1887

Abstract

A survey of the descriptions of novel bacterial species published in the period 1996–2006 revealed that a large number of taxonomic descriptions are still based on one or a few strains. This situation determines that not only species descriptions, but also proposals to create higher ranks, are actually based on very few strains, which could produce a highly biased scenario. The encouragement to include a reasonable number of strains in species descriptions has been largely disregarded after its proposal, since acceptance of such descriptions relies mainly on editors' and reviewers' opinions. This observation and other considerations lead us to propose the creation of the status (sp. pr.), as a compromise between the need for scientific description of biodiversity and exchange of data and the good taxonomic practice of including a sufficient number of strains in descriptions of species and higher taxonomic ranks.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64931-0
2007-09-01
2020-01-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/57/9/2185.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64931-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Christensen, H., Bisgaard, M., Frederiksen, W., Mutters, R., Kuhnert, P. & Olsen, J. E. ( 2001; ). Is characterization of a single isolate sufficient for valid publication of a new genus or species? Proposal to modify Recommendation 30b of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 2221–2225.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Lapage, S. P., Sneath, P. H. A., Lessel, E. F., Skerman, V. B. D., Seeliger, H. P. R. & Clark, W. A. (editors) ( 1992; ). International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  3. Murray, R. G. E. & Schleifer, K. H. ( 1994; ). Taxonomic notes: a proposal for recording the properties of putative taxa of procaryotes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 174–176.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Murray, R. G. E. & Stackebrandt, E. ( 1995; ). Taxonomic note: implementation of the provisional status Candidatus for incompletely described procaryotes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 45, 186–187.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sneath, P. H. A. ( 1976; ). Phenetic taxonomy at the species level and above. Taxon 25, 437–450.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Stackebrandt, E., Frederiksen, W., Garrity, G. M., Grimont, P. A. D., Kämpfer, P., Maiden, M. C. J., Nesme, X., Rosselló-Mora, R., Swings, J. & other authors ( 2002; ). Report of the ad hoc committee for the re-evaluation of the species definition in bacteriology. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52, 1043–1047.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Trüper, H. G. & Schleifer, K. H. ( 1992; ). Prokaryote characterization and identification. In The Prokaryotes, 2nd edn, vol. 1, pp. 126–148. Edited by A. Balows, H. G. Trüper, M. Dworkin, W. Harder & K. H. Schleifer. New York: Springer.
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64931-0
Loading
/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.64931-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most cited articles

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error