1887

Abstract

Together with 31 other incorrectly formed (i.e. as nominative nouns in apposition) specific epithets, the epithet of was corrected to in Taxonomic Notes published in 1997 and 1998. A subsequent Request for an Opinion, published in 2001, to reinstate the incorrect epithets for ten of these species was denied by the Judicial Commission in 2002. In 2007, a further Request for an Opinion was submitted to the Judicial Commission which proposed the conservation of the incorrect epithet of ’ over the corrected one, . After having stated once that the corrections made to the epithets were performed according to the correct application of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (now ‘of Prokaryotes’, ICNP), the Judicial Commission would lose authority and credibility if it were to follow a request to abandon even one of the now correct 32 epithets in favour of its incorrectly formed predecessor. Microbiologists who accept changes in names of genera should also accept the correction of grammatical or orthographical changes in specific epithets.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/000752-0
2008-06-01
2019-10-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ijsem/58/6/1508.html?itemId=/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/000752-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Berkeley, M. J. ( 1846; ). Observations, botanical and physiological, on the potato murrain. J Roy Hort Soc 1, 33 as cited by Thaxter, 1891.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. de' Clari, L. ( 1999; ). Did we demonstrate a lack of respect in correcting a bacteriological misnomer? ASM News 65, 522
    [Google Scholar]
  3. De Vos, P. & Trüper, H. G. ( 2000; ). Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematic Bacteriology. IXth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology. Minutes of the Meetings, 14, 15 and 18 August 1999, Sydney, Australia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50, 2239–2244.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Euzéby, J. P. ( 1998; ). Proposal to amend Rule 61 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 revision). Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 611–612.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Kilian, M. ( 1998; ). Necessary changes of bacterial names? ASM News 64, 670
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Kilian, M. ( 2001; ). Recommended conservation of the names Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus rattus, Streptococcus cricetus, and seven other names included in the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 51, 723–724.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lambert, D. H. & Loria, R. ( 1989; ). Streptomyces scabies sp. nov., nom rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 39, 387–392.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lambert, D. H., Loria, R., Labeda, D. P. & Saddler, G. ( 2007; ). Recommendation for the conservation of the name Streptomyces scabies. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57, 2447–2448.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Lapage, S. P., Sneath, P. H. A., Lessel, E. F., Skerman, V. B. D., Seeliger, H. P. R. & Clark, W. A. (editors) ( 1992; ). International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria (1990 Revision). Bacteriological Code. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology.
  10. Saddler, G. S. ( 2005; ). International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Xth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology. Minutes of the meetings, 28 and 30 July 2002, Paris, France. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55, 533–537.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Skerman, V. B. D., McGowan, V. & Sneath, P. H. A. ( 1980; ). Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 30, 225–420.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Thaxter, R. ( 1891; ). The potato scab. Conn Agric Expt Sta Rept 1890, 81–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Trüper, H. G. & de' Clari, L. ( 1997; ). Taxonomic note: Necessary correction of specific epithets formed as substantives (nouns) “in apposition”. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47, 908–909.[CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Trüper, H. G. & de' Clari, L. ( 1998; ). Taxonomic note: Erratum and correction of further specific epithets formed as substantives (nouns) ‘in apposition’. Int J Syst Bacteriol 48, 615 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/000752-0
Loading

Most Cited This Month

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error