1887

Abstract

Note 1 of Rule 24a of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria can be interpreted in an ambiguous fashion, because the wording is not sufficiently clear. It is proposed that the wording of this note be modified to clarify this point.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/005298-0
2008-07-01
2020-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/58/7/1779.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/005298-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bøvre, K. ( 1979; ). Proposal to divide the genus Moraxella Lwoff 1939 emend. Henriksen and Bøvre 1968 into two subgenera, subgenus Moraxella (Lwoff 1939) Bøvre 1979 and subgenus Branhamella (Catlin 1970) Bøvre 1979. Int J Syst Bacteriol 29, 403–406.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bøvre, K. ( 1984a; ). Genus II. Moraxella Lwoff 1939, 173 emend. Henriksen and Bøvre 1968, 391AL. In Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 1, pp. 296–303. Edited by N. R. Kreig & J. G. Holt. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  3. Bøvre, K. ( 1984b; ). Branhamella subgen. nov. and Moraxella subgen. nov. In Validation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 15. Int J Syst Bacteriol 34, 355–357.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Christensen, P. & Cook, F. D. ( 1978; ). Lysobacter, a new genus of nonfruiting, gliding bacteria with a high base ratio. Int J Syst Bacteriol 28, 367–393.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Euzéby, J. P. ( 2001; ). Nomenclature of the subgenera Moraxella and Branhamella and of the nine species included in these subgenera and proposal to modify Rule 34a of the Bacteriological Code (1990 Revision). Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 1939–1941.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Judicial Commission ( 2008; ). The subgenus names Moraxella subgen. Moraxella and Moraxella subgen. Branhamella and the species names included within these taxa should have been included on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names and a ruling on the proposal to make changes to Rule 34a. Opinion 83. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58, 1766–1767.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lapage, S. P., Sneath, P. H. A., Lessel, E. F., Skerman, V. B. D., Seeliger, H. P. R. & Clark, W. A. (editors) ( 1975; ). International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1975 revision). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  8. Lapage, S. P., Sneath, P. H. A., Lessel, E. F., Skerman, V. B. D., Seeliger, H. P. R. & Clark, W. A. (editors) ( 1992; ). International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  9. Moore, W. E. C., Cato, E. P. & Moore, L. V. H. ( 1985; ). Index of the bacterial and yeast nomenclatural changes published in the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology since the 1980 Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (1 January 1980 to 1 January 1985). Int J Syst Bacteriol 35, 382–407.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sneath, P. H. A. ( 2005; ). The preparation of the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 2247–2249.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Tindall, B. J. ( 2008; ). Challenging Opinion 83. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58, 1772–1774.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Tindall, B. J. & Euzéby, J. P. ( 2001; ). A taxonomic note on the authorship and date of valid publication of Rhodococcus sputi. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 255–256.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Tindall, B. J. & Euzéby, J. P. ( 2006; ). Lysobacter enzymogenes subsp. enzymogenes Christensen and Cook 1978, L. enzymogenes subsp. cookii Christensen 1978 and Streptococcus casseliflavus (Mundt and Graham 1968) Vaughan et al. 1978 should have been cited in the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56, 2707–2709.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Tsukamura, M. ( 1978; ). Numerical classification of Rhodococcus (formerly Gordona) organisms recently isolated from sputa of patients: description of Rhodococcus sputi Tsukamura sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 28, 169–181.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Tsukamura, M. ( 1982; ). Numerical analysis of the taxonomy of nocardiae and rhodococci. Division of Nocardia asteroids sensu stricto into two species and descriptions of Nocardia paratuberculosis sp. nov. Tsukamura (formerly the Kyoto-1 group of Tsukamura), Nocardia nova sp. nov. Tsukamura, Rhodococcus aichiensis sp. nov. Tsukamura, Rhodococcus chubuensis sp. nov. Tsukamura, and Rhodococcus obuensis sp. nov. Tsukamura. Microbiol Immunol 26, 1101–1119.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Tsukamura, M. ( 1983; ). Rhodococcus chubuensis sp. nov. and Rhodococcus obuensis sp. nov. In Validation of the Publication of New Names and New Combinations Previously Effectively Published Outside the IJSB, List no. 12. Int J Syst Bacteriol 33, 896–897.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Tsukamura, M. & Yano, I. ( 1985; ). Rhodococcus sputi sp. nov., nom. rev., and Rhodococcus aurantiacus sp. nov., nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 35, 364–368.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Vaughan, D. H., Riggsby, W. S. & Mundt, J. O. ( 1979; ). Deoxyribonucleic acid relatedness of strains of yellow-pigmented, group D streptococci. Int J Syst Bacteriol 29, 204–212.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Zakrzewska-Czerwiñska, J., Mordarski, M. & Goodfellow, M. ( 1988; ). DNA base composition and homology values in the classification of some Rhodococcus species. J Gen Microbiol 134, 2807–2813.
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/005298-0
Loading

Most cited articles

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error