1887

Abstract

The nomenclature of the genus has reached an unsatisfactory state of affairs, with two systems of nomenclature in circulation. One system, proposed in the 1980s by Le Minor and Popoff, has received wide acceptance, although it does not conform to the rules of the Bacteriological Code. The other system, which conforms to the rules of the Bacteriological Code, is being used by an ever-decreasing minority. As a result of a number of recent Requests for an Opinion, the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on the Systematics of Prokaryotes has issued an Opinion (Opinion 80) with the intention that it should solve these discrepancies. However, like all Opinions, it is limited to matters of nomenclature and does not help to interpret the taxonomic consequences. The Judicial Commission has therefore asked experts in the field of nomenclature and taxonomy to write a commentary on the nomenclatural and taxonomic consequences of Opinion 80. The present article explains the nomenclatural consequences of Opinion 80, together with a clear presentation of the taxonomy that results when applying the currently widely accepted interpretation that the genus currently includes only two species.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.63580-0
2005-01-01
2019-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/55/1/ijs550521.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.63580-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Euzéby, J. P. ( 1999; ). Revised Salmonella nomenclature: designation of Salmonella enterica (ex Kauffmann and Edwards 1952) Le Minor and Popoff 1987 sp. nov., nom. rev. as the neotype species of the genus Salmonella Lignieres 1900 (Approved Lists 1980), rejection of the name Salmonella choleraesuis (Smith 1894) Weldin 1927 (Approved Lists 1980), and conservation of the name Salmonella typhi (Schroeter 1886) Warren and Scott 1930 (Approved Lists 1980). Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49, 927–930.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ezaki, T., Amano, M., Kawamura, Y. & Yabuuchi, E. ( 2000a; ). Proposal of Salmonella paratyphi sp. nov., nom. rev. and Request for an Opinion to conserve the specific epithet paratyphi in the binary combination Salmonella paratyphi as nomen epitheton conservandum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 941–944.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ezaki, T., Kawamura, Y. & Yabuuchi, E. ( 2000b; ). Recognition of nomenclatural standing of Salmonella typhi (Approved Lists 1980), Salmonella enteritidis (Approved Lists 1980) and Salmonella typhimurium (Approved Lists 1980), and conservation of specific epithets enteritidis and typhimurium. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 945–947.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Judicial Commission ( 2005; ). The type species of the genus Salmonella Lignieres 1900 is Salmonella enterica (ex Kauffmann and Edwards 1952) Le Minor and Popoff 1987 , with the type strain LT2T, and conservation of the epithet enterica in Salmonella enterica over all earlier epithets that may be applied to this species. Opinion 80. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 519–520.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Le Minor, L. & Popoff, M. Y. ( 1987; ). Request for an Opinion. Designation of Salmonella enterica sp. nov., nom. rev., as the type and only species of the genus Salmonella. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 465–468.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Le Minor, L., Véron, M. & Popoff, M. Y. ( 1982; ). Proposition pour une nomenclature des Salmonella. Ann Microbiol Paris 133B, 245–254 (in French).
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Le Minor, L., Véron, M. & Popoff, M. Y. ( 1985; ). Salmonella cholerae-suis subsp. arizonae comb. nov. etc. In Validation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 18. Int J Syst Bacteriol 35, 375–376.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Le Minor, L., Popoff, M. Y., Laurent, B. & Hermant, D. ( 1987; ). Salmonella choleraesuis subsp. indica subsp. nov. In Validation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 23. Int J Syst Bacteriol 37, 179–180.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Reeves, M. W., Evins, G. M., Heiba, A. A., Plikaytis, B. D. & Farmer, J. J., III ( 1989; ). Clonal nature of Salmonella typhi and its genetic relatedness to other salmonellae as shown by multilocus enzyme electrophoresis and proposal of Salmonella bongori comb. nov. J Clin Microbiol 27, 313–320.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wayne, L. G. ( 1994; ). Actions of the Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology on requests for opinions published between January 1985 and July 1993. Int J Syst Bacteriol 44, 177–178.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yabuuchi, E. & Ezaki, T. ( 2000; ). Arguments against the replacement of type species of the genus Salmonella from Salmonella choleraesuis to ‘Salmonella enterica’ and the creation of the term ‘neotype species’, and for conservation of Salmonella choleraesuis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 1693–1694.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.63580-0
Loading

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error