A total of 17 Enterobacter-like isolates were obtained from blood during a septicaemia outbreak in a neonatal unit, Tanzania, that could not be assigned based on phenotypic test to any existing Enterobacter species. Eight representative outbreak isolates were investigated in detail. Fermentation characteristics, biochemical assays and fatty acid profiles for taxonomic analysis were determined and supplemented with information derived from whole genome sequences. Phenotypic and morphological tests revealed that these isolates were Gram-stain-negative, rod-shaped, highly motile and facultatively anaerobic. The fatty acid profile was similar to those of the type strains for all recognized Enterobacter species, with quantitative differences in C17 : 0, C18 : 1ω7c and C17 : 0 cyclo fatty acids. Whole genome sequencing was used to identify taxonomically relevant characteristics, i.e. for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, multi-locus sequence analysis (MLSA), in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (isDDH) and average nucleotide identity (ANI). Draft genomes were approximately 4.9 Mb in size with a G+C content of 56.0 mol%. The 16S rRNA gene sequence of these eight isolates showed >97 % similarity to all Enterobacter species, while MLSA clustered them closely with the type strains of Enterobacter xiangfangensis and Enterobacter hormaechei. These eight strains showed less than 70 % isDDH identity with the type strains of Enterobacter species. In addition, less than 95 % ANI to the type strains of Enterobacter species was observed. From these results, it is concluded that these isolates possess sufficient characteristics to differentiate them from all recognized Enterobacter species, and should therefore be considered as representing a novel species. The name Enterobacter bugandensis sp. nov. is proposed with EB-247T ( = DSM 29888T = NCCB 100573T) as the type strain.
AuchA. F., KlenkH.-P., GökerM.2010; Standard operating procedure for calculating genome-to-genome distances based on high-scoring segment pairs. Stand Genomic Sci 2:142–148 [View Article][PubMed]
BradyC., CleenwerckI., VenterS., CoutinhoT., De VosP.2013; Taxonomic evaluation of the genus Enterobacter based on multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA): proposal to reclassify E. nimipressuralis and
E. amnigenus into Lelliottia gen. nov. as Lelliottia nimipressuralis comb. nov. and Lelliottia amnigena comb. nov., respectively, E. gergoviae and
E. pyrinus into Pluralibacter gen. nov. as Pluralibacter gergoviae comb. nov. and Pluralibacter pyrinus comb. nov., respectively, E. cowanii, E. radicincitans, E. oryzae and E. arachidis into Kosakonia gen. nov. as Kosakonia cowanii comb. nov., Kosakonia radicincitans comb. nov., Kosakonia oryzae comb. nov. and Kosakonia arachidis comb. nov., respectively, and E. turicensis,
E. helveticus and E. pulveris into Cronobacter as Cronobacter zurichensis nom. nov., Cronobacter helveticus comb. nov. and Cronobacter pulveris comb. nov., respectively, and emended description of the genera Enterobacter and
Cronobacter
. Syst Appl Microbiol 36:309–319 [View Article][PubMed]
ColstonS. M., FullmerM. S., BekaL., LamyB., GogartenJ. P., GrafJ.2014; Bioinformatic genome comparisons for taxonomic and phylogenetic assignments using Aeromonas as a test case. MBio 5:e02136–e02114 [View Article][PubMed]
GuC. T., LiC. Y., YangL. J., HuoG. C.2014; Enterobacter xiangfangensis sp. nov., isolated from Chinese traditional sourdough, and reclassification of Enterobacter sacchari Zhu et al. 2013 as Kosakonia sacchari comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:2650–2656 [View Article][PubMed]
Meier-KolthoffJ. P., KlenkH.-P., GökerM.2014; Taxonomic use of DNA G+C content and DNA-DNA hybridization in the genomic age. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:352–356 [View Article][PubMed]
MshanaS. E., GerwingL., MindeM., HainT., DomannE., LyamuyaE., ChakrabortyT., ImirzaliogluC.2011; Outbreak of a novel Enterobacter sp. carrying blaCTX-M-15 in a neonatal unit of a tertiary care hospital in Tanzania. Int J Antimicrob Agents 38:265–269[PubMed]
OrenA., GarrityG. M.2014; List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:2184–2187 [View Article][PubMed]
RichterM., Rosselló-MóraR.2009; Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:19126–19131 [View Article][PubMed]
Santiago-SoteloP., Ramirez-PradoJ. H.2012; prfectblast: a platform-independent portable front end for the command terminal blast+ stand-alone suite. Biotechniques 53:299–300 [View Article][PubMed]
StephanR., GrimC. J., GopinathG. R., MammelM. K., SathyamoorthyV., TrachL. H., ChaseH. R., FanningS., TallB. D.2014; Re-examination of the taxonomic status of Enterobacter helveticus,
Enterobacter pulveris and Enterobacter turicensis as members of the genus Cronobacter and their reclassification in the genera Franconibacter gen. nov. and Siccibacter gen. nov. as Franconibacter helveticus comb. nov., Franconibacter pulveris comb. nov. and Siccibacter turicensis comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3402–3410 [View Article][PubMed]