukall R., Schumann P., other authors. 2011; Relationship of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens clades associated with strains DSM 7T and FZB42T: a proposal for Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. amyloliquefaciens subsp. nov. and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum subsp. nov. based on complete genome sequence comparisons. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:1786–1801[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chung E. J., Hossain M. T., Khan A., Kim K. H., Jeon C. O., Chung Y. R. 2015; Bacillus oryzicola sp. nov., an endophytic bacterium isolated from the roots of rice with antimicrobial, plant growth promoting, and systemic resistance inducing activities in rice. Plant Pathol J 31:152–164 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Dunlap C. A. 2015; Phylogenomic analysis shows that ‘Bacillus vanillea’ is a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus siamensis . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:3507–3510 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Dunlap C. A., Kim S.-J., Kwon S.-W., Rooney A. P. 2015; Phylogenomic analysis shows that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum is a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus methylotrophicus . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:2104–2109 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Goris J., Konstantinidis K. T., Klappenbach J. A., Coenye T., Vandamme P., Tiedje J. M. 2007; DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. In Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 5781–91[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Jeong H., Park S. H., Choi S. K. 2015; Genome sequence of antibiotic-producing Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain KCTC 13012. Genome Announc 3:e01121–e01115 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jolley K. A., Maiden M. C. 2010; BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics 11:595 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kim O. S., Cho Y. J., Lee K., Yoon S. H., Kim M., Na H., Park S. C., Jeon Y. S., Lee J. H., other authors. 2012; Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:716–721 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ma L., Cao Y. H., Cheng M. H., Huang Y., Mo M. H., Wang Y., Yang J. Z., Yang F. X. 2013; Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial endophytes of Panax notoginseng with antagonistic characteristics towards pathogens of root-rot disease complex. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 103:299–312 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Madhaiyan M., Poonguzhali S., Kwon S. W., Sa T. M. 2010; Bacillus methylotrophicus sp. nov., a methanol-utilizing, plant-growth-promoting bacterium isolated from rice rhizosphere soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:2490–2495 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Meier-Kolthoff J. P., Auch A. F., Klenk H.-P., Göker M. 2013; Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Meier-Kolthoff J. P, Klenk H.-P., Göker M. 2014; Taxonomic use of DNA G+C content and DNA-DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:352–356 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ruiz-García C., Béjar V., Martínez-Checa F., Llamas I., Quesada E. 2005; Bacillus velezensis sp. nov., a surfactant-producing bacterium isolated from the river Vélez in Málaga, southern Spain. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:191–195 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tamura K., Nei M. 1993; Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. In Mol Biol Evol 10512–526[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., Kumar S. 2013; mega6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol . 30:2725–2729 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang L. T, Lee F. L, Tai C. J, Kuo H. P. 2008; Bacillus velezensis is a later heterotypic synonym of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens . Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:671–675[PubMed] [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Wayne L. G, Brenner D. J, Colwell R. R, Grimont P. A. D., Kandler O., Krichevsky M. I, Moore L. H, Moore W. E. C., Murray R. G. E., other authors. 1987; International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. Report of the ad hoc committee on reconciliation of approaches to bacterial systematics. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463–464 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000858
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000858
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary Data

PDF

Most cited Most Cited RSS feed