On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, it is ascertained that the type strain of does not exist in any established culture collection or with the authors who described this species. Therefore, it cannot be included in any scientific study. It is proposed that the Judicial Commission place the name on the list of rejected names if a suitable type strain is not found or a neotype is not proposed within two years following the publication of this Request for an Opinion.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...



  1. Lapage S. P., Sneath P. H. A., Lessel E. F., Skerman V. B. D., Seeliger H. P. R., Clark W. A. (editors) 1992; International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision) Bacteriological Code . Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Reddy G. S. N., Prakash J. S. S., Matsumoto G. I., Stackebrandt E., Shivaji S. 2002; Arthrobacter roseus sp. nov., a psychrophilic bacterium isolated from an Antarctic cyanobacterial mat sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1017–1021 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Reddy G. S. N., Prakash J. S. S., Srinivas R., Matsumoto G. I., Shivaji S. 2003; Leifsonia rubra sp. nov. and Leifsonia aurea sp. nov., psychrophiles from a pond in Antarctica. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:977–984 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]

Most cited this month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error