1887

Abstract

The genus as presently constituted is phylogenetically and phenotypically incoherent. Data from polyphasic taxonomic studies indicate that the genus comprises a collection of very heterogeneous species. Numerous phylogenetic studies, principally based on sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, indicate that the genus should be restricted to cluster I as . Despite these findings, authors continue to add novel species to the genus that do not fall within the radiation of cluster I and the type species , thus perpetuating the confusion associated with the taxonomy of this group. Here, we formally propose that members of the genus Prazmowski be restricted to the type species and cluster I species. , , and should be transferred to the genus as comb. nov., comb. nov., comb. nov. and comb. nov. A novel genus, gen. nov., is proposed for the species , and as gen. nov. comb. nov., comb. nov. and comb. nov. The type species of the genus is

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000824
2016-02-01
2022-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/66/2/1009.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000824&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bergey D. H., Harrison F. C., Breed R. S., Hammer B. W., Huntoon F. M. 1923 Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Breitenstein A., Wiegel J., Haertig C., Weiss N., Andreesen J. R., Lechner U. 2002; Reclassification of Clostridium hydroxybenzoicum as Sedimentibacter hydroxybenzoicus gen. nov., comb. nov., and description of Sedimentibacter saalensis sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:801–807[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cai S., Dong X. 2010; Cellulosilyticum ruminicola gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the rumen of yak, and reclassification of Clostridium lentocellum as Cellulosilyticum lentocellum comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 60:845–849 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cato E. P., Stackebrandt E. 1989; Taxonomy and Phylogeny. In Clostridia pp 1–26Edited by Minton N. P., Clarke D. J. Boston, MA: Springer US; [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Collins M. D., Lawson P. A., Willems A., Cordoba J. J., Fernandez-Garayzabal J., Garcia P., Cai J., Hippe H., Farrow J. A. E. 1994; The phylogeny of the genus Clostridium: proposal of five new genera and eleven new species combinations. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44:812–826 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dridi B., Raoult D., Drancourt M. 2011; Archaea as emerging organisms in complex human microbiomes. Anaerobe 17:56–63 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Finegold S. M., Song Y., Liu C. 2002; Taxonomy—General comments and update on taxonomy of clostridia and anaerobic cocci. Anaerobe 8:283–285 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gerritsen J., Fuentes S., Grievink W., van Niftrik L., Tindall B. J., Timmerman H. M., Rijkers G. T., Smidt H. 2014; Characterization of Romboutsia ilealis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from the gastro-intestinal tract of a rat, and proposal for the reclassification of five closely related members of the genus Clostridium into the genera Romboutsia gen. nov., Intestinibacter gen. nov., Terrisporobacter gen. nov. and Asaccharospora gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:1600–1616 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goodsir J. 1842; History of a case in which a fluid periodically ejected from the stomach contained vegetable organisms of an undescribed form. Edinburgh Medical Surgery Journal 57:430–443
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gupta R. S., Gao B. 2009; Phylogenomic analyses of clostridia and identification of novel protein signatures that are specific to the genus Clostridium sensu stricto (cluster I). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:285–294 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hutson R. A., Thompson D. E., Collins M. D. 1993a; Genetic interrelationships of saccharolytic Clostridium botulinum types B, E and F and related clostridia as revealed by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. FEMS Microbiol Lett 108:103–110 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hutson R. A., Thompson D. E., Lawson P. A., Schocken-Itturino R. P., Böttger E. C., Collins M. D. 1993b; Genetic interrelationships of proteolytic Clostridium botulinum types A, B, and F and other members of the Clostridium botulinum complex as revealed by small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 64:273–283 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Jain M. K., Zeikus J. G. 1988; Taxonomic distinction of two new protein-specific, hydrolytic anaerobes: isolation and characterization of Clostridium proteolyticum sp. nov. and Clostridium collagenovorans sp. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 10:134–141 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Johnson J. L., Francis B. S. 1975; Taxonomy of the clostridia: ribosomal ribonucleic acid homologies among the species. J Gen Microbiol 88:229–244 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Kaur S., Yawar M., Kumar P. A., Suresh K. 2014; Hungatella effluvii gen. nov., sp. nov., an obligately anaerobic bacterium isolated from an effluent treatment plant, and reclassification of Clostridium hathewayi as Hungatella hathewayi gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:710–718 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Knöll H. 1965; Zur Biologie der Gärungssarcinen. Monatsber. Dtsch. Akad. Wiss. Berl 7:475–477
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee Y.-E., Jain M. K., Lee C., Zeikus J. G. 1993; Taxonomic distinction of saccharolytic thermophilic anaerobes: description of Thermoanaerobacterium xylanolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., and Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., reclassification of Thermoanaerobium brockii, Clostridium thermosulfurogenes, and Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum E100-69 as Thermoanaerobacter brockii comb. nov., Thermoanaerobacterium thermosulfurigenes comb. nov., and Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus comb nov., respectively; and transfer of Clostridium thermohydrosulfuricum 39E to Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus . Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:41–51 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Linder P. 1888 Die Sarcina Organismen der Gärungsgewerben Inaugural Dissertation, Friedrich-Wilhems Universitat Bonn; Germany:
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu C., Finegold S. M., Song Y., Lawson P. A. 2008; Reclassification of Clostridium coccoides, Ruminococcus hansenii, Ruminococcus hydrogenotrophicus, Ruminococcus luti, Ruminococcus productus and Ruminococcus schinkii as Blautia coccoides gen. nov., comb. nov., Blautia hansenii comb. nov., Blautia hydrogenotrophica comb. nov., Blautia luti comb. nov., Blautia producta comb. nov., Blautia schinkii comb. nov. and description of Blautia wexlerae sp. nov., isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1896–1902 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ludwig W., Weizenegger M., Kilpper-Balz R., Schleifer K. H. 1988; Phylogenetic relationships of anaerobic streptococci. Int J Syst Bacteriol 38:15–18 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Moon C. D., Pacheco D. M., Kelly W. J., Leahy S. C., Li D., Kopecny J., Attwood G. T. 2008; Reclassification of Clostridium proteoclasticum as Butyrivibrio proteoclasticus comb. nov., a butyrate-producing ruminal bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:2041–2045 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Moore W. E. C, Holdeman Moore L. V. 1986; Genus Eubacterium Prévot 1938. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol 2 pp 1353–1373Edited by Sneath P. H. A., Mair N. S., Sharpe M. E., Holt J. G. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins;
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Parte A. C. 2014; LPSN—list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 42:(D1)D613–D616 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Prazmowski A. 1880 Untersuchung über die Entwickelungsgeschichte und Fermentwirking einiger Bacterien-Arten Inaugural Dissertation. Hugo Voigt; Leipzig, Germany:
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Prévot A. R. 1948; Étude des bactéries anaérobies d'Afrique occidentale française (Sénégal, Guinée, Côte d'Ivoire). Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 74:157–170
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Rainey F. A., Ward N. L., Morgan H. W., Toalster R., Stackebrandt E. 1993; Phylogenetic analysis of anaerobic thermophilic bacteria: aid for their reclassification. J Bacteriol 175:4772–4779[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rainey F. A., Hollen B. J., Small A. 2009; Genus I. Clostridium . In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, 2nd edn. vol 3 pp 738–828Edited by De Vos P., Garrity G. M., Jones D., Krieg N. R., Ludwig W., Rainey F. A., Schleifer K.-H., Whitman W. B. New York: Springer;
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Repaci G. 1910; Contribution à l'étude de la flore bactérienne anaérobie des gangrènes pulmonaires. Un streptobacille anaérobie. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 68:410–412
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Stackebrandt E. 1992; Unifying phylogeny and phenotypic diversity. In The Prokaryotes, 2nd edn. pp 19–47Edited by Balows A., Trüper H. G., Dworkin M., Harder W., Schleifer K.-H. New York: Springer;
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stackebrandt E., Rainey F. A. 1997; Phylogenetic relationships. In The Clostridia: Molecular Biology and Pathogenesis pp 3–19Edited by Rood J. I., McClane B. A., Songer J. G., Titball R. W. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Stackebrandt E., Kramer I., Swiderski J., Hippe H. 1999; Phylogenetic basis for a taxonomic dissection of the genus Clostridium . FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 24:253–258 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Strömpl C., Tindall B. J., Lünsdorf H., Wong T. Y., Moore E. R., Hippe H. 2000; Reclassification of Clostridium quercicolum as Dendrosporobacter quercicolus gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:101–106 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Tanner R. S., Stackebrandt E., Fox G. E., Woese C. R. 1981; A phylogenetic analysis of Acetobacterium woodii, Clostridium barkeri, Clostridium butyricum, Clostridium lituseburense, Eubacterium limosum, and Eubacterium tenue . Curr Microbiol 5:35–38 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Udey L. R., Young E., Sallman B. 1977; Isolation and characterization of an anaerobic bacterium, Eubacterium tarantellus sp. nov., associated with striped mullet (Mugil cephalus) mortality in Biscayne Bay, Florida. J Fish Res Board Can 34:402–409 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Weinberg M., Séguin P. 1916; Contribution á l'étiologie de la gangréne gazeuse. C R Seances Soc Biol Fil 163:449–451
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Wiegel J., Tanner R. S., Rainey F. A. 2006; An introduction to the family Clostridiaceae . In The Prokaryotes, 3rd edn. vol. 4 pp 654–678Edited by Dworkin M., Falkow S., Rosenberg E., Schleifer K.-H., Stackebrandt E. New York: Springer; [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Woese C. R. 1987; Bacterial evolution. Microbiol Rev 51:221–271[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Yutin N., Galperin M. Y. 2013; A genomic update on clostridial phylogeny: Gram-negative spore formers and other misplaced clostridia. Environ Microbiol 15:2631–2641[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000824
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.000824
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary Data

PDF

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error