Two Gram-negative, yellow-pigmented bacteria designated PSD1-4T and PHA3-4T, isolated from two sand-dune plant species inhabiting coastal areas in Tae-an, Korea, were subjected to taxonomic investigation. 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis indicated that both isolates should be placed in the genus Chryseobacterium of the family Flavobacteriaceae. The phenotypic properties of the strains were also consistent with their classification into this genus. The levels of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strain PSD1-4T and other Chryseobacterium species were 95·2–97·2 %; those between PHA3-4T and others were 93·7–97·8 %. The DNA–DNA relatedness data indicated that strains PSD1-4T and PHA3-4T were clearly different from the nearest species, Chryseobacterium indoltheticum and Chryseobacterium taichungense. The major fatty acids were 13-methyltetradecanoic acid (iso-C15 : 0), 3-hydroxy-15-methylhexadecanoic acid (iso-C17 : 0 3-OH) and omega-9-cis-15-methylhexadecenoic acid (iso-C17 : 1ω9c) for both strains. On the basis of polyphasic taxonomic analysis results, it is evident that each of these strains represents a novel species of Chryseobacterium, for which the names Chryseobacterium soldanellicola sp. nov. (type strain PSD1-4T=KCTC 12382T=NBRC 100864T) and Chryseobacterium taeanense sp. nov. (type strain PHA3-4T=KCTC 12381T=NBRC 100863T) are proposed.
BernardetJ.-F.,
HugoC.,
BruunB.2001The genus Chryseobacterium . In The Prokaryotes: an Evolving Electronic Resource for the Microbiological Community , 3rd edn, release 3.7. Edited by
DworkinM. et al.
New York: Springer; http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/books/10125/
de BeerH. D.,
HugoC. J.,
JoosteP. J.,
WillemsA.,
VancanneytM.,
CoenyeT.,
VandammeP.2005; Chryseobacterium vrystaatense sp. nov., isolated from raw chicken in a chicken processing plant. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:2149–2153[CrossRef]
HanS. K.,
NedashkovskayaO. I.,
MikhailovV. V.,
KimS. B.,
BaeK. S.2003; Salinibacterium amurskyense gen. nov., sp. nov. a novel genus of the family Microbacteriaceae from the marine environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:2061–2066[CrossRef]
KimK. K.,
KimM.-K.,
LimJ. H.,
ParkH. Y.,
LeeS. T.2005; Transfer of Chryseobacterium meningosepticum and Chryseobacterium miricola to Elizabethkingia gen. nov. as Elizabethkingia meningoseptica comb. nov. and Elizabethkingia miricola comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:1287–1293[CrossRef]
KimuraM.1980; A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16:111–120[CrossRef]
LiY.,
KawamuraK.,
FujiwaraN.,
NakaT.,
LiuH.,
HuangX.,
KobayashiK.,
EzakiT.2003; Chryseobacterium miricola sp. nov., a novel species isolated from condensation water of space station Mir. Syst Appl Microbiol 26:523–528[CrossRef]
LimY. W.,
BaikK. S.,
HanS. K.,
KimS. B.,
BaeK. S.2003; Burkholderia sordidicola sp. nov., isolated from the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete sordida
. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1631–1636[CrossRef]
McSpadden GardenerB. B.,
WellerD. M.2001; Changes in populations of rhizosphere bacteria associated with take-all disease of wheat. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:4414–4425[CrossRef]
VandammeP.,
BernardetJ.-F.,
SegersP.,
KerstersK.,
HolmesB.1994; New perspectives in the classification of the flavobacteria: description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev.. Int J Syst Bacteriol44827–831[CrossRef]
YoungC. C.,
KämpferP.,
ShenF. T.,
LaiW. A.,
ArunA. B.2005; Chryseobacterium formosense sp. nov., isolated from the rhizosphere of Lactuca sativa L. (garden lettuce). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:423–426[CrossRef]